"Nobody knew it was going to be that bad": An ethnographic investigation into providing pregnancy care amidst Hurricane Helene in Western North Carolina
This ethnographic study of Western North Carolina's pregnancy care response to Hurricane Helene reveals that a lack of pre-existing disaster plans and chronic resource shortages forced reliance on unsustainable individual adaptability, leading to disrupted care and provider burnout, which underscores the urgent need for expanded baseline access and robust preparedness strategies to build resilient maternal health systems.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
When a storm of unprecedented force strikes a region, the immediate danger is often visible in the form of rising water and collapsing bridges. Yet, for people who are pregnant, the threat extends far beyond the physical destruction. Their health depends on a steady, predictable rhythm of medical checkups, timely interventions, and access to specialists who can monitor the delicate changes of a developing life. This rhythm is easily broken when the infrastructure that supports it—roads, electricity, phone lines, and hospitals—shuts down. In the wake of such environmental disasters, the question is not just whether people can survive the storm, but whether the systems designed to protect the most vulnerable can survive the aftermath. Researchers have long known that disasters increase risks for maternal health, but they have struggled to understand the human machinery behind the response: how doctors, midwives, and community helpers actually navigate the chaos when the rules they rely on no longer apply.
A team of researchers from Purdue University set out to answer this question by listening to the people who were there. They focused their attention on Western North Carolina, a rugged, largely rural landscape where access to reproductive care was already difficult before the storm arrived. In September 2024, Hurricane Helene made landfall, bringing heavy rains that triggered severe flooding and landslides, isolating entire communities and cutting off power and water for weeks. The city of Asheville, for instance, went without clean running water for two months. To understand how pregnancy care functioned in this vacuum, the researchers conducted twenty-five in-depth interviews with key figures involved in the response. These participants included obstetricians, midwives, birth doulas, and social workers who had been trying to care for pregnant people during and after the hurricane. The researchers did not look at hospital records or statistical trends; instead, they asked these workers to describe their experiences, the choices they made, and the obstacles they faced, recording and analyzing their stories to find common patterns.
What emerged from these conversations was a picture of a system that was caught entirely off guard. The researchers found that there were no pre-existing plans for how to provide care under these specific, constrained conditions. One participant, a patient coordinator, summed up the collective shock with a simple statement: "Nobody knew it was going to be that bad." Because no one had a blueprint for disaster, providers were left to improvise. In large hospitals and state-run clinics, the lack of a plan created a paralyzing confusion. Doctors and nurses found themselves unable to tell patients when services would resume or where they could go for help. They were trapped in a double bind: they could not perform non-emergency care, yet they had no information to give to the people waiting for it. This left pregnant people missing critical windows of care, with providers feeling helpless as they watched their patients drift away without a clear path forward.
In contrast, the community-based workers—such as independent midwives and doulas who often operate outside of large hospital systems—found their usual way of working to be an advantage. These providers are accustomed to being flexible, filling gaps in care, and responding directly to the needs of their clients. When the storm hit, they used this same agility to adapt. One midwife described the experience as an extreme version of her daily work, where she and her colleagues quickly organized to share information and locate patients who had been cut off from their doctors. Because they were not bound by the rigid policies of a large corporation, they could make their own decisions, driving to clients' homes to check on them or coordinating resources on the fly. However, this flexibility came with a heavy cost. While these community workers could pivot quickly, they were doing so in a landscape where resources were already scarce, and they were often the only ones left to bridge the gap between patients and a broken system.
The most striking finding of the study was the immense burden placed on individuals to compensate for the failure of the system. With no institutional guidance, the responsibility for care coordination fell entirely on the shoulders of the providers. They became the ones who had to find transportation for patients who had lost their cars, raise money for those who needed to relocate, and act as the only link between isolated families and the outside world. One birth worker described spending hours on the phone, trying to connect patients with any available provider, while another noted that she had to drive her flooded car across several counties just to ensure pregnant people were seen. This shift from direct care to constant navigation and crisis management was exhausting. The researchers found that many participants were experiencing symptoms of burnout, a state of emotional and physical depletion caused by prolonged stress. Some had to pause their services entirely to recover, while others were left managing their own trauma from the storm while trying to care for others.
The study suggests that the ability of pregnancy care systems to adapt during a disaster is not just a matter of individual heroism, but is shaped by the structural conditions in which they operate. The lack of preparedness and the shortage of resources constrained the response capacity of everyone involved. While individuals stepped up to take on greater responsibilities, the researchers found that relying on this kind of individual adaptability is not a sustainable solution. It leads to burnout and threatens the long-term ability of the workforce to respond to future crises. The authors argue that expanding the baseline access to pregnancy care in regions like Western North Carolina is critical. If the system is stronger before the storm hits, it will be better equipped to withstand the shock. They also recommend that future preparedness plans must include alternative ways for patients and providers to communicate when phone lines and internet are down, ensuring that the connection between a pregnant person and their support network is not severed by the next disaster.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.