Assessing the Level of Readiness for Newborn Care in the Neonatal Department of JHPIEGO-Supported Hospitals in the Northern Province of Rwanda: A Cross-Sectional Study

Imagine the first few weeks of a newborn's life as a high-stakes relay race. The baby is the runner, and the medical team is the relay squad passing the baton of care. For this race to be won, the track needs to be smooth, the runners need to be trained, and the team needs the right gear—like a perfectly tuned baton and a water station that never runs dry. In the world of public health, this "track" is called service readiness. It's not just about having a hospital building; it's about whether that building is actually stocked with the right medicines, whether the doctors and nurses have been trained to use them, and if they have the latest rulebooks (guidelines) to follow when things go wrong.

In many parts of the world, especially in low- and middle-income countries, this relay race is often run on a broken track. Too many babies drop the baton because the team is missing a crucial piece of equipment or hasn't practiced the right moves. This is why scientists and doctors are constantly checking the "readiness" of hospitals. They want to know: Is the track ready? Are the runners prepared? If we can fix the gaps in the track, we can save lives. This is the big question that drives the story in the paper you are about to read.

---

The Great Hospital Check-Up: A Story of Seven Hospitals

Think of a group of seven hospitals in Northern Rwanda as seven different teams preparing for a massive, life-or-death competition. These aren't just any teams; they are all supported by a big organization called JHPIEGO, which helps them get ready. The researchers decided to act like a team of curious inspectors, visiting each hospital to see if they were truly "ready" to take care of sick newborns. They didn't just look at the buildings; they checked the toolboxes, the training manuals, and the team rosters.

They used a special checklist based on a global standard (like a giant, international rulebook for hospital readiness) to give each hospital a score. To pass the test and be called "Ready," a hospital needed to score at least 75%. If they scored lower, they were considered "Not Ready," meaning they had some serious gaps to fill before they could safely handle the most fragile runners.

The Final Scoreboard
When the inspectors tallied up the scores, the average readiness for these seven hospitals was 78.50%. That's a passing grade, but it's not a perfect 100. It's like a student who passed the math test but still needs to study harder for the next one. The scores varied quite a bit between the hospitals. The top performers were Byumba Level Two Teaching Hospital with 86% and Ruhengeri Level Two Teaching Hospital with 85%. At the other end of the spectrum, Gatonde District Hospital had the lowest score at 67%, meaning it was the least prepared of the group.

The Three Big Categories: The Track, The Gear, and The Team
The researchers broke the readiness down into three main categories, kind of like checking a car before a race: the road (Infrastructure), the engine and tools (Equipment and Medicines), and the drivers (Human Resources).

1. The Road (Infrastructure): This was the strongest part of the race. The hospitals scored an average of 86.1% here. Most had electricity, clean hand-washing stations, and special rooms for keeping babies warm. It was like having a smooth, paved track.
2. The Gear (Equipment and Medicines): This area was a bit shaky. The average score was 73.44%, but when you look closer at just the equipment, the score dropped to 68.32%. While the hospitals had some good tools, they were missing some critical ones. For example, zero of the seven hospitals had special oxygen flowmeters that can deliver very low flows, and zero had plastic bags specifically for keeping tiny, premature babies warm. It's like having a race car with a great engine but missing the seatbelts and the spare tire.
3. The Team (Human Resources and Training): This was the biggest weak spot. The average score here was only 65.18%. While the hospitals had staff on duty, they often lacked specialized training. Only 28.6% of the hospitals had nurses specifically trained as neonatal nurses, and only 14.3% kept proper records of who had been trained. It's like having a team of runners who are fast, but only a few of them know how to handle the tricky parts of the track.

The Rulebooks
Interestingly, the hospitals were great at having the rulebooks. The "Guidelines and Protocols" category scored a massive 97.14%. They had the manuals! But having a manual doesn't mean you know how to use it if you haven't practiced. The researchers found that even though the books were there, the team often lacked the training to follow them perfectly.

City vs. Country: Is Location Everything?
You might wonder if the big city hospitals were doing much better than the small rural ones. The researchers checked this carefully. They found that the urban hospitals did have slightly higher scores (averaging 85.5%) compared to the rural ones (averaging 76.8%). However, when they ran the math, this difference wasn't statistically significant. In plain English, this means that while the city hospitals looked a little better on paper, the gap wasn't big enough to say for sure that location was the main reason for the difference. The same was true when comparing different types of hospitals (teaching, provincial, and district); the differences in their scores were not strong enough to be considered a clear pattern.

What Was Missing?
The study highlighted some very specific items that were completely absent across the board. No hospital had:

• Oxygen flowmeters for low-flow delivery.
• Plastic bags for preterm thermoregulation (keeping tiny babies warm).
• Special breastfeeding pillows.
• Portable X-ray machines.
• Supplement drugs like Vitamin D, iron, and multivitamins.

Other items were very rare, found in less than half the hospitals, such as endotracheal tubes (used for breathing), laryngoscopes (tools to look at the throat), and blood warmers.

The Bottom Line
This study suggests that while the hospitals in Northern Rwanda have made a lot of progress—especially in building the "track" and stocking the "rulebooks"—they are still missing some crucial "gear" and "training." The average readiness is good, but the gaps in equipment and specialized staff training are like potholes on the race track that could cause a crash.

The researchers emphasize that having a hospital building isn't enough. To truly save newborns, the health system needs to focus on filling those specific gaps: training more specialized nurses and making sure every hospital has the right tools, like the missing oxygen flowmeters and warming bags. Until those gaps are filled, the race for newborn survival will still have some dangerous bumps in the road.