← Latest papers
📈 economics

Future-blindness and the product topology

This paper establishes that the product topology is the finest topology compatible with eventual future-blind preferences, thereby providing a behavioral foundation for its use in studying equilibrium existence in infinite-dimensional spaces and characterizing the associated dual spaces.

Original authors: Marcel Andrade, Lorenzo Bastianello, Jaime Orrillo

Published 2026-02-09
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Marcel Andrade, Lorenzo Bastianello, Jaime Orrillo

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you are trying to decide between two different life plans. One plan offers you a steady stream of happiness for the next 100 years. The other offers you a huge burst of happiness right now, but then nothing for the rest of your life.

Most economic models assume people are "patient." They believe that a dollar (or a unit of happiness) received 50 years from now is almost as valuable as a dollar received today, provided the amount is big enough. They can see the distant future clearly.

This paper, however, looks at a very different kind of person: the Future-Blind.

The Two Types of "Blindness"

The authors, Marcel Andrade, Lorenzo Bastianello, and Jaime Orrillo, study people who are so impatient they effectively go blind to the future. They define two levels of this blindness:

1. The "Hard Cutoff" (N-Blindness)
Imagine a person who has a mental calendar. They care deeply about today, tomorrow, and the next few days. But once the calendar flips past a specific date—let's say, December 31st of this year—they literally cannot see anything beyond it.

  • The Analogy: It's like wearing a blindfold that starts at a specific mile marker on a highway. If you offer this person a million dollars to be paid 100 years from now, they don't care. To them, that money doesn't exist. They only care about the first NN periods of time.
  • The Math: The paper proves that for these people, the mathematical "rules of the game" (the topology) must treat any future events after that cutoff date as if they are zero.

2. The "Fading Vision" (Eventual Blindness)
This is a slightly more flexible version. Imagine a person who doesn't have a fixed date on their calendar. Instead, they just have a very short attention span.

  • The Analogy: Think of a flashlight in a dark room. As you walk further away from the light, things get darker and darker until you can't see them at all. Even if you promise to make the object in the distance brighter (give them more money) the further away it is, this person eventually stops seeing it.
  • The Key Difference: Unlike the first type, this person doesn't have a fixed "cut-off" date. However, for any specific situation, there is always a point in the future where they stop caring, no matter how much you try to compensate them.

The Big Discovery: The "Product Topology"

The authors use advanced math (specifically, something called topology, which is the study of shapes and how things are connected) to figure out what kind of mathematical "lens" fits these blind people.

In economics, we use different "lenses" to measure how close two different life plans are to each other.

  • The "Sup-Norm" Lens (The Patient View): This lens says that a dollar received 1,000 years from now is just as "far away" as a dollar received 10 years from now. It treats all future time equally. This is bad for future-blind people because it doesn't capture their impatience.
  • The "Product Topology" Lens (The Blind View): The paper's main "Aha!" moment is proving that the Product Topology is the perfect lens for future-blind people.

What does this mean in plain English?
The Product Topology is a mathematical rule that says: "If two life plans look the same for the first few years, they are considered 'close' or 'similar,' even if they are totally different 1,000 years from now."

The authors show that if an agent is Eventually Blind (they ignore the distant future no matter what), their preferences are continuous only if we use the Product Topology. Conversely, if we assume the Product Topology is the right way to measure value, it implies that agents must be eventually blind.

Why Does This Matter? (The "Price" of Blindness)

In economics, "prices" are often represented by mathematical functions that assign a value to every possible future stream of goods. The paper looks at what happens to these "prices" when agents are blind.

  • For the Hard Cutoff (N-Blind): The "prices" for anything after the cutoff date are zero. The market only values the first NN years.
  • For the Fading Vision (Eventually Blind): The "prices" are only non-zero for a finite number of years. Eventually, the price of a good 1,000 years from now drops to zero.

The paper connects this to a famous quote by King Louis XV: "Après moi, le déluge" ("After me, the flood"). This attitude represents the ultimate future-blindness: "I don't care what happens after I'm gone." The authors show that mathematically, this attitude is perfectly consistent with the Product Topology.

The Takeaway

This paper bridges the gap between human behavior and abstract math. It tells us:

  1. Behavior drives Math: If people are so impatient that they ignore the distant future, the mathematical tools we use to study them (the Product Topology) must reflect that blindness.
  2. Math explains Behavior: If we use the Product Topology to study economic equilibrium (how markets settle), we are implicitly assuming that everyone is eventually blind to the distant future.

The authors provide a "behavioral foundation" for a mathematical tool that economists have been using for decades. They prove that using the Product Topology isn't just a convenient math trick; it's a specific statement about how impatient people are. If you use this math, you are saying, "My agents care about the present, and eventually, they stop caring about the future, no matter how much you pay them."

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →