← Latest papers
📈 economics

Political Violence and SDG8

This study analyzes data from 126 countries between 2018 and 2022 to demonstrate that political violence significantly hinders economic growth, trade, and price stability while highlighting the critical role of functional governments in mitigating these negative impacts and advancing UN Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 16.

Original authors: Zakiullah Motahhar

Published 2026-07-14
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Zakiullah Motahhar

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the global economy as a massive, bustling city where 126 different neighborhoods are trying to build skyscrapers, trade goods, and keep the lights on. Now, imagine a sudden, chaotic storm of "political violence" hitting these neighborhoods. This isn't just a little rain; it's a mix of battles, riots, explosions, and protests that have been skyrocketing in number over the last few decades.

This study acts like a detective looking at the damage report from 2018 to 2022. The detective found that for every 913 of these violent events that happen in a country, the economic machine sputters in very specific, measurable ways.

Here is what the data says happens when that storm hits:

  • The Growth Engine Stalls: The city's overall speed of building (GDP growth) slows down. Specifically, those 913 events are estimated to shave off 0.035% of growth. It's like a car losing a tiny bit of horsepower every time a rock hits the engine.
  • Pockets Get Lighter: The average person's share of the city's wealth (GDP per capita) shrinks. For every 913 events, that share drops by 0.458%. It's as if everyone's wallet gets a little lighter without them spending a dime.
  • Prices Go Up: The cost of living (inflation) gets a push. Those same 913 events are linked to a 0.193% rise in prices. Think of it as the price of a loaf of bread creeping up because the supply trucks are getting scared of the road.
  • The Market Shuts: The amount of stuff being bought and sold between neighbors (trade) drops by 0.211%. It's like the city gates closing a little tighter, making it harder to swap goods.
  • The City Budget: The money the city government spends (general government expenditure) is suggested to drop by 0.014%, but here is the twist: the paper explicitly states this link is statistically insignificant. In plain English, the data is too fuzzy to say for sure if the budget actually shrinks because of the violence. It's a hunch, not a hard fact.

The "Functional Government" Superpower
The study also found a potential shield. If a city has a "functional government" (one that actually works well), it can significantly reduce the damage these violent events cause. It's like having a really good storm shelter; the storm still hits, but the people inside stay safer and the damage is less severe. This suggests that strong, effective leadership can act as a buffer against the economic chaos.

What the Paper Rules Out
The authors are careful not to say that democracy automatically saves the day. In fact, their data suggests that in the wake of violence, the "electoral democracy index" might actually be too weak to stop the drop in per capita income. They argue that democracy can sometimes be manipulated or used as a trap during these chaotic times, rather than acting as a perfect shield. So, don't assume that just having an election fixes the economic crash; the data says otherwise.

How Sure Are We?
The authors didn't just guess; they ran the numbers through four different, high-tech mathematical models (like Fixed Effect, FGLS, PCSE, and System-GMM) to make sure the results held up. They checked for errors, cross-checks, and even looked at how past years affect the present.

  • They are confident that violence hurts growth, income, trade, and drives up inflation.
  • They are cautious about the government spending part, admitting the link there is weak and not statistically proven.
  • They are suggesting that strong government effectiveness is the key to minimizing the pain, but they stop short of calling it a guaranteed cure-all.

In short, the paper paints a clear picture: political violence is a heavy anchor dragging down the economy, but a well-functioning government can help lighten the load. However, the exact effect on how much money the government spends remains a bit of a mystery in the data.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →