From cooperation to predation: the evolutionary origins of phagocytosis
Using a dynamical systems framework, this paper demonstrates that phagocytosis can evolve from a cooperative microbial community and coexist with its original members, ultimately leading to a stable ecosystem comprising two cooperators and a pure predator.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of a preprint that has not been peer-reviewed. It is not medical advice. Do not make health decisions based on this content. Read full disclaimer
The story of how complex life began is one of the most profound chapters in biology. For billions of years, life on Earth consisted of simple, single-celled organisms that floated in the water, feeding on dissolved nutrients. Then, something extraordinary happened: one cell learned to swallow another. This act, known as phagocytosis, is the biological equivalent of a mouth. It is the ability to engulf a whole other cell, a feat that requires a flexible internal skeleton and complex machinery that simple bacteria do not possess. This event was the gateway to the evolution of eukaryotes, the group of organisms that includes plants, animals, and fungi. In many famous stories of this transition, the swallowed cell was not eaten but instead became a permanent, helpful guest, eventually evolving into the mitochondria that power our cells today. This suggests a friendly beginning, a partnership between two strangers. But for this partnership to form, the host cell first needed the ability to grab the guest. This creates a paradox: if the host and guest were already friends, why would one evolve to eat the other? If they were enemies, the host might simply digest the guest and lose the chance for a partnership. Scientists have long wondered what conditions could make the evolution of this "eating" ability possible, especially if the two cells started out as cooperative neighbors.
A team of researchers set out to solve this puzzle by building a mathematical model of a microscopic world. They imagined a simple ecosystem containing two types of bacteria living together in a shared environment. In this setup, the two species were locked in a tight, cooperative dance. One species consumed a nutrient and produced a waste product that was actually toxic to itself, slowing its own growth. The second species, however, could eat that toxic waste, using it as food to grow. By cleaning up the waste, the second species helped the first one survive and thrive, while the first species provided the food the second one needed. They were mutually dependent, growing better together than they ever could alone. The researchers then asked a simple question: what happens if a mutant appears in this community that can eat the second species? They introduced a new, rare variant of the first species that had developed the ability to swallow its cooperative partner. This mutant was a mix of behaviors; it could still eat the original nutrient like its ancestors, but it could also hunt and consume the second species for extra energy.
The researchers ran simulations to see how this new predator would fare. They found that the mutant could successfully invade the cooperative community, but the outcome depended heavily on how much it relied on hunting versus its original diet. If the mutant was a pure hunter, eating only the second species, it could coexist peacefully with the original two cooperators. The community settled into a stable state where all three types lived together. However, if the mutant was only a weak hunter, relying mostly on its old diet, it would end up competing directly with the original species for the same food. In this case, the mutant would outcompete and replace the original species, driving it to extinction. The study revealed a critical threshold: the predator had to be specialized enough in its hunting to avoid direct competition with its ancestor. When the researchers added a realistic biological cost to the mutant's behavior—specifically, the energy required to switch between eating nutrients and hunting prey—the results became even clearer. The system naturally evolved toward a community of specialists. The original cooperators remained, but the mixed-ability mutants were pushed out, replaced by a pure predator that did nothing but hunt.
This work suggests that the ability to eat other cells did not necessarily require a pre-existing conflict or a hostile environment. Instead, it could have emerged from a peaceful, cooperative community, provided that the prey was abundant enough to support a new predator. The model shows that a predatory species can evolve alongside its cooperative ancestors without destroying the entire system. In fact, the presence of the predator can sometimes help the original cooperators by keeping the population of the second species in check, preventing it from over-consuming resources. The researchers found that once a specialized predator established itself, the evolutionary path for the community changed. The system became stable, and no new "jack-of-all-trades" mutants could invade. The community split into distinct roles: two species that worked together, and one that hunted them. This separation of roles, where each species specializes in a specific way of life, might explain why we rarely see cells that are both cooperative and predatory in the modern world. The evolution of phagocytosis, the very act that allowed complex life to begin, may have started not with a battle, but with a shift in a friendly neighborhood, where a new neighbor learned to eat, and in doing so, changed the rules of life forever.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.