← Latest papers
📄 medicine

Prolonged travel time to intensive care in Colombia: a national analysis to inform critical care policy and network design

This national geospatial analysis reveals that while Colombia has expanded ICU capacity, significant geographic disparities persist in travel-time access to critical care—particularly for neonatal, pediatric, and burn services—highlighting the need for targeted network optimization and expansion in underserved areas.

Original authors: Agamenón Quintero Villarreal, Joseph L. Nates, Francisco Camargo-Assis, Juan José Ramírez Melo, Juan C. Lyons, David F. Estupiñán Pepinosa, Cheyenne Joa, Sarah C. Pérez, Andrés José Romero Burgos, Wil
Published 2026-07-17
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Agamenón Quintero Villarreal, Joseph L. Nates, Francisco Camargo-Assis, Juan José Ramírez Melo, Juan C. Lyons, David F. Estupiñán Pepinosa, Cheyenne Joa, Sarah C. Pérez, Andrés José Romero Burgos, Wilman Sánchez Hernández, Nicolas Ray, María Paulina Racedo Galván, Camilo Perdomo-Luna, Jorge Racedo

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the human body as a bustling city where traffic jams can be deadly. In this city, the "Intensive Care Unit" (ICU) is the ultimate emergency repair shop, equipped with high-tech tools to fix life-threatening problems like failing lungs or crashing hearts. The golden rule of this city is that time is everything: the faster a patient gets to the repair shop, the better their chances of surviving. However, just having a repair shop on a map doesn't mean you can actually reach it. If the roads are broken, the shop is too far away, or the traffic is gridlocked, the "distance" on the map becomes a dangerous barrier. This is the world of geographic accessibility—a field of science that asks not just "Is the help there?" but "Can we actually get there in time?" Researchers in this field use maps, road data, and population counts to measure the real-world journey a patient faces, turning abstract numbers into a story of who gets saved and who gets left behind.

Now, let's zoom in on a specific story from Colombia, a country with a landscape as dramatic as its geography, ranging from high Andean mountains to deep Amazonian rainforests. A team of researchers decided to play a giant game of "connect the dots" to see how well the country's emergency repair shops (ICUs) are actually connected to the people who need them. They didn't just count how many shops existed; they simulated the actual drive a patient would take, using a digital map of every road, speed limit, and turn in the nation. They treated the roads like a giant video game grid, calculating the fastest possible route from every single neighborhood to the nearest ICU, specifically looking at four different types of repair shops: those for adults, babies (neonatal), children (pediatric), and severe burn victims.

Here is what the map revealed: The country has been building more repair shops, especially for adults, and in the big, busy cities like Bogotá and Medellín, the roads are good. If you are an adult in these cities, you have a decent chance of reaching a shop within two hours. In fact, about 76.5% of the population can reach an adult ICU within 120 minutes. But as soon as you step off the main highway and head toward the specialized shops, the picture changes drastically. For babies, children, and burn victims, the "repair shops" are like rare islands in a vast ocean. The study found that 51.0% of the population lives more than 120 minutes away from a neonatal ICU, and a staggering 65% are that far from a burn unit. It's as if the city has plenty of general mechanics, but the specialized surgeons are all hiding in one neighborhood, leaving everyone else with a very long, risky drive.

The researchers didn't just guess these numbers; they played a "spot the difference" game to check their work. They compared their computer-simulated drive times against 32 real-life ambulance trips that actually happened. The match was incredibly close, with a correlation of 0.99, proving their map was accurate. However, they also noticed their computer was slightly optimistic, underestimating the real drive time by an average of about 22 minutes. This means the real-world journey is likely even longer and more difficult than the map suggests, especially in remote areas where the roads might be worse than the digital model assumes.

So, what does this mean for the future? The study didn't just point out the problem; it drew a treasure map for fixing it. By combining the "too far" zones with areas that have at least 25,000 people, the researchers identified 45 to 137 specific "priority zones" where new ICUs are desperately needed, depending on the type of care. For adult care, there are 45 such zones, but for neonatal and burn care, the number jumps to 126 and 137 respectively. The paper suggests that simply building more beds isn't enough; the country needs to strategically place these new shops in these specific gaps to shorten the dangerous drive times.

In short, this paper argues that having a hospital on a map doesn't mean you have access to care. For millions of Colombians, the journey to the life-saving help they need is still too long, particularly for the most vulnerable patients like newborns and burn victims. The study provides a clear, data-driven blueprint for policymakers to stop guessing and start building in the right places, ensuring that when an emergency strikes, the road to the repair shop is short enough to save a life.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →