Nursing Students’ Experiences with Extended Reality-Based Basic Life Support Training: A Qualitative Content Analysis
This qualitative study reveals that extended reality-based Basic Life Support training effectively transforms nursing students from passive theoretical learners into active, embodied practitioners by providing immersive, realistic encounters that bridge the gap between knowledge and clinical competence, despite some physical challenges with the technology.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Every year, millions of people suffer sudden cardiac arrest, and the difference between life and death often comes down to the first few minutes of care. In these critical moments, bystanders and healthcare workers must perform basic life support, a set of emergency procedures that includes chest compressions and rescue breathing. For nursing students, learning these skills is a fundamental part of their education, yet a persistent problem remains: students often know the steps in theory but struggle to perform them confidently when a real crisis occurs. Traditional classrooms and simple practice dummies can teach the rules, but they rarely recreate the pressure, the fear, or the split-second decision-making required in an actual emergency. To bridge this gap between knowing what to do and actually doing it, educators are turning to extended reality, a technology that blends the physical world with computer-generated environments to create immersive, lifelike simulations.
A researcher at Iran University of Medical Sciences set out to understand how nursing students experience this new form of training. They did not simply measure test scores or count how many compressions were performed correctly; instead, they wanted to hear the stories of the students themselves. The study focused on fifteen undergraduate nursing students who had just completed a basic life support course using an extended reality simulator. This device combined a virtual reality headset with a mannequin equipped with sensors, allowing students to see a virtual patient in distress while physically performing chest compressions on the dummy. The system provided immediate feedback on their performance, such as the depth and speed of their pushes, all while placing them in varied, high-stress scenarios like a car accident or a drowning. The researcher conducted in-depth interviews with the students, asking them to describe their feelings, their thought processes, and how the experience changed their view of their future profession.
The analysis of these interviews revealed a profound transformation in the students. The researcher identified a central theme they called "moving from cognitive knowledge to embodied competence." In plain terms, this describes a shift from having a head full of memorized facts to having a body and mind that can act automatically and effectively under pressure. Before the training, the students viewed resuscitation as a list of steps to be recited. After the immersive experience, they described feeling as though they had truly lived through the event. One student noted that when they put on the headset, the classroom vanished, and their heart rate actually sped up, their hands sweated, and they felt a genuine sense of fear, even though they knew it was a simulation. This emotional and physical reaction was not a bug in the system but a feature; it forced the students to confront the reality that a life depended on their actions, a feeling that textbooks alone could never provide.
The training worked by creating a dynamic loop of action and feedback. When a student performed a chest compression, the system immediately showed them on a screen whether the depth and speed were correct. This instant correction allowed them to adjust their movements in real time, turning abstract numbers like "fifty-six centimeters" into a physical sensation they could feel and remember. The students also faced scenarios that changed unpredictably, requiring them to make rapid decisions without time to pause or consult a manual. They reported that this forced them to stop thinking about the steps as a rigid sequence and start seeing them as a fluid, logical chain of actions. The presence of virtual bystanders who asked anxious questions or reacted to the situation added another layer of realism, teaching the students to manage their focus amidst chaos.
Perhaps the most significant finding was how the training changed the students' sense of their own professional identity. In their regular clinical rotations, students often felt like passive observers, watching experienced nurses handle emergencies without being allowed to intervene. The extended reality simulator gave them a sense of agency, making them feel that they were the ones in control. They described a gradual shift from initial shock and paralysis to a growing sense of readiness and confidence. One student expressed that they no longer felt like they were just "knowing what to do" but were closer to "actually being able to do it." This confidence was not blind optimism; it was built on the repeated experience of making mistakes in a safe environment and correcting them, which prepared them for the high-stakes reality of a hospital ward.
However, the study also highlighted that the technology is not perfect. The students reported physical challenges that sometimes interfered with their learning. The handles on the simulator were described as too large and uncomfortable, causing fatigue and distracting them from the core skill of chest compressions. Additionally, the sensors were so sensitive that if a student's hand angle was slightly off, the system would demand repeated adjustments, breaking their natural rhythm and wasting their energy. These physical limitations suggest that while the educational potential of the technology is high, the hardware needs refinement to ensure it supports rather than hinders the learning process.
The researcher concluded that extended reality is more than just a fancy tool for teaching technical skills; it is a platform that allows students to practice being nurses. By simulating the stress, the sensory overload, and the responsibility of a real emergency, the technology helps students transform their theoretical knowledge into a practical, embodied skill set. The study suggests that integrating this approach into nursing curricula could significantly reduce the gap between classroom learning and clinical performance, provided that the equipment is designed with the human body in mind. While the technology does not replace traditional teaching, it offers a unique way to prepare students for the moment when they must act, turning the anxiety of the unknown into the confidence of the experienced.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.