Financial Distress and Homeownership: Evidence from SHARE Data covering 50- to 90-year-old Citizens of the Nordic and Baltic States from 2020 to 2022
Using SHARE data from 2020 to 2022, this study analyzes Nordic and Baltic citizens aged 50–90 to find that while exiting homeownership alone does not alleviate financial distress, it can improve financial well-being when combined with better food budgets and income, whereas debt relief and job changes tend to hinder such improvements.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
For millions of people, owning a home is more than just a place to sleep; it is a financial anchor, a source of security, and a primary way to build wealth for retirement. Yet, this same asset can become a heavy burden, trapping families in debt or forcing them to sacrifice their health and daily comfort just to keep the roof over their heads. When the cost of maintaining a house begins to outstrip a household's ability to pay, a condition known as financial distress sets in. This is not merely about having a low income; it is the specific, grinding stress of struggling to make ends meet, where every bill feels like a threat to survival. Researchers have long wondered how this distress plays out for older adults, particularly when they face the difficult decision to sell their homes. Does leaving a house behind provide a lifeline, or does it simply trade one set of problems for another?
To answer this, a study examined the lives of nearly 3,000 citizens aged 50 to 90 across the Nordic and Baltic regions, including Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The researchers looked at data collected between 2020 and 2022, a period that captured significant economic shifts. They focused specifically on people who owned homes in 2020 and tracked what happened to their financial well-being two years later. The goal was to understand the specific factors that either helped or hindered these individuals when they moved out of their homes. The study considered a wide range of life changes, from improvements in physical and mental health to shifts in employment, changes in the ability to afford food, and the relief or increase of debts. By comparing those who stayed in their homes with those who left, the researchers could isolate the true impact of selling a property on a person's financial stress.
The findings reveal a complex reality that challenges the simple idea that selling a house is a quick fix for money troubles. The study found that simply exiting homeownership does not, on its own, relieve financial distress. The data suggests that selling a house is not a magic wand that instantly solves poverty; rather, it is a move that only helps if it is accompanied by other specific improvements in a person's life. For financial distress to ease, the sale of the home had to happen alongside an increase in income or a better budget for food. When these two factors improved together with the change in housing, the odds of the person feeling less financial stress increased significantly.
However, the study also highlighted several scenarios where leaving a home made things worse. If a person sold their house but also lost their job or stopped working for pay, their financial distress did not improve; it was likely to get worse. Similarly, the relief of debts alone was not enough to help. The researchers noted that when people sold their homes and tried to use the proceeds to pay off liabilities, it often did not go far enough to cover the remaining financial burdens. In some cases, the combination of leaving a home and changing one's job situation actually reduced the chances of financial improvement. This suggests that the loss of a steady paycheck or the inability to fully clear debts can outweigh the benefits of having cash from a house sale.
Beyond the mechanics of money and housing, the study confirmed that personal well-being plays a massive role in financial stability. Improvements in physical health and reductions in mental health struggles, such as depression, were strongly linked to a better ability to manage money. These positive changes helped people feel less financially distressed regardless of whether they stayed in their homes or moved out. The data showed that as people's health improved, their capacity to handle financial pressure grew. Conversely, those who faced worsening health or increased physical limitations found it much harder to escape financial stress. This connection implies that for older adults, financial security is deeply intertwined with their physical and mental state; a healthy body and mind are essential tools for navigating economic challenges.
The research also pointed to the importance of age and location. Older respondents, those closer to 90, were slightly more likely to report an improvement in their financial situation, perhaps because they had accumulated enough wealth over a lifetime to feel more secure. The study also found that people in Estonia, Finland, and Lithuania reported higher odds of financial improvement compared to those in Denmark, though the reasons for these differences were not fully explained by the data. What remained clear across all countries was that the decision to leave a home is not a standalone solution. It is a step that must be taken with a clear plan for income and debt. Without a concurrent increase in earnings or a reduction in the cost of living, selling a home may leave an older adult in a more precarious position than before.
Ultimately, this study offers a sobering but necessary perspective for policymakers and families alike. It suggests that the assumption that selling a home will automatically solve the problem of making ends meet is flawed. For homeowners facing financial trouble, the path to relief is not just about liquidating an asset; it is about ensuring that the sale is paired with stable income, manageable debts, and good health. The data indicates that without these supporting pillars, the transition out of homeownership can be a source of further hardship rather than a rescue. For governments and social services, this means that support for struggling homeowners should not focus solely on housing policies but must also address employment, healthcare, and debt management to truly help citizens weather their financial storms.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.