Mapping Persuasion and Backer Performance in Non-Profit Sustainability Crowdfunding: A Psycholinguistic Grey-DEMATEL and LIWC Analysis
This study employs a mixed-methods approach combining Grey-DEMATEL and LIWC analysis to demonstrate that emotional tone, cognitive cues, and personalization are the primary psycholinguistic drivers of success in Indian sustainability crowdfunding campaigns, while authenticity and moral language foster trust and excessive self-reference hinders performance.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the digital age, asking for help has moved from the town square to the screen. Crowdfunding platforms allow strangers to pool small amounts of money to support everything from new inventions to community gardens. For projects focused on saving the planet or helping communities, the challenge is unique. Unlike a commercial product that promises a gadget or a service, these campaigns promise a better world. To succeed, creators must convince people to trust them and care about a cause they might never see in person. The key to this trust often lies not in the project itself, but in the story told about it. Researchers have long known that the words we use shape how we think and feel. Some stories appeal to our logic, offering facts and clear plans, while others touch our hearts with emotion or a sense of shared identity. Understanding which words work best, and how they work together, is the difference between a campaign that gathers a few dollars and one that changes a community.
A team of researchers set out to decode this language for sustainability campaigns. They focused on non-profit projects in India that aimed to meet specific global goals, such as providing clean energy or fighting climate change. To understand the mechanics of persuasion, they combined two distinct approaches. First, they gathered a group of fifteen experts, including scholars and practitioners in fundraising and communication. These experts were asked to map out how different types of language influence one another. They determined which words act as the starting point for a story and which words are the result of that story. Second, the team analyzed the actual text of eight hundred real crowdfunding campaigns launched between 2015 and 2025. They used a specialized computer tool to count specific types of words, such as those related to thinking, feeling, or social connection, and compared these counts to the outcomes of the campaigns.
The analysis revealed a clear hierarchy in how language drives success. The researchers found that certain linguistic elements act as the foundation, or the "cause," that triggers everything else. The most powerful of these drivers were the tone of the message and the way the creator thought about the problem. When a campaign used a positive, optimistic tone and included words that showed deep reasoning and planning, it set off a chain reaction. This strong, logical, and hopeful foundation led to higher perceived authenticity and stronger moral framing. It also made the story feel more attractive and personal to the reader. In contrast, the study found that relying too heavily on self-referential language—using words like "I," "me," or "my"—actually hurt the campaign. While it might seem natural for a founder to speak about themselves, the data showed that backers responded better when the focus shifted away from the individual and toward the collective mission.
The study also drew a sharp line between how sustainability campaigns speak compared to commercial ones. Commercial campaigns, which sell products, tend to use more self-focused language and rely heavily on personal storytelling to build a brand connection. Sustainability campaigns, however, took a different path. The successful environmental projects used significantly more words related to logical analysis and structured thinking. They adopted a structured, formal, and evidence-based approach. While they still used positive emotions, they avoided the intense self-promotion common in business pitches. Instead, they focused on clarity, evidence, and a shared sense of purpose. The most successful campaigns balanced these elements: they were clear and logical enough to satisfy a skeptical mind, but warm and inclusive enough to inspire a community.
The results suggest that for a sustainability campaign to thrive, the creator must do more than just share a passion. They must construct a narrative that feels both rational and relational. The data indicates that when a story is built on a base of clear reasoning and optimism, it naturally fosters trust and a sense of moral duty in the reader. This trust is what turns a casual browser into a donor. The researchers concluded that language is not just a way to describe a project; it is the primary tool for building the confidence required to fund it. By understanding that the right mix of logical clarity and emotional warmth drives support, creators can craft stories that do more than just ask for money—they can mobilize people to act for a shared future.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.