← Latest papers
⚛️ high-energy experiments

High-Energy Neutrino Tomography of the Earth's Interior with IceCube

Using 10.7 years of high-energy neutrino data from the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, researchers successfully reconstructed the Earth's radial density profile and derived its mass and moment of inertia, providing the most precise weak-interaction measurements of these planetary properties to date and demonstrating neutrinos as a novel, complementary probe of Earth's interior alongside traditional seismological and gravitational methods.

Original authors: The IceCube Collaboration, R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, J. M. Alameddine, S. Ali, N. M. Amin, K. Andeen, C. Argüelles, S. Athanasiadou, S. N. Axani, R. Babu, X. Bai, A.
Published 2026-07-09
📖 4 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: The IceCube Collaboration, R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, J. M. Alameddine, S. Ali, N. M. Amin, K. Andeen, C. Argüelles, S. Athanasiadou, S. N. Axani, R. Babu, X. Bai, A. Balagopal V., S. W. Barwick, V. Basu, R. Bay, J. J. Beatty, J. Becker Tjus, P. Behrens, J. Beise, C. Bellenghi, S. Benkel, S. BenZvi, D. Berley, E. Bernardini, D. Z. Besson, E. Blaufuss, L. Bloom, S. Blot, F. Bontempo, J. Y. Book Motzkin, C. Boscolo Meneguolo, S. Böser, O. Botner, J. Böttcher, J. Braun, B. Brinson, Z. Brisson-Tsavoussis, L. Brusa, R. T. Burley, D. Butterfield, K. Carloni, J. Carpio, N. Chau, Y. C. Chen, Z. Chen, D. Chirkin, S. Choi, A. Chubarov, B. A. Clark, G. H. Collin, D. A. Coloma Borja, A. Connolly, J. M. Conrad, D. F. Cowen, C. De Clercq, J. J. DeLaunay, D. Delgado, T. Delmeulle, S. Deng, P. Desiati, K. D. de Vries, G. de Wasseige, T. DeYoung, J. C. Díaz-Vélez, S. DiKerby, T. Ding, M. Dittmer, A. Domi, L. Draper, L. Dueser, D. Durnford, K. Dutta, M. A. DuVernois, T. Ehrhardt, L. Eidenschink, A. Eimer, C. Eldridge, P. Eller, E. Ellinger, D. Elsässer, R. Engel, H. Erpenbeck, W. Esmail, S. Eulig, J. Evans, P. A. Evenson, K. L. Fan, K. Fang, K. Farrag, A. Fattorini, A. R. Fazely, A. Fedynitch, N. Feigl, C. Finley, D. Fox, A. Franckowiak, S. Fukami, P. Fürst, J. Gallagher, E. Ganster, A. Garcia, M. Garcia, E. Genton, L. Gerhardt, A. Ghadimi, C. Glaser, T. Glüsenkamp, J. G. Gonzalez, S. Goswami, A. Granados, D. Grant, S. J. Gray, S. Griffin, S. Griswold, K. M. Groth, D. Guevel, C. Günther, P. Gutjahr, C. Ha, A. Hallgren, L. Halve, F. Halzen, L. Hamacher, M. Handt, K. Hanson, J. Hardin, A. A. Harnisch, P. Hatch, A. Haungs, J. Häußler, K. Helbing, J. Hellrung, B. Henke, L. Hennig, F. Henningsen, L. Heuermann, R. Hewett, N. Heyer, S. Hickford, A. Hidvegi, C. Hill, G. C. Hill, R. Hmaid, K. D. Hoffman, A. Hollnagel, D. Hooper, S. Hori, K. Hoshina, M. Hostert, W. Hou, M. Hrywniak, T. Huber, K. Hultqvist, K. Hymon, A. Ishihara, W. Iwakiri, M. Jacquart, S. Jain, O. Janik, M. Jansson, M. Jin, N. Kamp, D. Kang, W. Kang, A. Kappes, L. Kardum, T. Karg, A. Karle, A. Katil, M. Kauer, J. L. Kelley, M. Khanal, A. Khatee Zathul, A. Kheirandish, T. Kim, H. Kimku, F. Kirchner, J. Kiryluk, C. Klein, S. R. Klein, Y. Kobayashi, S. Koch, A. Kochocki, R. Koirala, H. Kolanoski, T. Kontrimas, L. Köpke, C. Kopper, D. J. Koskinen, P. Koundal, M. Kowalski, T. Kozynets, A. Kravka, N. Krieger, T. Krishnan, K. Kruiswijk, E. Krupczak, E. Kun, N. Kurahashi, C. Lagunas Gualda, L. Lallement Arnaud, M. J. Larson, F. Lauber, J. P. Lazar, K. Leonard DeHolton, A. Leszczyńska, C. Li, J. Liao, C. Lin, Q. R. Liu, Y. T. Liu, M. Liubarska, C. Love, L. Lu, F. Lucarelli, W. Luszczak, Y. Lyu, M. Macdonald, E. Magnus, Y. Makino, E. Manao, S. Mancina, A. Mand, I. C. Mariş, S. Marka, Z. Marka, L. Marten, I. Martinez-Soler, R. Maruyama, J. Mauro, F. Mayhew, F. McNally, K. Meagher, A. Medina, M. Meier, Y. Merckx, L. Merten, S. Minji, J. Mitchell, L. Molchany, S. Mondal, T. Montaruli, R. W. Moore, Y. Morii, A. Mosbrugger, D. Mousadi, E. Moyaux, T. Mukherjee, M. Nakos, U. Naumann, R. Neshat, L. Neste, M. Neumann, H. Niederhausen, M. U. Nisa, K. Noda, A. Noell, A. Novikov, A. Obertacke, V. O'Dell, A. Olivas, R. Orsoe, J. Osborn, E. O'Sullivan, B. Owens, V. Palusova, H. Pandya, A. Parenti, C. Parisel, N. Park, V. Parrish, E. N. Paudel, L. Paul, C. Pérez de los Heros, T. Pernice, T. C. Petersen, J. Peterson, S. Pick, M. Plum, A. Pontén, V. Poojyam, B. Pries, R. Procter-Murphy, G. T. Przybylski, L. Pyras, C. Raab, J. Rack-Helleis, N. Rad, M. Ravn, K. Rawlins, Z. Rechav, A. Rehman, I. Reistroffer, E. Resconi, C. D. Rho, W. Rhode, L. Ricca, B. Riedel, A. Rifaie, E. J. Roberts, S. Rodan, M. Rongen, A. Rosted, C. Rott, T. Ruhe, L. Ruohan, D. Ryckbosch, J. Saffer, D. Salazar-Gallegos, P. Sampathkumar, A. Sandrock, G. Sanger-Johnson, M. Santander, S. Sarkar, M. Scarnera, M. Schaufel, H. Schieler, S. Schindler, L. Schlickmann, B. Schlüter, F. Schlüter, N. Schmeisser, T. Schmidt, A. Scholz, F. G. Schröder, S. Schwirn, S. Sclafani, D. Seckel, L. Seen, M. Seikh, S. Seunarine, P. A. Sevle Myhr, R. Shah, S. Shah, S. Shefali, N. Shimizu, B. Skrzypek, R. Snihur, J. Soedingrekso, D. Soldin, P. Soldin, G. Sommani, D. Song, C. Spannfellner, G. M. Spiczak, C. Spiering, J. Stachurska, M. Stamatikos, T. Stanev, T. Stezelberger, T. Stürwald, T. Stuttard, G. W. Sullivan, I. Taboada, S. Ter-Antonyan, A. Terliuk, A. Thakuri, M. Thiesmeyer, W. G. Thompson, J. Thwaites, S. Tilav, K. Tollefson, J. A. Torres, S. Toscano, D. Tosi, K. Upshaw, A. Vaidyanathan, N. Valtonen-Mattila, J. Valverde, J. Vandenbroucke, T. Van Eeden, N. van Eijndhoven, L. Van Rootselaar, J. van Santen, J. Vara, F. Varsi, M. Velazquez, M. Venugopal, M. Vereecken, S. Vergara Carrasco, S. Verpoest, D. Veske, A. Vijai, J. Villarreal, C. Walck, A. Wang, E. H. S. Warrick, C. Weaver, P. Weigel, A. Weindl, J. Weldert, A. Y. Wen, C. Wendt, J. Werthebach, M. Weyrauch, N. Whitehorn, C. H. Wiebusch, D. R. Williams, L. Witthaus, G. Wrede, X. W. Xu, J. P. Yanez, Y. Yao, E. Yildizci, S. Yoshida, F. Yu, S. Yu, T. Yuan, S. Yun-Cárcamo, A. Zander Jurowitzki, A. Zegarelli, S. Zhang, Z. Zhang, P. Zhelnin, P. Zilberman, C. Zilleruelo Cañas

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the Earth as a giant, glowing marble, but instead of looking at its surface, we want to see what's happening deep inside its core. For a long time, scientists have tried to peek inside by listening to the planet "ring" like a bell after an earthquake (seismology) or by weighing it with gravity. But there's a third, much stranger way to look inside: using ghost particles called neutrinos.

Think of neutrinos as the ultimate ghosts. They have no electric charge and barely interact with anything. They can zip right through the entire Earth without hitting a single atom, unless they are very energetic. But here's the trick: if they do have enough energy, they occasionally bump into matter, and the denser the matter they pass through, the more likely they are to get stopped.

This is exactly what the IceCube Neutrino Observatory did. Located deep in the ice at the South Pole, IceCube is like a giant, invisible net made of thousands of light sensors buried in a cubic kilometer of ice. Over 10.7 years (from 2011 to 2022), it caught 368,071 of these ghostly particles. Most of these were "atmospheric neutrinos"—ghosts created when cosmic rays (particles from space) hit our atmosphere and created a shower of debris.

The scientists treated the Earth like a set of five nested, uniform-density shells (like an onion with five layers). They looked at how many neutrinos made it through the Earth from different angles.

  • Neutrinos coming from straight down (traveling through the whole planet) had to pass through the densest parts.
  • Neutrinos coming from the side only skimmed the outer layers.

By counting how many neutrinos disappeared (got "attenuated") at different energies and angles, the team could figure out how dense each layer of the Earth is. It's like shining a flashlight through a foggy room; if the light dims a lot, the fog is thick. If it dims a little, the fog is thin.

The Big Findings
The team found that the density of the Earth's layers, as measured by these neutrino ghosts, matches up very well with what we already know from earthquakes and gravity.

  • They measured the Earth's total mass to be 7.25 × 10²⁴ kg. The "real" mass (measured by gravity) is 5.97 × 10²⁴ kg. While their number is a bit higher, the real value still falls within the range of what their measurement suggests (specifically, within the 95% confidence interval).
  • They also calculated the Earth's "polar moment of inertia" (a measure of how hard it is to spin the Earth) to be 1.05 × 10³⁸ kg m². Again, this is close to the standard value of 8.01 × 10³⁸ kg m², and the standard value sits comfortably inside their range of uncertainty.

What They Didn't Find (and What They Ruled Out)
The paper explicitly rules out the idea that the Earth is empty or has a completely different density structure than we think. The data strongly rejects the "vacuum Earth" hypothesis (the idea that there is no mass inside the Earth). The measured mass is more than (five standard deviations) away from zero, meaning it is statistically impossible for the Earth to be empty based on this data.

They also tested whether their results were just random noise. They ran simulations where they pretended the Earth had the standard density and saw what kind of "fake" results would pop up. The real data fit right in the middle of those simulations, suggesting the results are solid and not just a fluke.

How Sure Are They?
The authors are very confident that neutrinos can see the Earth's interior, but they are careful about the exact numbers. They describe their results as "consistent" with the standard Earth model (called PREM). They admit their numbers are a little higher than the gravity-based numbers, but they attribute this to known uncertainties in how neutrinos interact with matter and how the detector works. They didn't claim to have "solved" the Earth's interior; instead, they showed that neutrinos provide a new, independent way to check our maps of the planet.

The Future
The paper suggests that with bigger detectors and more data, we could get even sharper pictures. Right now, they used a "five-shell" model, but they also tested a finer "eight-shell" model to see if they could get more detail. The results were stable, but the current data is best described by the simpler five-layer onion.

In short, this study proves that we can use high-energy neutrinos to "X-ray" the Earth. It's a new tool in the toolbox, one that uses the weak force instead of gravity or sound waves, and it confirms that our current understanding of the Earth's deep interior is on the right track.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →