Both directions of Fuglede's conjecture fail in dimension two
This paper resolves the long-standing open problem in dimension two by constructing explicit counterexamples in a finite Abelian group and lifting them to , thereby proving that both directions of Fuglede's conjecture fail.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine you are a master architect trying to cover a floor. You have a specific shape of tile, and you want to know if you can cover the entire infinite floor using only that shape, sliding it around without any overlaps or gaps. This is the art of tiling. Now, imagine you are a musician trying to play a song inside a room. You want to know if you can pick a set of musical notes (frequencies) that, when played together, perfectly describe every possible sound inside that room without any redundancy. This is the art of being spectral.
For decades, mathematicians wondered if these two very different skills were actually the same thing. Could a shape that is perfect for tiling a floor always be perfect for creating a musical spectrum, and vice versa? This idea, known as Fuglede's conjecture, linked the geometry of shapes with the physics of sound waves. It was a beautiful theory that held true for simple, one-dimensional lines and for many nice, round, or boxy shapes. However, as mathematicians looked at more complex, jagged, or high-dimensional spaces, the theory began to crack. They found shapes that could tile but couldn't sing, and shapes that could sing but couldn't tile. But a stubborn mystery remained: did this failure happen in the flat, two-dimensional world we live in—the plane? For a long time, no one could prove it either way.
This paper by Tao Zhang answers that question with a definitive "yes." The author proves that in two dimensions, the connection between tiling and music is broken. The paper constructs two very specific, somewhat bizarre shapes. The first shape is a perfect tiler—it can cover a grid without gaps—but it is "tone-deaf," meaning it cannot be described by a clean set of musical notes. The second shape is a perfect "singer," capable of generating a full musical spectrum, but it is a terrible tiler that cannot cover a grid without overlapping or leaving holes.
To understand how this was done, think of the mathematician's strategy as a game of "zooming out." First, the author built these tricky shapes inside a small, finite world made of a grid of numbers (specifically a group called ). In this tiny, finite universe, the author showed that the "tiling" shape had three different ways to be completed into a full grid, but none of those completions shared a common musical key. Conversely, the "singing" shape had three different musical keys, but none of them could help it tile the grid.
The magic happens in the next step. The author used a mathematical "transference principle" to lift these small, finite shapes up into the real, infinite two-dimensional plane. Imagine taking a small, pixelated stamp and pressing it onto a giant sheet of graph paper, repeating it over and over to create a massive, jagged mosaic. The paper proves that if the small stamp fails to be a perfect singer or a perfect tiler in the finite world, the giant mosaic will fail in the exact same way in the real world.
The result is a pair of explicit counterexamples. The first is a bounded shape made of 60 points in the finite group, which lifts to a massive shape made of 564,540 unit squares that tiles the plane but has no spectrum. The second is a shape made of 60 points in the finite group, which lifts to a massive shape made of 564,540 unit squares that has a spectrum but cannot tile the plane. By lifting these to the real plane, the author creates these massive shapes to settle the debate: in two dimensions, being able to tile a floor and being able to sing a song are two completely different talents. A shape can have one, the other, both, or neither, and there is no rule that forces them to go together. The conjecture that they were equivalent is false.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.