Energy flows through tropical bird and mammal communities reflect anthropogenic effects and biogeographic history
This study reveals that despite similar productivity, bird and mammal communities in the Peruvian Amazon and Borneo channel energy through distinct pathways shaped by biogeographic history and anthropogenic effects, demonstrating that ecosystem functionality cannot be fully understood through species richness alone.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine a forest not just as a collection of trees and animals, but as a vast, living engine fueled by sunlight. Plants capture this solar energy and turn it into leaves, fruits, and wood. This process, known as primary productivity, creates the fuel that powers the entire ecosystem. For decades, ecologists have assumed that if two forests produce the same amount of plant fuel, the animals living there would use that energy in roughly the same way. It seemed logical that a rich, green forest would support a predictable flow of life, regardless of whether it stood in South America or Southeast Asia. But this assumption overlooks a crucial detail: the animals themselves are not interchangeable parts. They are shaped by millions of years of history, different evolutionary paths, and the specific quirks of their local environments. Understanding how energy actually moves through these communities is vital because it reveals the true health and resilience of the forest, offering a deeper look at how nature functions than simply counting species ever could.
A new study challenges the idea that similar forests operate on similar energetic blueprints. Researchers from the University of Oxford and Imperial College London set out to measure exactly how much energy birds and mammals consume in two distinct tropical regions: the humid lowland forests of Borneo in Southeast Asia and the protected forests of Manu and Cocha Cashu in the Peruvian Amazon. These two locations are both lush, productive, and teeming with life, yet they have evolved in isolation from one another. The scientists did not just count the number of species; they calculated the total energy intake of every bird and mammal community, breaking it down by what the animals eat and how big they are. They found that while the forests produce a similar amount of plant energy, the animals channel that energy through completely different pathways. In Borneo, the energy flow is dominated by small birds that eat insects, whereas in Peru, larger, ground-dwelling birds and primates play a much bigger role.
The most striking discovery is that the total amount of energy consumed by animals does not depend on how many different species are present. In the Peruvian sites, bird species richness is three times higher than in Borneo, yet the total energy eaten by Peruvian birds is only about half of what Bornean birds consume. Conversely, Peruvian mammals eat significantly more energy than their Bornean counterparts, even though Borneo is home to massive herbivores like elephants and deer that are missing from the Amazon. This suggests that having a long list of species does not automatically mean a forest is functioning with high energy throughput. Instead, the specific traits of the animals—such as their body size, their diet, and their evolutionary history—determine how energy moves through the system. In Borneo, the forest is dominated by dipterocarp trees that produce fruit in massive, synchronized bursts every seven years. This irregular food supply has forced animals to adapt by being highly mobile and flexible eaters, leading to a community where small, insect-eating birds are the primary energy consumers. In contrast, the Amazon offers a steadier supply of fruit year-round, supporting a larger population of fruit-eating primates and birds that can maintain higher energy intake.
The study also highlights the profound impact of history on current ecosystems. The Amazon lost almost all of its large megafauna, such as giant ground sloths and elephant-like creatures, likely due to human arrival and climate shifts thousands of years ago. This extinction event appears to have left a permanent mark on the forest's energy flow. Without these giant herbivores to consume vast amounts of vegetation, the energy that would have gone to them is now being processed by smaller mammals, particularly rodents and primates. These smaller animals have higher metabolic rates and consume more energy per unit of body weight, allowing them to dominate the energy landscape in the absence of giants. Meanwhile, Borneo retained its large herbivores, yet they contribute surprisingly little to the total energy consumption compared to the swarms of small rodents and birds. This indicates that the loss of megafauna did not simply reduce the total energy flow; it fundamentally rewired the system, shifting the burden of ecosystem function to smaller, more numerous species.
Perhaps most importantly, the research demonstrates that counting species is an incomplete way to measure ecosystem health. The scientists developed a method to track the diversity of energy pathways, showing that a forest with fewer species can actually have a more robust and diverse flow of energy than one with many species. In Borneo, a smaller number of bird species accounted for a massive amount of energy consumption, while in Peru, a huge number of species shared a relatively smaller energy pie. This means that conservation efforts focused solely on preserving species counts might miss the real story of how an ecosystem is functioning. A forest could look diverse on a checklist but be energetically fragile if the few species that drive the energy flow are lost. The findings suggest that to truly understand and protect tropical forests, we must look beyond the number of species and examine the specific roles they play, the traits they possess, and the deep historical forces that shaped them. By measuring the actual flow of energy, scientists can now see the hidden mechanics of the forest, revealing that the path to a healthy ecosystem is not about having the most species, but about having the right mix of animals to keep the energy moving.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.