Torpor initiation and metabolic regulation operate at different biological levels in coexisting temperate bats
This study reveals that in coexisting temperate bats, the decision to enter torpor is primarily driven by between-species differences in body mass, whereas the depth of torpor and metabolic regulation are governed by within-species variations in body mass, energetic state, and ambient temperature, demonstrating a decoupling of torpor use and metabolic control across biological levels.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of a preprint that has not been peer-reviewed. It is not medical advice. Do not make health decisions based on this content. Read full disclaimer
In the cold, high-altitude forests of central Mexico, small mammals face a relentless arithmetic problem: they burn energy just to stay warm, but the food they need to fuel that fire is often scarce. For creatures like bats, which have high metabolic rates relative to their tiny size, maintaining a constant body temperature can be an exhausting, even deadly, endeavor when the air turns frigid. To survive these lean times, many small endotherms—animals that generate their own heat—have evolved a remarkable trick called torpor. This is not sleep, but a reversible state where the animal deliberately turns down its internal thermostat, slowing its heart and dropping its body temperature to match the cool air around it. By doing so, they slash their energy consumption, essentially putting their metabolism on a deep, energy-saving pause. While scientists have long known that animals use this strategy, a lingering question has remained about how different species and individual animals within those species decide when to hit the pause button and how deeply they press it.
A team of researchers in Tlaxcala, Mexico, set out to untangle this complexity by studying a community of insect-eating bats living together in a temperate ecosystem. They wanted to know if the decision to enter torpor was a fixed trait of a species, or if it was a flexible response driven by the immediate condition of the individual animal. To find the answer, they captured twenty-one adult male bats from six different species and brought them into a controlled laboratory setting. There, they subjected the bats to two distinct scenarios: one where the animals were well-fed and another where they were briefly starved to simulate a shortage of food. By carefully measuring oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production, the scientists could track exactly how much energy each bat used and whether it slipped into torpor as the temperature in the chamber was gradually lowered.
The study revealed a surprising split in how these biological processes work. The decision to enter torpor was found to be primarily a species-level strategy. The researchers discovered that larger bat species were significantly more likely to enter torpor than their smaller counterparts. This finding runs counter to the common assumption that the smallest animals, which lose heat the fastest, are the ones most desperate to use energy-saving tricks. Instead, it appears that larger bats, with their greater absolute energy reserves, feel secure enough to use torpor as a routine management tool, perhaps because they have enough stored fuel to safely wake up later. In contrast, the smaller species in the study seemed to hold back, possibly because the risk of running out of energy before they could warm themselves up again was too high. The researchers also noted that the evolutionary family tree of the bats did not strongly predict who would use torpor, suggesting that this behavior is a flexible adaptation to current conditions rather than a rigid, inherited rule.
Once the bats had decided to enter torpor, however, the rules changed completely. The depth of the torpor—how much the animal slowed its metabolism—was not determined by the species it belonged to, but by the specific body mass of the individual animal. Within any given species, the lighter individuals were able to drop their metabolic rates lower and achieve a deeper state of torpor than the heavier individuals of the same kind. It is as if the smaller bats, having less mass to keep cool, could let their body temperature fall further and their energy use drop more drastically. Furthermore, how deep a bat went into this state depended on a complex interaction between the outside temperature and whether the bat had eaten recently. A bat that was hungry and faced with cold air would suppress its metabolism differently than a well-fed bat in the same cold air. This indicates that the magnitude of energy saving is a fine-tuned, individual adjustment, responsive to the immediate physical state of the animal and the environment.
These findings suggest that torpor is not a single, simple switch that an animal flips, but rather a sequence of distinct physiological events governed by different biological levels. The choice to start the process is a broad, species-level strategy linked to body size, while the intensity of the process is a personal, individual adjustment linked to the animal's current weight and energy reserves. By separating these two components, the study provides a clearer picture of how different species can live side by side in the same harsh environment. They may share the same cold nights and the same need to save energy, but they solve the problem in different ways: some species are wired to take the risk of entering the cold state, while individuals within those species fine-tune exactly how far they go. This decoupling of initiation and regulation offers a new way to understand how nature allows diverse creatures to coexist, each navigating the balance between survival and energy expenditure with its own unique set of rules.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.