Pan-Turkism in Crisis: Genetic Testing and Turkish Ethnic Identity Collapse in Iranian Digital Discourse

Imagine the internet as a giant, noisy town square where people shout about who they are and where they come from. For a long time, some groups have told a very specific story: "We are all one big family with the exact same blood, stretching back thousands of years without any mixing." This is a story about Pan-Turkism, a political idea that claims all Turkish-speaking people are biologically the same ancient race. But in the real world, science has a different tool for checking family trees: genetic testing. Think of DNA tests like a super-accurate family photo album that shows exactly who your great-great-grandparents were, revealing if you have ancestors from many different places, not just one.

Usually, these scientific facts stay in textbooks, far away from the shouting in the town square. But recently, something changed. Direct-to-consumer DNA tests became viral sensations, with people posting their results online like it was a reality TV show. This paper explores what happened when these "family photos" clashed with the "family stories" in the digital town square, specifically looking at how Persian-speaking users (mostly Iranians) reacted when Turkish citizens posted their DNA results. The study asks a simple but big question: When people see hard evidence that contradicts their national myths, do they change their minds, get angry, or find a new way to tell their story?

---

The Great DNA Drama: When Myths Meet Microscopes

This paper is like a detective story, but instead of solving a crime, the author, Ehsan Shahghasemi, is investigating a massive identity crisis happening on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). The case started when viral videos and posts showed Turkish citizens taking DNA tests. The results were shocking to many: instead of showing a "pure" ancient Turkic lineage, the tests revealed a mix of Arab, Persian, Balkan, and other ancestries.

The author analyzed 1,073 posts from Persian-speaking users to see how they reacted to this news. It wasn't just a quiet discussion; it was a digital storm. The study found that these users didn't just read the results; they used them as weapons, jokes, and mirrors to reflect their own identities.

The Main Discovery: The Myth Buckles

The biggest finding is that these viral DNA tests dealt a serious blow to the idea of "pure" Turkish descent. The study identified fifteen different themes in the posts, but one giant cluster stood out above all the rest: Ethnic Identity Collapse.

Imagine a house of cards built on the idea that "we are all one pure bloodline." When the DNA results came in, that house didn't just wobble; it crumbled. The study found that 399 posts (the largest group) were about this collapse. People were reacting with a mix of fury, anger, and sometimes even ironic laughter. One user even challenged the idea directly, asking, "Suppose our DNA tests show we're not Turkic, but we still choose to identify as Turkic. What are you going to do about it?" This shows that for many, identity is a choice, not just a genetic fact.

The Asymmetry: One Side's Crisis, The Other's Victory

Here is where the story gets really interesting. The reaction wasn't the same for everyone. It was a tale of two very different crowds.

For the people whose identity was being challenged (those believing in the pure Turkic myth), the news was a disaster. It was like finding out your family heirloom is actually a cheap replica. The study found that 14.6% of the posts were Angry and 14% were Furious. These users felt their history was being attacked.

But for the Persian-speaking users watching from the sidelines, it was a different story. They didn't feel threatened; they felt vindicated. To them, the DNA results were like a "Gotcha!" moment. They saw the tests as proof that their own understanding of history was correct. The study notes that 19.3% of posts were Happy and 8.2% were Delighted. They weren't just happy for themselves; they were happy to see the rival myth exposed. One user joked, "They conduct DNA tests in Turkey and find out none of them are real Turks," treating the scientific data as a victory lap.

The Five Emotions of the Digital Square

The author broke down the feelings in these 1,073 posts into five main buckets:

• Neutral (43.9%): The biggest group. These weren't boring posts; they were often sarcastic, skeptical, or just observing the chaos with a raised eyebrow.
• Happy (19.3%) & Delighted (8.2%): The celebratory crowd, mostly cheering for the exposure of the rival myth.
• Angry (14.6%) & Furious (14%): The defensive crowd, lashing out at the science or the people sharing it.

The Five Ways People Tried to Fix the Broken Story

When the DNA results didn't fit the story, people didn't just give up. They tried to patch the hole in five different ways, which the study mapped out as themes:

1. Denying the Science: Some users tried to say the tests were fake or "pseudoscience." It was like saying, "The photo album is a forgery!"
2. The Insult Factory: A huge chunk of the conversation (147 posts) turned into pure name-calling and insults. It wasn't about facts anymore; it was about who could be the meanest.
3. The "History is Better" Argument: Some users said, "Even if the DNA says one thing, our history and culture say another." They tried to swap biology for stories of ancient empires and conquests.
4. The "We Are All Mixed" Defense: A few users tried to say, "So what if we are mixed? Everyone is!" to make the specific results seem less important.
5. The Political Weapon: Many users used the DNA results to make political points, saying things like, "This proves Iran belongs to Turks" or "This proves the other side is lying."

The Core of the Chaos

The study used a special computer map to see how these ideas connected. It found that the whole mess revolved around three main ideas: Ethnic Identity Collapse, Cultural Reductionism (simplifying complex culture into simple labels), and Genetic Reductionism (thinking genes are the only thing that matters).

When people saw the DNA results, they didn't think, "Wow, history is complex." Instead, they rushed to simplify things even more. They tried to force the messy reality of genetics into their neat, old stories. The study suggests that in the digital world, science isn't just a neutral fact; it's a performance. People use it to feel proud, to mock others, or to draw lines in the sand about who belongs and who doesn't.

The Bottom Line

The paper concludes that these viral DNA tests have done something powerful: they have made it impossible to ignore the gap between the myth of a "pure" nation and the messy reality of human genetics. For the Pan-Turkist narrative, which relied on the idea of an unbroken, pure bloodline, this was a crisis. For the Persian-speaking observers, it was a confirmation of their own views.

The study suggests that in our post-truth world, where emotions run high, scientific facts don't always change minds. Instead, they become tools. If the facts fit your story, you cheer. If they don't, you get angry, call the science fake, or just insult the messenger. The DNA test didn't just reveal ancestry; it revealed how much people are willing to fight to protect the stories they tell themselves about who they are.