Scenario-Based Markov Modelling: An Exploratory Analysis of AI's Potential Impact on Customer Retention -- The Netflix Case
This exploratory study employs a Markov chain simulation and theoretical frameworks to demonstrate that, under specific assumptions, AI-driven personalization mechanisms could hypothetically double customer retention for Netflix compared to a low-AI baseline, while highlighting associated ethical considerations.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the crowded world of streaming entertainment, where hundreds of platforms compete for a viewer's attention, the difference between a subscriber staying for another year or clicking "cancel" often comes down to a single feeling: did I find something I wanted to watch? For decades, companies have tried to solve this by asking customers what they like or by showing them the same popular shows everyone else is watching. However, a new approach uses artificial intelligence to act as a tireless, hyper-observant guide. This technology does not just guess; it learns from billions of tiny actions, such as what a person pauses, rewinds, or skips, to build a unique map of their tastes. The goal is to move beyond simple suggestions and create a personalized experience that feels tailor-made, keeping the viewer engaged and less likely to leave. This is the central question explored by researchers studying Netflix, a giant in the industry that has long relied on such systems. They wanted to understand not just how these tools work, but to measure the sheer scale of their impact on keeping customers happy and subscribed over time.
To answer this, the researchers at the University of Guelma did not simply ask users for their opinions or look at past sales numbers. Instead, they built a digital simulation, a virtual laboratory where they could watch how a million imaginary customers would behave over the course of a year. They created two different worlds to compare. In the first world, the "high-AI" scenario, the platform used advanced tools to personalize every aspect of the experience, from the movie thumbnails shown to the way new shows were chosen. In the second world, the "low-AI" scenario, the platform operated with only basic, non-personalized recommendations, representing a service that lacked these smart features. The researchers used a method called a Markov simulation, which is essentially a way of tracking how people move between different states of engagement—such as being active, becoming at-risk of leaving, or having already stopped watching—based on the rules of the world they are in. By running this simulation one hundred times to ensure the results were stable, they could see how small differences in daily interactions might add up to massive differences in who stays and who leaves after twelve months.
The results of this virtual experiment were striking. In the world with advanced artificial intelligence, the simulation showed that nearly 69 percent of the subscribers were still active after a year. In contrast, in the world without these smart tools, only about 33 percent of the subscribers remained. This means that the scenario with the sophisticated AI retained more than double the number of customers compared to the basic scenario. The researchers calculated this as a relative improvement of over 110 percent, a gap that grew wider with each passing month. The simulation suggested that the most powerful factor driving this difference was the ability of the AI to win back users who were starting to lose interest. When a viewer began to watch less, the smart system was much better at showing them something appealing enough to bring them back, whereas the basic system struggled to re-engage them. Additionally, the AI helped prevent users who had stopped watching for a month from canceling their subscriptions entirely, suggesting that a history of good recommendations creates a safety net that keeps people subscribed even during quiet periods.
The study identified three specific ways the artificial intelligence achieved these results. First, it provided hyper-personalized content recommendations, using complex algorithms to suggest movies and shows that matched a user's hidden preferences, effectively doing the work of finding something to watch so the user didn't have to. Second, it optimized the user interface through constant testing, changing the images and layout of the screen to make the content look more appealing to each individual person. Third, the system guided the company in deciding which new shows to produce or buy, using data to predict what audiences would want before a single episode was filmed. These three mechanisms worked together to create a seamless experience where the right content appeared at the right time, reducing the effort required to find entertainment and increasing the likelihood of satisfaction.
However, the researcher was careful to explain the limits of their findings. They emphasized that their numbers were not a prediction of what would happen if Netflix suddenly turned off its AI, nor were they a guarantee of future performance. The "low-AI" world they created was a theoretical extreme; in reality, almost every major streaming service uses some form of basic recommendation system, so no real-world competitor performs as poorly as the simulation suggested. The study was designed to show the potential magnitude of the advantage, illustrating how powerful these tools could be under ideal conditions, rather than to provide a precise forecast of real-world revenue. The author also noted that their model simplified human behavior by assuming that a user's next action depends only on their current state, ignoring the complex history of their past interactions. Despite these simplifications, the simulation offered a clear, quantitative illustration of how personalization can transform a service from a simple library of videos into a dynamic partner in entertainment.
Beyond the numbers, the paper highlighted the broader implications of this technology for both businesses and society. For companies, the study suggests that investing in artificial intelligence is not just a technical upgrade but a fundamental strategy for survival in a competitive market. For viewers, it raises important questions about privacy and the ethics of algorithms that know so much about their habits. The researcher argued that while these tools are effective, they must be deployed responsibly, with transparency about how decisions are made and safeguards against bias. They proposed that the best path forward involves a balance between using data to create value and respecting the user's right to privacy and choice. Ultimately, the study presents artificial intelligence not as a magic solution, but as a powerful capability that, when used wisely, can reshape how we connect with the stories we love, turning a simple subscription into a lasting relationship.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.