Oral Health Burden, Dental Treatment Patterns, and Treatment Costs among Immigrant Children in Turkey: A Retrospective Comparative Study
A retrospective comparative study of 340 children in Turkey reveals that immigrant children exhibit significantly higher caries experience in primary teeth and a greater reliance on invasive treatments like extractions and pulpotomies compared to non-immigrant controls, highlighting a need for improved preventive dental access for this population.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
When a family moves to a new country, often fleeing conflict or seeking a better life, the journey does not end at the border. The challenges of resettlement ripple through every aspect of daily life, including the health of their children. For young people, maintaining a healthy smile requires regular visits to a dentist, a routine that can be easily broken by the chaos of displacement, language barriers, or simply not knowing how the local health system works. In the world of dentistry, doctors track the health of teeth using simple counts: how many are decayed, how many have been lost, and how many have been filled. These numbers tell a story not just about sugar or hygiene, but about access to care. When children miss those early, preventive visits, small problems can grow into painful, complex issues that require more aggressive treatment. Understanding how these gaps in care affect immigrant children compared to their peers is crucial for building a health system that works for everyone.
In a university dental clinic in northeastern Turkey, researchers set out to see exactly how this story played out for children who had recently arrived in the country. They looked back at the medical records of 170 immigrant children, ranging from babies to teenagers, who had received dental treatment between 2017 and 2023. To make a fair comparison, they matched these records with 170 non-immigrant children of the same gender who had been treated at the very same clinic during the same years. The goal was not just to count cavities, but to see what kind of work the dentists actually had to do to fix the teeth, and to estimate what those procedures cost the health system.
The researchers found a clear difference in the age of the two groups. The immigrant children were, on average, older than the local children. Despite this age gap, which usually means more time for teeth to develop and potentially more permanent teeth to be affected, the story of their dental health was split between baby teeth and adult teeth. When looking at the permanent teeth that children keep for life, the two groups were surprisingly similar; the number of decayed, missing, or filled adult teeth did not differ significantly. However, the picture was starkly different for the baby teeth, which children eventually lose. The immigrant children had a much higher burden of decay in their primary teeth. On average, an immigrant child had more than eight decayed, missing, or filled baby teeth, while a local child had fewer than five.
This difference in disease translated directly into the type of work the dentists performed. Because the decay in the immigrant group was more advanced, the treatments were more invasive. The records showed that dentists performed far more extractions of baby teeth for the immigrant children—nearly 250 procedures compared to about 140 for the local group. They also had to perform significantly more pulpotomies, a procedure where the infected nerve inside a baby tooth is removed to save it, doing this 37 times for the immigrant group versus only 13 times for the controls. When baby teeth are lost too early, the remaining teeth can shift, so the doctors also placed more fixed devices to hold the space open for the adult teeth in the immigrant group. While the local children received more preventive treatments like sealants, the difference was not statistically significant, suggesting that the main issue was not a lack of preventive attempts, but rather the severity of the disease when the children finally arrived at the clinic.
The study also looked at the financial side of these treatments. Using standard government rates for dental procedures, the researchers calculated the total cost of care for each group. The total bill for the immigrant children was higher, and the average cost per child was also higher, but the difference was not large enough to be considered statistically significant. This suggests that while the immigrant children required more complex and numerous procedures, the cost did not skyrocket in a way that was distinct from the local population, perhaps because the local children also had significant dental needs. The most expensive treatments for both groups were the same: filling cavities with composite material and extracting teeth.
The researchers were careful to note that their study could not prove exactly why these differences existed. They could not say for certain if the immigrant children had worse dental habits, or if they simply waited longer to seek help because of fear, language barriers, or financial worries. The study design, which looked at past records, meant they could not track the families' journeys or their daily lives. What they could see clearly was the result: a group of children who arrived at the clinic with a much heavier load of untreated disease in their baby teeth, requiring more surgery and more complex care than their local peers. The findings point to a need for earlier and more accessible ways to get immigrant children into dental care, so that small problems can be fixed before they grow into the kind of serious issues that require extractions and complex repairs. By understanding the specific patterns of treatment needed, health systems can better prepare to support these families, ensuring that a child's new beginning includes a healthy smile.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.