and LFV decays in a left-right model with inverse seesaw neutrinos
This paper demonstrates that a left-right model with inverse seesaw neutrinos can simultaneously explain the observed discrepancies in the anomalous magnetic moments of electrons and muons via heavy singly charged Higgs boson contributions while naturally suppressing lepton-flavor violating decays due to the underlying gauge symmetry.
Original paper dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the vast landscape of modern physics, there is a persistent puzzle regarding the behavior of subatomic particles known as leptons. These include the electron, which orbits the nucleus of every atom, and its heavier cousins, the muon and the tau. For decades, scientists have measured a specific property of these particles called their magnetic moment, which essentially describes how they spin and interact with magnetic fields. The Standard Model, our best current theory of how the universe works at the smallest scales, predicts a very precise value for this spin. However, recent experiments have revealed a small but significant gap between the theoretical prediction and the actual measurement, particularly for the muon. This discrepancy suggests that there might be unseen particles or forces influencing these leptons, acting like a hidden hand that nudges their spin just slightly off the expected path. To solve this mystery, physicists often look for new theories that extend the Standard Model, proposing the existence of heavier, undiscovered particles that could bridge the gap between what we calculate and what we observe.
A team of researchers has recently explored one such theoretical framework to see if it can explain these anomalies without breaking other established rules of physics. They focused on a specific model that introduces a new symmetry between the muon and the tau, while also proposing a mechanism to explain why neutrinos have mass. This model includes a new type of particle called a singly charged Higgs boson, which is heavier than the familiar Higgs boson discovered a decade ago. The researchers performed detailed calculations to see if the interactions involving this heavy particle could generate the extra "push" needed to match the experimental data for the muon and the electron. Their work involved mapping out every possible way these new particles could influence the magnetic moments of charged leptons through quantum loops, a process where particles briefly pop in and out of existence to affect the behavior of their neighbors.
The study found that this specific model can indeed accommodate the observed discrepancies. The calculations showed that the exchange of the heavy singly charged Higgs boson can produce a contribution large enough to explain the difference seen in the muon's magnetic moment, which is on the order of one part in a billion. Similarly, it can account for the smaller but still significant difference observed in the electron's magnetic moment. Crucially, the researchers demonstrated that this explanation works without violating other strict experimental limits. In many theories, a mechanism that fixes the magnetic moment problem often leads to unwanted side effects, such as particles decaying into other particles in ways that have never been seen. For instance, a muon might spontaneously turn into an electron and a photon, or a heavy tau particle might decay into a muon and an electron.
However, in this specific model, the new symmetry between the muon and the tau acts as a protective shield. The researchers found that the rates for these forbidden decays are suppressed to such a tiny degree that they are effectively invisible to current detectors. This means the model can solve the magnetic moment puzzle while remaining consistent with the fact that we do not see these rare decays happening in nature. The study also looked at the behavior of the Higgs boson and the Z boson, which are carriers of fundamental forces, checking if they would decay into different types of leptons in violation of conservation laws. The results were consistent: the model predicts that these decays are so rare that they are far below the threshold of what current experiments can detect.
The researchers also examined how the properties of the new particles, such as their masses and the strength of their interactions, relate to the size of the magnetic moment effect. They discovered that to get the right amount of correction for the muon and tau, the interactions must be relatively strong, but this is balanced by the masses of the new particles being quite heavy. For the electron, the effect can be achieved even with weaker interactions, provided the mass of the new particle is within a certain range. The study confirms that there is a viable region of parameters where the model works for all three types of leptons simultaneously. This suggests that the universe could indeed contain these heavy particles and the new symmetry they rely on, offering a plausible explanation for the long-standing anomalies in lepton physics without contradicting the wealth of data we already have from particle accelerators.
Ultimately, this work provides a concrete example of how a specific extension of our current theories can resolve experimental tensions. By carefully balancing the contributions of new heavy particles against the constraints of known physics, the researchers showed that the observed deviations in the magnetic moments of the electron and muon do not necessarily require a complete overhaul of our understanding. Instead, they could be the subtle fingerprints of a heavier, hidden sector of particles that respects the delicate symmetries of the muon and tau. While this remains a theoretical proposal that awaits experimental confirmation, it narrows the search for new physics by identifying a specific set of conditions and particle behaviors that future experiments could look for. The findings serve as a guide, telling physicists exactly what kind of signals to expect if nature has indeed chosen this particular path to explain the quirks of the subatomic world.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.