← Latest papers
📄 medicine

Correlation Between Sodium and Potassium Levels in Arterial Blood Gas Samples and Serum

This 2024–2025 cross-sectional study of 102 patients at Shohadaye Kargar Hospital found that while arterial blood gas (ABG) sodium and potassium levels differ significantly from serum measurements, the strong positive correlations observed suggest ABG analysis remains a reliable method for estimating electrolyte status in critically ill patients.

Original authors: Abolhasan Halvani, Mohammad Hassan Shafizadeh, Mohammad Mahdi pazhavand, Mehdi Zahmatkesh, Hossein Fallahzadeh

Published 2026-10-15
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Abolhasan Halvani, Mohammad Hassan Shafizadeh, Mohammad Mahdi pazhavand, Mehdi Zahmatkesh, Hossein Fallahzadeh

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

In the high-stakes environment of a hospital emergency room or an intensive care unit, doctors constantly monitor the chemical balance of a patient's blood. Two of the most critical ingredients in this mixture are sodium and potassium. Sodium acts like a regulator for the body's water and blood pressure, while potassium is essential for the heart to beat in a steady rhythm. When these levels drift too high or too low, the consequences can be swift and dangerous. To check these levels, medical teams traditionally draw blood from a vein and send it to a laboratory, a process that takes time. However, in critical moments, doctors often need answers immediately. Modern machines that analyze blood for breathing and acid balance can also measure these chemicals right at the bedside, offering a speed advantage. The question facing clinicians is whether these quick, on-the-spot readings are accurate enough to guide life-saving decisions, or if they differ too much from the standard laboratory results to be trusted.

A team of researchers in Iran set out to answer this question by comparing the two methods directly. They worked with 102 patients admitted to the intensive care and emergency departments of hospitals in Yazd. For each patient, the team collected two samples almost simultaneously: one from an artery to be analyzed by the bedside machine, and another from a vein to be tested in the standard laboratory. They ensured that no more than thirty minutes passed between the two draws and that no new medications or fluids were given in that window, which could have skewed the results. The goal was to see if the numbers produced by the rapid arterial test matched the numbers from the slower serum test, and to understand how closely they moved together.

The results revealed a clear pattern of difference between the two methods. When the researchers looked at the average numbers, the sodium levels measured by the arterial machine were consistently higher than those found in the laboratory serum samples. The arterial readings averaged 144.75 milliequivalents per liter, while the serum readings averaged 138.3 milliequivalents per liter. Conversely, the potassium levels told a different story. The arterial machine reported lower values, averaging 3.75 milliequivalents per liter, compared to the serum average of 4.17 milliequivalents per liter. These differences were not random fluctuations; they were statistically significant, meaning the gap between the two methods was real and consistent across the group of patients.

Despite these systematic gaps in the average numbers, the study found that the two methods were still very much in sync regarding how individual patients compared to one another. When a patient had a high potassium level in their serum, they also tended to have a high level in their arterial sample, even if the exact number was lower. The researchers calculated a strong connection between the two sets of potassium readings, indicating that the arterial test reliably tracks the changes seen in the serum. The connection for sodium was also positive and significant, though slightly less tight than for potassium. This suggests that while the arterial machine might not give the exact same number as the lab, it is very good at showing whether a patient's levels are rising or falling relative to others.

The study also looked at whether factors like age, gender, or underlying health conditions changed how these two methods compared. The researchers found that age did not influence the difference between the tests; the gap remained consistent whether the patient was a child or an elderly adult. Gender, however, did play a role in the actual levels of potassium. Men had higher potassium levels than women in both the arterial and serum samples, but the difference between the two testing methods remained the same for both sexes. The presence of common illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes, or kidney problems did not alter the relationship between the arterial and serum results. The only exception noted was for patients with lung disease, who showed a specific difference in sodium levels, and for those taking a specific type of blood pressure medication known as ACE inhibitors, which was linked to lower sodium readings in the arterial samples.

The researchers also examined how the body's acid-base balance, measured by pH and bicarbonate levels, affected the results. They found that the potassium levels in the arterial samples were closely tied to the body's acidity. When the blood was more acidic, the potassium levels measured by the arterial machine were higher, a finding that aligns with known biological processes where acid pushes potassium out of cells. Sodium levels, however, did not show a strong link to these acid-base changes. This distinction highlights that while the arterial test captures the rapid shifts in potassium driven by the body's chemical state, it measures sodium in a way that is consistently offset from the standard lab value.

In the end, the study concludes that the arterial blood gas machine is a useful tool for getting a quick picture of a patient's electrolyte status, particularly for potassium. The strong agreement between the two methods means that if a patient's potassium is dangerously high or low, the arterial test will likely catch it, even if the specific number is slightly different from what the lab would report. However, the consistent difference in the average numbers means that doctors cannot simply treat the arterial reading as identical to the serum reading. In critical situations where every second counts, the arterial test provides a reliable estimate, but for precise decision-making, especially when the numbers are close to the danger zone, the standard laboratory confirmation remains the gold standard. The research confirms that while the two methods do not produce identical numbers, they move together in a predictable way, offering a valuable shortcut for clinicians managing critically ill patients.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →