← Latest papers
📄 medicine

Evaluating Patient Satisfaction with Oncology Pharmacy Services in Regional Referral Centers: A Mixed-Methods Approach

This mixed-methods study of 291 cancer patients in regional referral centers identifies comprehensive medication education as the primary driver of patient satisfaction while highlighting a critical gap in post-discharge monitoring services.

Original authors: I Kadek Suardiana, Agustina Nila Yuliawati, Adinda Amalia, Ferina Septiani Damanik, Dimas Aditya Suhendar, Ni Putu Vyra Ginanti Putri, Ni Ketut Sindia Wati, Ni Putu Nita Lusiana Dewi

Published 2026-09-15
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: I Kadek Suardiana, Agustina Nila Yuliawati, Adinda Amalia, Ferina Septiani Damanik, Dimas Aditya Suhendar, Ni Putu Vyra Ginanti Putri, Ni Ketut Sindia Wati, Ni Putu Nita Lusiana Dewi

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Cancer treatment is a long, complex journey that relies heavily on a team of specialists working together. Among them, the pharmacist plays a quiet but critical role. While doctors prescribe the medicines that fight the disease, pharmacists are the experts who ensure those medicines are safe, explain how to take them correctly, and help patients manage the difficult side effects that often come with powerful cancer drugs. In many places, the success of this care depends on how well the patient understands their treatment and how supported they feel by the medical team. If a patient leaves the pharmacy confused or unheard, the entire treatment plan can suffer. Therefore, understanding what makes a patient feel satisfied with these pharmacy services is not just about politeness; it is about ensuring the medicine actually works as intended.

A recent study conducted in Bali, Indonesia, set out to understand exactly what drives satisfaction among cancer patients using pharmacy services. The researchers focused on regional hospitals where patients receive ongoing care. They wanted to move beyond simple checklists and discover the specific factors that make a patient feel well-cared for. To do this, they combined two different approaches: they asked a large group of patients to rate their experiences with detailed surveys, and they sat down for in-depth conversations with a smaller group to hear their stories in their own words. This method allowed them to see both the broad patterns of what patients value and the personal details that make those values meaningful.

The study involved 291 patients who had been diagnosed with cancer for at least six months. These individuals filled out questionnaires that covered four main areas of their pharmacy experience: the quality of information and education they received, the follow-up care after leaving the pharmacy, the professionalism of the staff, and the physical environment of the pharmacy itself. The researchers then analyzed these responses to see which factors mattered most. They also interviewed ten patients to dig deeper into the "why" behind the numbers.

The results revealed a clear hierarchy of what matters to patients. The single most important factor was the quality of information and medication education. Patients who felt they received clear instructions on when to take their drugs and how to handle side effects were significantly more satisfied. This was not just a minor preference; it was the strongest predictor of a positive experience. The researchers found that when pharmacists provided detailed guidance on dosing schedules and potential side effects, patients felt much more confident in their treatment. This finding suggests that the act of teaching and explaining is the most powerful tool a pharmacist has to build trust and satisfaction.

Beyond education, the physical environment and the behavior of the staff also played a significant role. Patients noticed and appreciated clean, organized pharmacies with clear labels on their medicine bottles. They also valued the professionalism of the staff, particularly the way pharmacists communicated with empathy and without judgment. When patients felt treated with respect and kindness, their satisfaction levels rose. Interestingly, the study found that the number of people helping a patient at home mattered as well. Those with more than three caregivers tended to be more satisfied, likely because a larger support network helped them manage the complexities of their care and reduced their stress.

However, the study also uncovered a gap in care that was not immediately obvious from the survey numbers alone. When the researchers looked at "post-pharmacy services"—meaning the care patients receive after they leave the hospital, such as follow-up calls or home monitoring—the data showed this area did not significantly impact satisfaction scores. At first glance, this might suggest that patients do not care about follow-up. But the interviews told a different story. The patients explained that they did not rate this area highly simply because it did not exist yet. There was no formal system for checking in on patients after they went home, and no tele-pharmacy services to offer support remotely. The lack of a low score was not a sign of contentment, but rather a reflection of an unmet need. The patients expressed a strong desire for these services, indicating that if hospitals established formal follow-up systems, satisfaction would likely improve dramatically.

The researchers also looked at how different types of patients felt about the care they received. They found that older patients, those who had undergone surgery, and those with longer treatment histories tended to report higher levels of satisfaction. This may be because these patients have had more time to build relationships with their healthcare teams and have become more familiar with the care process. Surprisingly, patients with metastatic cancer, which is a more advanced stage of the disease, reported high satisfaction levels. The researchers suggest this is because these patients often interact with pharmacists more frequently, giving them more opportunities to receive the education and support they need.

In the end, the study paints a picture of what works and what is missing in cancer pharmacy care. The most effective way to ensure patients are satisfied is to prioritize clear, comprehensive education about their medicines and to maintain a professional, empathetic approach. The physical setting must be clean and organized, with labels that are easy to read. But perhaps the most important takeaway is the need to expand care beyond the hospital walls. The data suggests that patients are ready for, and would greatly benefit from, structured follow-up care and remote monitoring once they return home. By addressing this gap, hospitals can move from providing good service to providing truly complete care, ensuring that patients feel supported every step of the way, not just while they are standing at the pharmacy counter.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →