← Latest papers
⚡ electrical engineering

Solar Thermal Water Heating and Cooling Systems Across Three Climatic Regions of Turkey: A Comparative Analysis of Five System Configurations

This study demonstrates that across three distinct Turkish climates, the required delivery temperature is the primary determinant of solar fraction in thermal systems, outweighing the influence of climate, collector area, or storage technology, as evidenced by a comparative analysis of five configurations ranging from domestic hot water to absorption cooling.

Original authors: Demiral Akbar¹

Published 2026-08-26
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Demiral Akbar¹

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The sun provides a steady, free stream of energy that has long been harnessed to heat water for homes and businesses. In many parts of the world, this solar thermal technology is a mature and reliable way to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. The basic idea is simple: collectors on a roof capture sunlight, transfer that heat to a fluid, and store it in a tank for later use. However, designing these systems is not a one-size-fits-all task. Engineers must balance the size of the collectors, the type of storage tank, the method used to move the hot water, and the specific temperature required for the task at hand. While it is often assumed that the local climate is the most critical factor in how well a system performs, a new study suggests that the temperature needed for the final use of the hot water is actually the deciding factor.

Researchers from Ostim Technical University in Turkey set out to test this idea by comparing five different solar thermal setups across three distinct regions of the country. Turkey offers a natural laboratory for this work, ranging from the cold, continental winters of Ankara in the central highlands to the mild, sunny coasts of Izmir and the hot summers of Adana. The team simulated how these systems would perform over a full year, looking at everything from simple domestic hot water heaters to complex machines that use solar heat to drive air conditioning. They examined systems that used passive circulation, where heat moves naturally without pumps, versus active systems that use electricity to pump fluids. They also compared standard water storage tanks against advanced tanks filled with phase-change materials, which store heat by melting and freezing a special wax-like substance, and even tested a system that uses solar energy to power a cooling unit for an office building.

The results of these simulations revealed a clear and dominant pattern: the temperature required to do the job matters far more than the weather outside or the size of the equipment. The study found that systems designed to deliver water at lower temperatures, around 50 to 55 degrees Celsius, achieved the highest success rates, capturing up to 90 percent of the energy needed from the sun. In contrast, systems designed to reach higher temperatures, such as 75 degrees Celsius for advanced storage or 85 degrees Celsius to power a cooling machine, captured significantly less solar energy, often dropping to around 45 to 50 percent. This drop happened even in the sunniest parts of the country. The researchers concluded that as the target temperature rises, the system loses more heat to the surrounding air, making it much harder to rely solely on the sun, regardless of how much sunlight is available or what kind of collector is used.

One of the most striking findings concerned how the water moves through the system. In the cold climate of Ankara, a passive system that relied on natural buoyancy to circulate hot water outperformed an active system that used an electric pump, capturing 63 percent of the needed energy compared to 50 percent for the pumped version. The passive system worked better because it had fewer pipes and connections where heat could escape, and it required no electricity to run. This suggests that for small homes, a simpler, mechanically passive design can be more efficient than a more complex, instrumented one. The study also looked at storage technology. While a tank using phase-change material was able to store the same amount of heat in a volume 37 percent smaller than a standard water tank, it did not improve the overall efficiency of the system. The benefit of this advanced material was purely about saving space, not about capturing more energy.

The researchers also tested the reliability of the tools used to design these systems. They compared a standard, quick calculation method often used by engineers against a detailed, hour-by-hour computer simulation. The quick method significantly overestimated the performance of the system in Izmir, predicting it would meet nearly all the hot water demand, while the detailed simulation showed it would meet about 90 percent. The difference was largest in the winter months, where the quick method failed to account for heat losses and system limits. This indicates that while simple formulas are useful for rough estimates, they can be misleading for systems that are well-sized or oversized, and detailed simulations are necessary for accurate planning.

Finally, the study extended its analysis to cooling, a growing need in Turkey's hot summers. A solar-powered cooling system in Adana, which used a large field of vacuum tube collectors to drive an absorption chiller, managed to meet nearly half of the office building's cooling needs during the summer season. While this system required a large investment and a very high operating temperature, the simulation showed it could save a substantial amount of money compared to a standard electric air conditioner, especially if energy prices continue to rise. The economic analysis suggested that even with conservative estimates, the system would pay for itself in less than eight years, and this timeline would shorten further if fuel prices increased. The study concludes that while solar thermal technology is a viable and effective solution for both heating and cooling across Turkey's diverse climates, the key to maximizing its success lies in keeping the required delivery temperature as low as possible.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →