Globalization and Transnational Crime in ASEAN: A Comparative Criminological Analysis of Legal and Criminal Justice Responses
This qualitative comparative study analyzes how globalization has transformed transnational crime in ASEAN into adaptive, networked forms that challenge regional responses, revealing that despite expanded legal frameworks and cooperation mechanisms, effectiveness remains hindered by legal fragmentation, institutional disparities, and governance limitations.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine the world as a giant, bustling marketplace where people, goods, and information zoom around faster than ever before. This speed is called globalization. It's like building a super-high-speed internet and a network of super-freeways that connect every country, making it easy for businesses to grow and friends to chat across oceans. But, just like a busy city has pickpockets and scammers, this super-connected world has a dark side. Transnational crime is when bad guys operate across borders, using these same fast roads and digital lines to break the law in multiple countries at once. Think of it as a game of hide-and-seek where the criminals can teleport between countries instantly, while the police are still stuck trying to cross a border with a passport stamp. Criminology is the study of why people break these rules and how society tries to catch them. Understanding this is crucial because if the bad guys are moving faster than the law can catch them, everyone's safety is at risk.
This paper, written by Achmad Irwan Hamzani and Achmad Soeharto, dives into this high-speed chase within ASEAN, a group of ten Southeast Asian countries. The authors act like detectives looking at the big picture, asking: "How has globalization changed the way crime works here, and are the police and laws keeping up?" They didn't go out and interview criminals or count arrests; instead, they read a mountain of reports from the United Nations and academic studies to piece together the story.
Here is what they found: Globalization has turned crime into a shape-shifting monster. In the past, criminal groups were like rigid, old-school armies with a clear boss and fixed bases. Today, thanks to globalization, they have transformed into networked criminality. Imagine a school of fish that can instantly change direction or a swarm of bees that can split and rejoin anywhere. These modern criminal groups are flexible, decentralized, and use both physical roads and digital tools (like the internet and crypto-currencies) to move drugs, scam people, and wash money. They are incredibly good at adapting; if you block one path, they instantly find another.
The paper suggests that while the ASEAN countries have tried to fight back, they are struggling to keep up. The countries have built new laws and set up police cooperation teams, which is like building more police stations and giving them better radios. However, the authors argue that these efforts are held back by governance fragmentation. This is a fancy way of saying the system is broken into too many small, mismatched pieces.
Think of the region's legal system as a puzzle where every country has a different picture on its piece. One country might define a crime one way, while its neighbor defines it differently. One country might have high-tech computers to track digital money, while another is still using paper files. Because the criminals can jump between these different "puzzle pieces" so easily, they exploit the gaps. They can hide in the country with the weakest laws or the slowest police. The paper suggests that the main problem isn't that there are no laws or no police; it's that the laws and police don't work together smoothly enough to catch a criminal who is moving at the speed of globalization.
The authors also point out that the victims of these crimes, like people being trafficked, often get lost in the cracks of this fragmented system. Because the countries don't always agree on how to protect them or share information, victims struggle to get help.
In short, the paper concludes that globalization has made crime smarter, faster, and more connected, but the way ASEAN countries try to stop it is still a bit messy and disconnected. The criminals are playing a game of "connect the dots" across the whole region, while the authorities are still trying to solve the puzzle one country at a time. The authors suggest that to win this game, the region needs to stop treating these problems as separate national issues and start building a truly unified, flexible defense that moves as fast as the criminals do. They admit that their study is based on reading existing reports, so while the patterns are clear, more direct investigation is needed to see exactly how these things play out on the ground in every single country.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.