← Latest papers
📄 social_science

Resilience in Disaster Survivors: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS) in Turkish 

This study validates the Turkish adaptation of the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS) through a methodological design involving 1,206 survivors, confirming its five-factor structure, high reliability, and suitability as a culturally appropriate tool for assessing post-disaster psychological resilience in Turkey.

Original authors: Ali DOĞAN, Nurçin KÜÇÜK KENT

Published 2026-07-07
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Ali DOĞAN, Nurçin KÜÇÜK KENT

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine a massive storm hits your neighborhood. Some people's houses are damaged, but they bounce back quickly, helping each other and finding solutions. Others feel overwhelmed, stuck, and struggle to recover. The difference between these two groups isn't just about how strong their houses are; it's about their internal "shock absorbers" and their ability to adapt.

This research paper is about building a better tool to measure those shock absorbers.

Here is the story of the study, broken down simply:

1. The Problem: We Needed a Better Ruler

The researchers wanted to measure "resilience" (the ability to bounce back) and "adaptation" (how well someone adjusts) in people who have survived disasters like earthquakes or floods.

They found an existing tool called the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS). Think of this scale as a ruler designed in another country to measure height. The problem? If you try to measure a Turkish person with a ruler made for a different culture, the numbers might not make sense. The "ruler" might not fit the local shape of the problem.

So, the team from Gümüşhane University decided to translate and reshape this ruler specifically for Turkey. They wanted to make sure it measured what it was supposed to measure in the Turkish language and culture.

2. The Process: Tuning the Instrument

To make this new "Turkish ruler" accurate, they didn't just translate the words; they tuned the instrument like a guitar.

  • The Translation: They translated the questions from English to Turkish and back again to ensure the meaning stayed the same.
  • The Expert Panel: They asked 15 experts (like disaster managers, doctors, and psychologists) to review the questions. It was like having a panel of judges taste-test a new recipe to make sure the spices were right.
  • The Pilot Test: They tried the scale on a small group of 407 people first. It was like a dress rehearsal. They found that some questions were confusing or didn't fit well, so they removed or rewrote them.
  • The Main Event: Finally, they tested the refined scale on a large group of 1,206 people who had actually experienced disasters in cities like İzmir, Trabzon, and Malatya.

3. The Result: A Perfectly Fitted Tool

After all the testing, the researchers found that the Turkish version of the scale was excellent.

  • The Structure: The scale is made of 27 questions (down from the original 43) that group together into 5 distinct "buckets" or dimensions. Think of these buckets as the five pillars holding up a resilient person:

    1. Physical Resources: Do you have a safe house, insurance, and money for rent?
    2. Supportive Relationships: Do you have friends and family you can talk to?
    3. Problem Solving: Are you good at finding solutions when things go wrong?
    4. Stress Regulation: Can you manage your anger or sadness when things get tough?
    5. Optimism: Do you believe things will get better in the future?
  • The Score: The math showed that this scale explains 81.9% of the reasons why people adapt differently. In the world of research, that is a huge score, like getting an A+ on a difficult exam. The tool is reliable (consistent) and valid (measures what it claims to measure).

4. What the Scale Revealed: Who Bounces Back?

When the researchers looked at the scores of the 1,206 participants, they found some interesting patterns about who tends to have stronger "shock absorbers":

  • Money and Jobs Matter: People with higher incomes, university degrees, and stable jobs (like civil servants) generally scored higher on resilience. It's like having a bigger safety net; if you have resources, it's easier to recover.
  • Preparation Pays Off: People who had taken disaster training or kept an emergency kit in their home scored much higher. It's the difference between having a fire extinguisher ready and hoping the fire department arrives in time.
  • The "Support" Paradox: Interestingly, people who said they received post-disaster support actually scored lower on resilience than those who didn't. The researchers suggest this might mean that those who needed the most help were the ones who received it, or perhaps that relying too much on outside help can sometimes make people feel less capable of helping themselves.
  • Displacement Hurts: People who were forced to leave their homes scored lower than those who stayed put. Losing your home is a massive blow to your ability to adapt.
  • Gender and Location: Men scored slightly higher than women, and people in Trabzon scored higher than those in İzmir or Malatya. This suggests that local culture, infrastructure, and perhaps how different communities handle stress play a big role.

5. The Bottom Line

The paper concludes that the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS) is now a trusted, accurate tool for Turkey.

Just as a doctor needs a reliable thermometer to check a fever, disaster managers and psychologists now have a reliable "thermometer" to check how well a community is recovering. The study confirms that resilience isn't just a vague feeling; it's a mix of having money, good friends, a plan, and the belief that tomorrow will be better.

The authors suggest that if officials use this scale, they can quickly spot who is struggling (like those with low income or no emergency kit) and offer them the right kind of help to build their own "shock absorbers" for the next storm.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →