← Latest papers
📄 earth_science

A construction sector environmental climate change risk management system to achieve sustainable development goals

This qualitative study proposes a risk management system utilizing a probability-impact matrix to address climate change challenges in the construction sector, aiming to advance sustainable development goals and promote green building practices.

Original authors: Kemala Hayati, Nurunnashiha Nurunnashiha, Aryana Rachmad Sulistya, Irma Sepriyanna, Qurratuain Kamazuhra, Rachmad Ardhianto

Published 2026-08-06
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Kemala Hayati, Nurunnashiha Nurunnashiha, Aryana Rachmad Sulistya, Irma Sepriyanna, Qurratuain Kamazuhra, Rachmad Ardhianto

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the construction industry as a massive, bustling kitchen where skyscrapers and bridges are the giant cakes being baked. For decades, this kitchen has been running hot, using up a lot of energy and leaving behind a smoky mess that warms up the whole planet. This is the world of climate change: a slow-cooking crisis where rising temperatures and wild weather are threatening to burn the kitchen down. But there's a new recipe book in town called "Sustainable Development Goals" (SDGs). Think of these as a set of golden rules for baking a cake that tastes good, doesn't poison the planet, and feeds everyone fairly. The big question scientists are asking is: How do we teach the chefs (construction workers and planners) to follow these new rules without burning the house down? They need a way to figure out which ingredients are most important and which cooking methods will save the day.

This paper is like a master chef's guidebook that helps the construction sector navigate this stormy weather. The authors, a team of experts from Institut Teknologi PLN, didn't just guess; they used a clever decision-making tool called the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). You can think of AHP as a giant, high-tech scale. Instead of just weighing apples against oranges, this scale weighs complex ideas like "saving money" against "saving the planet" or "building strong walls" against "using green materials." The researchers gathered a group of experts—like a panel of seasoned judges—and asked them to compare these different strategies against each other. They wanted to know: If we have to choose between fixing our carbon footprint, making buildings tougher against floods, following new laws, or helping local economies, which one should we tackle first?

The results of their "taste test" were quite clear. The study found that the single most important thing to focus on is Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction, which the experts rated as the top priority, accounting for 42% of the total importance. It's like realizing that before you can decorate the cake, you have to stop the oven from smoking so much in the first place. Within this category, the experts decided that using Environmentally Friendly Materials is the most powerful move, followed closely by Energy Efficiency.

The second most important strategy is Adaptation to Climate Change, which took up 24% of the priority. This is the "toughening up" phase. The study suggests that the best way to do this is through Extreme Climate-Resilient Design—basically, building structures that can stand up to the fiercest storms and floods, rather than just hoping for the best.

Interestingly, the paper suggests that while Environmental Regulatory Compliance (following the rules) and Socioeconomic Impact (making sure the project helps people and the economy) are necessary, they are currently seen as less urgent than the physical act of cutting emissions and hardening buildings. Regulatory compliance got 15%, and socioeconomic impact got a smaller 5%. The authors suggest this means the industry should focus on the environmental fixes first, then layer in the social and economic benefits later.

So, what's the final takeaway for our construction kitchen? The study proposes a specific menu of actions. The most effective policy to get started is Fiscal Incentives for Green Projects (like giving tax breaks to chefs who use clean ingredients), followed closely by Carbon Audit Regulations (making sure everyone actually measures their smoke). While training workers and standardizing designs are important, the experts suggest they are the supporting ingredients, not the main course. The paper concludes that by using this step-by-step ranking system, the construction industry can finally start baking a future that is safe, green, and ready for whatever the weather throws at it.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →