The Body of Euthanasia: A Phenomenological Exploration from the Experiences of Palliative Care Physicians in Colombia during 2023
This phenomenological study of eleven Colombian palliative care physicians reveals that the experience of euthanasia transcends legal frameworks, deeply impacting the medical "lived body" through complex emotional and ethical dilemmas that necessitate enhanced self-knowledge training to honor the patient's individual worldview on dignity.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In Colombia, the law recognizes that a person suffering from an incurable, painful illness has the right to ask for a peaceful, medically assisted death. This legal right, established to protect human dignity, allows a doctor to end a patient's life if the suffering is intractable and the request is free and informed. However, the reality of this law is complex. While the legal framework exists, the human experience of carrying it out is often fraught with tension. The question is not just whether the procedure is legal, but how it feels for the doctors who must navigate the request, the patient who makes it, and the family watching closely. This is where the concept of the "lived body" becomes essential. In this context, it refers to the idea that our physical existence is not just a biological machine, but a way of being in the world shaped by our personal history, our beliefs, and our relationships. When a doctor and a patient meet to discuss death, they are not just exchanging medical facts; they are bringing their entire inner worlds into the room, creating a shared emotional space that can be heavy with fear, guilt, or profound empathy.
A team of researchers in Colombia set out to understand this heavy emotional space by listening directly to the doctors who work at the end of life. They interviewed eleven palliative care physicians—specialists trained to manage pain and support patients and families through terminal illness—from cities including Bogotá, Medellín, and Valledupar. These doctors had all encountered patients who asked for euthanasia. The researchers did not look for statistics or legal loopholes; instead, they used a method called phenomenology, which focuses on describing the raw, personal experience of a phenomenon as it is lived by the people involved. They asked the doctors to describe their feelings, their ethical struggles, and the conversations they had with patients. The goal was to uncover the hidden emotional weight of the process, moving beyond the dry text of the law to see how it actually lands on the human beings who must enact it.
The study revealed that for these physicians, the request for euthanasia is rarely a simple administrative task. It is a profound emotional event that shakes their professional identity. Many of the doctors described feelings of frustration, fear of legal trouble, and a deep sense of powerlessness. Some felt that agreeing to the request was a failure of their medical training, a moment where they could not save the patient, while others felt a crushing guilt that they were ending a life. Despite these heavy emotions, the doctors also described a powerful sense of empathy. They recognized the exhaustion of the patient and the family, and for many, the desire to help the suffering person find peace became a driving force. This created a difficult inner conflict: the doctor's instinct to preserve life clashed with the patient's plea to end suffering. The researchers found that the doctors often had to manage these conflicting feelings by creating a kind of emotional distance, using technical language to protect themselves from the full weight of the tragedy, even as they tried to remain compassionate.
One of the most striking findings was how the doctors viewed their own role in the process. While they acknowledged the legal right of the patient to ask for death, most did not see euthanasia as a medical treatment or a therapeutic option. Instead, they viewed it as a last resort that fell outside the traditional mission of their specialty, which is to accompany patients through the dying process, not to hasten it. When asked who should actually perform the technical act of ending a life, the answers were divided. Some suggested an anesthesiologist, someone skilled in the medications used, while others felt it should be the doctor who knew the patient best. However, a significant number of the physicians stated they would refuse to perform the act themselves due to their personal beliefs or conscience. They described a desire to avoid becoming "fatalistic" about suffering, preferring to focus on every possible way to relieve pain before considering the final step. This hesitation was not just about the law; it was about the deep moral and emotional burden of being the one to pull the trigger.
The researchers also discovered that the conversation about euthanasia is often avoided until it is absolutely necessary. Many doctors felt uncomfortable bringing up the topic, fearing that mentioning it might be seen as "offering" it to the patient or pushing a vulnerable person toward a decision they did not truly want. This silence was often reinforced by the doctors' own religious beliefs or by the fear of saying the wrong thing. The study showed that when the topic did come up, it was usually because the patient or family asked for it directly. In these moments, the doctors tried to remain impartial, but the emotional sediment of their own lives—what they had seen, what they believed, and how they had been trained—always influenced the interaction. The researchers noted that doctors who had studied bioethics felt slightly more comfortable with the process, as they had a clearer framework for understanding the patient's right to self-determination, but even they struggled with the emotional toll.
Ultimately, the study concluded that the "body of euthanasia" is not just a legal procedure but a shared human experience that involves the patient, the family, and the doctor. It is a moment where the doctor's worldview, the patient's perception of their own dignity, and the family's grief all collide. The researchers found that the current system leaves doctors feeling unprepared for this emotional collision. They suggested that medical training needs to change. Instead of just teaching the laws and the technical steps, doctors need spaces to reflect on their own feelings, to understand their own biases, and to learn how to talk about death without fear. They need to be taught how to manage their own emotional burden so they can be present for the patient without being overwhelmed by their own doubts. The paper argues that until doctors can confront their own internal struggles with the topic, the process will remain stigmatized and difficult for everyone involved. The path forward, according to these physicians, lies in honest conversation, deep self-knowledge, and a recognition that while the law may permit the act, the human heart must still find a way to carry the weight of it.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.