Nanoparticulate selective emitters for effective radiative cooling in urban heat islands
This study demonstrates that nanoparticulate selective emitters (Nano-SEs) significantly outperform broadband alternatives in mitigating urban heat islands by achieving lower surface temperatures under the restricted sky view factors typical of dense cityscapes, thereby offering a scalable solution for enhancing urban thermal resilience.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Cities are often significantly warmer than the countryside surrounding them, a phenomenon known as the urban heat island effect. This extra heat comes from the sun warming up buildings and roads, which then radiate that stored energy back into the air, creating a feedback loop that makes cities harder to cool and more expensive to live in. One promising way to fight this without using electricity is radiative cooling. This process works by allowing a surface to radiate its heat directly out into the cold vacuum of space. The atmosphere acts like a window for this heat, letting infrared radiation pass through a specific band of wavelengths while blocking it at others. If a material can emit heat strongly through this atmospheric window and reflect sunlight, it can theoretically cool itself down even when the air around it is hot.
For years, scientists have debated the best way to build these cooling materials. Some designs are "broadband," meaning they emit heat across a wide range of infrared wavelengths. Others are "selective," designed to emit heat only through that specific atmospheric window while reflecting heat at all other wavelengths. In open, rural areas where the sky is unobstructed, previous research suggested that the more complex selective designs offered only a tiny advantage over the simpler broadband ones. This led many to believe that the extra effort to make selective emitters was not worth it. However, this conclusion assumed a clear view of the sky, a condition that rarely exists in the dense, canyon-like streets of a modern city.
A team of researchers from University College London and other institutions has now shown that in the real world of city rooftops, selective emitters are far superior. They found that when a cooling surface is surrounded by hot buildings, the simple broadband materials absorb the unwanted heat radiating from those walls, causing them to warm up. Selective emitters, by contrast, reflect that stray heat from the buildings while still letting their own heat escape to space. To prove this, the researchers developed a new type of material called a nanoparticulate selective emitter. Instead of using complex, rigid layers that are difficult to manufacture, they created tiny particles of silicon oxynitride. These particles were engineered with a porous, sponge-like structure to ensure they could be fully converted during manufacturing, giving them the perfect ability to emit heat only through the atmospheric window.
The researchers tested these materials in two very different settings. First, they placed them on a rooftop in London with a clear view of the sky. As expected, the selective emitters performed almost the same as the broadband ones, cooling the surface by a few degrees below the ambient air temperature. This confirmed that in open spaces, the extra complexity of selective emitters does not provide a major benefit. The story changed completely when they simulated a dense urban environment. They set up a test where the cooling samples were surrounded by heated walls, mimicking the hot facades of tall buildings that block the view of the sky. In this scenario, the broadband materials failed to cool effectively, often becoming warmer than the surrounding air because they absorbed the heat from the walls. The selective emitters, however, continued to cool, staying significantly cooler than the broadband versions.
The advantage of the selective design grew as the surrounding heat increased. When the researchers simulated walls heated to temperatures between 40 and 80 degrees Celsius, the selective emitters stayed up to 5 degrees Celsius cooler than the broadband ones. In even more extreme simulations, where the heat source reached temperatures of 500 degrees Celsius, the gap widened further. This happens because the heat radiating from very hot objects shifts to shorter wavelengths that fall outside the atmospheric window; the selective material naturally rejects this heat, while the broadband material absorbs it. The team also created two versions of their material: one that reflects sunlight for use on opaque roofs, and another that is transparent to sunlight for use on windows or greenhouses. Both versions maintained their ability to reject heat from hot surroundings while radiating their own heat away.
Using computer models based on the actual layout of London, the team projected what would happen if entire city blocks were covered with these materials. In low-rise areas, both types of materials worked well. But in the high-rise districts, where the sky view is heavily blocked by skyscrapers, the broadband materials struggled to keep roofs cool. The selective emitters, however, maintained lower temperatures across the entire district, effectively countering the heat trapped by the buildings. This work suggests that while simple cooling materials might be enough for open spaces, the unique challenges of dense cities require the precision of selective emitters. By rejecting the heat radiating from neighboring buildings and only releasing heat into the cold universe, these new nanoparticle-based materials offer a scalable and practical way to make future cities more livable and energy-efficient.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.