← Latest papers
📄 earth_science

UAV-Based Thermal Remote Sensing in Desert Environments: Methodological Framework and Experimental Analysis of the Casma Valley Geoglyphs, Peru

This study utilizes ultra-high-resolution UAV-based thermal imaging to demonstrate that desert geoglyphs in Peru exhibit significant thermal detectability during specific daytime periods, challenging the traditional assumption that nighttime surveys are invariably optimal and establishing a process-based framework for interpreting archaeological thermal signatures based on material properties and environmental dynamics.

Original authors: Gabriele Ciccone, Nicodemo Abate, Angel Sanchez Borjas, Jeff Contreras, Ivan Ghezzi, Rosa Lasaponara, Nicola Masini

Published 2026-08-19
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Gabriele Ciccone, Nicodemo Abate, Angel Sanchez Borjas, Jeff Contreras, Ivan Ghezzi, Rosa Lasaponara, Nicola Masini

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

For decades, archaeologists hunting for lost cities or ancient roads in dry landscapes have relied on a simple rule of thumb: wait until the sun goes down. The logic is intuitive. During the day, the sun bakes the ground, creating a chaotic mix of hot and cool spots that can hide subtle clues. At night, the earth cools, and materials that were buried or built differently from their surroundings release their stored heat at different speeds. This difference creates a thermal contrast, a faint glow or shadow in infrared light that reveals the shape of what lies beneath. For years, this nighttime window was considered the only reliable time to find these hidden features using heat-sensing cameras.

However, the technology used to capture these heat signatures has changed dramatically. Older sensors were often too coarse to see fine details, especially when the sun was high and the ground was a blur of intense heat. Today, small drones equipped with highly sensitive thermal cameras can fly low and capture images with centimeter-scale precision. This technological leap has prompted a re-examination of the old rules. Researchers are now asking whether the strict reliance on night flights is still necessary, or if modern tools can reveal ancient secrets even in the harsh glare of midday. The answer matters not just for finding new sites, but for understanding how different types of ancient structures interact with their environment over the course of a single day.

In the arid Casma Valley of northern Peru, a team of researchers put this question to the test. They focused on a landscape dotted with geoglyphs, massive designs etched into the desert floor by ancient peoples. These designs fall into two main categories: positive geoglyphs, which are built up by piling stones or earth to create raised shapes, and negative geoglyphs, which are carved out by removing the top layer of soil to expose a lighter-colored surface underneath. The team chose this location because the desert environment, with its sparse vegetation and extreme temperature swings, acts as a natural laboratory where the thermal behavior of these materials can be observed without the interference of plants or moisture.

The researchers flew a drone equipped with a thermal camera over the same area three times in one day: just before dawn, at high noon, and just after sunset. They also captured standard visible-light images and multispectral data to compare how the features appeared under different conditions. Their goal was to track how the visibility of these ancient lines and shapes changed as the sun moved across the sky and the ground heated up and cooled down. They were particularly interested in seeing if the two different types of geoglyphs—those built up and those carved out—would react differently to the daily cycle of heat.

The results challenged the long-held belief that daytime surveys are useless for thermal archaeology. Contrary to expectations, the midday flights captured clear images of almost every feature the team was looking for. When the researchers processed the data from the high-noon flight, the thermal images revealed the raised stone spirals and the carved-out rectangular shapes with a clarity that rivaled the traditional night shots. This finding suggests that modern, high-resolution sensors are sensitive enough to detect the subtle differences in how materials store and release heat, even when the sun is at its strongest. The old assumption that solar heating always masks archaeological signals appears to be a limitation of older technology rather than a fundamental law of physics.

Yet, the study also revealed that time of day still matters, but in a more nuanced way than previously thought. The different types of geoglyphs did not all look the same at every hour. The raised stone spirals, for instance, were very clear before dawn and at noon but became much harder to see after sunset. This is because the stones, having absorbed heat during the day, cooled down rapidly once the sun set, temporarily blending in with the surrounding soil. In contrast, the carved-out shapes, which expose a different layer of earth, remained visible after sunset and before dawn, though their contrast shifted. This distinct behavior means that a single flight time might miss certain features depending on how they were constructed. A survey conducted only at night might miss a stone spiral, while a survey only at noon might struggle to distinguish a carved line from a modern track.

The researchers also tested various ways to process the raw data to make the hidden lines stand out. They found that simply adjusting the brightness and contrast of the images helped, but a more powerful tool was a statistical method that looked for patterns in how neighboring pixels related to one another. By analyzing these local spatial relationships, the team could reinforce the coherent shapes of the geoglyphs and filter out random noise. This approach proved especially effective for the night flights, where the overall contrast was lower, allowing the distinct shapes of the ancient designs to emerge from the background.

Ultimately, the study demonstrates that there is no single "perfect" time to fly a thermal drone for archaeology. Instead, the best approach is to fly at multiple times of day to capture the full range of thermal behaviors. The midday flight, once dismissed as too bright to be useful, is now shown to be a critical part of the process, capable of revealing features that might be invisible at other times. The research provides a new framework for how to search for cultural heritage in dry lands, moving away from rigid rules about when to look and toward a more flexible strategy that accounts for the specific materials and construction methods of the sites being studied. By understanding how these ancient structures breathe with the day and night, researchers can now map them with greater speed and accuracy, ensuring that these fragile traces of the past are not lost to the shifting sands of time.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →