← Latest papers
📄 social science

Impact of The Repeated Reading Method on Eliminating Reading Difficulties Among Fourth-Grade Primary School Students

This action research study conducted in Türkiye demonstrates that a two-month repeated reading intervention significantly improved the reading performance, reduced oral errors, and enhanced comprehension skills of two fourth-grade students with reading difficulties, elevating their reading levels from frustration to instructional and independent.

Original authors: Cihat Çolak, Muamber Yılmaz

Published 2026-09-10
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Cihat Çolak, Muamber Yılmaz

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Reading is more than just sounding out words on a page; it is the act of building meaning from those symbols. For a child to read well, they must first recognize words quickly and accurately. When a reader struggles to identify a word, their brain spends all its energy trying to figure out the letters, leaving no room to understand the story. This bottleneck often leads to a cycle where the child reads slowly, makes many mistakes, and eventually stops enjoying the activity altogether. In the early years of school, this struggle can be discouraging, causing children to feel left behind by their peers. Teachers and parents often want to help but may not know which tools work best to break this cycle. One approach that has gained attention for its ability to rebuild confidence and skill is the repeated reading method, a technique where a student reads the same short passage aloud multiple times with guidance until the words flow naturally.

A recent study conducted in Bartın, Turkey, put this method to the test with two fourth-grade students who were struggling significantly with reading. These children, identified as Ö.T. and Y.T., had no vision or hearing problems and no intellectual disabilities, yet they found their grade-level textbooks nearly impossible to navigate. Before the intervention began, the researchers assessed their abilities using a standard diagnostic tool that measures how many errors a child makes while reading aloud and how well they understand what they have read. The results were stark: when asked to read texts meant for their own grade level, both students performed at what experts call the "frustration level." This means they were making so many mistakes and understanding so little that the task was overwhelming. Even when the researchers gave them easier texts from the third-grade curriculum, the students were only at the "instructional level," meaning they could read with help but still made frequent errors and needed constant support to understand the story.

To address this, the researchers designed a two-month program based on the repeated reading method. The intervention took place three times a week, with each session dedicated to one student reading alone with a researcher. The process was simple but rigorous. First, the researcher would read a word aloud, and the student would repeat it while looking at the printed text. This was done three times for every single word in a story. Once the student had practiced every word, they would read the entire story aloud on their own. If they stumbled, the researcher provided immediate correction. Afterward, the student answered questions to check their understanding. Over the course of the study, the students worked through twenty-four different stories, and they also took home a book each week to practice on their own. The goal was not just to memorize the stories, but to build automaticity so that recognizing words became second nature, freeing up their minds to focus on the meaning.

The results of this focused practice were dramatic. After the two months, the researchers tested the students again. When the students read the easier third-grade stories, their performance jumped from the instructional level to the "independent level." This is a significant shift, meaning they could now read these texts fluently and understand them without needing help. Their error rates dropped sharply; for example, one student reduced their reading mistakes by more than half when reading third-grade texts. Even more encouraging was their progress with the harder, fourth-grade texts. Before the program, they were stuck in the frustration zone. Afterward, they moved up to the instructional level, meaning they could now tackle their own grade-level material with support, making far fewer mistakes and understanding much more of what they read. Their ability to answer questions about the stories improved drastically, with one student showing a three-hundred percent increase in comprehension scores for fourth-grade texts.

The study suggests that the key to this improvement was the sheer volume of practice and the immediate feedback the students received. By hearing the correct pronunciation and repeating it until it felt natural, the students stopped struggling with individual words and started focusing on the story itself. The researchers noted that while the students improved, the degree of change varied slightly between them, likely due to their individual personalities and motivation levels. However, the overall trend was clear: the repeated reading method successfully reduced the number of errors the children made and helped them understand the text much better. The authors conclude that this approach is a powerful tool for teachers and parents, offering a structured way to help children who are stuck in the frustration of learning to read. By giving struggling readers the chance to practice the same material until it clicks, educators can help them move from feeling defeated to feeling capable.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →