Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Menstrual Comfort Scale Based on Kolcaba’s Comfort Theory
This methodological study developed and validated a 15-item, three-factor Menstrual Comfort Scale based on Kolcaba's Comfort Theory, demonstrating its statistical reliability and validity as a useful tool for healthcare professionals to assess women's menstrual comfort.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
For many women, the monthly cycle is more than a biological event; it is a complex experience that touches the body, the mind, and the daily environment. While medical research has long focused on the physical symptoms of menstruation, such as pain or cramping, a growing understanding suggests that true well-being during this time depends on a broader set of conditions. This includes a sense of safety and mental ease, the ability to maintain daily routines without disruption, and access to clean, private spaces for hygiene. When these needs are met, a woman feels a state of relief and wholeness. When they are not, the experience can become a source of stress, affecting her health, her education, and her confidence. Until now, scientists and healthcare providers lacked a specific tool to measure this full spectrum of comfort, often relying on checklists that only counted physical pain.
A team of researchers from universities in Turkey set out to fill this gap by creating a new measurement tool called the Menstrual Comfort Scale. Their work was guided by a framework known as Kolcaba's Comfort Theory, which views comfort not as a single feeling but as a multi-layered experience. According to this theory, comfort arises when a person's needs are met across four areas: physical, psycho-spiritual (which covers mental and emotional peace), social, and environmental. The researchers wanted to see if they could translate this broad theory into a practical survey that women could use to describe how comfortable they feel during their periods. They aimed to build a scale that would capture the whole picture, from the ache in a muscle to the anxiety of not having a safe place to change a sanitary product.
To build this scale, the team started with a large pool of forty-nine potential questions designed to cover every aspect of the comfort theory. They asked a group of twenty experts in nursing and scale development to review these questions, rating each one for clarity and relevance. Based on this feedback, they removed questions that were confusing or redundant, narrowing the list down to twenty-eight items. They then tested this draft with a small group of women to ensure the language was clear and easy to understand. After these revisions, the researchers launched the survey online, reaching out to women across Turkey who were at least eighteen years old and currently menstruating. They gathered responses from 422 women in total, splitting them into two separate groups to test the scale rigorously.
The first group of 221 women helped the researchers discover the hidden structure of the scale. By analyzing how the women answered the questions, the researchers found that the answers naturally clustered into three distinct groups, or factors. The first group of questions related to psycho-spiritual comfort, capturing feelings of peace, safety, and self-confidence. The second group focused on physical comfort, measuring whether a woman felt tired, could concentrate, or could keep up with her daily activities. The third group dealt with environmental comfort, asking about access to hygiene products, privacy, and the ability to find a comfortable space at work or school. The analysis showed that these three groups explained more than half of the variations in how women experienced their periods, suggesting that the scale successfully captured the most important parts of the experience.
With this structure in mind, the researchers moved to the second group of 201 women to confirm that the three-part model was accurate. They removed one question that did not fit well with the others, leaving a final scale of fifteen questions. The statistical tests confirmed that the model was a strong fit for the data, meaning the three categories reliably represented the way women actually feel. The researchers also checked the reliability of the scale, ensuring that it produced consistent results. The internal consistency was very high, indicating that the questions worked together well to measure the intended concepts. The final tool consists of three clear sections: psycho-spiritual comfort, physical comfort, and environmental comfort.
The findings suggest that menstrual comfort is indeed a multi-dimensional experience that cannot be understood by looking at physical pain alone. The new scale provides a way to measure the mental and environmental factors that are just as critical to a woman's well-being. By offering a way to assess these different layers, the tool allows healthcare professionals to see the full picture of a woman's experience. This could help doctors and nurses identify specific areas where a woman might need support, whether it is managing stress, improving access to facilities, or addressing physical symptoms. The study concludes that this scale is a valid and reliable instrument, ready to be used in both research and clinical settings to improve the care and understanding of women's menstrual health.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.