← Latest papers
📄 earth_science

Large-Scale Patterns Associated With Regional Variations in Florida Hurricane Landfalls

This study utilizes reanalysis data to identify distinct large-scale synoptic patterns and climate index influences, such as the NAO and PNA, that drive regional variations in Florida hurricane landfalls and near misses, revealing significant historical spikes but no long-term trends.

Original authors: Andrew Hazelton

Published 2026-09-08
📖 6 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Andrew Hazelton

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Hurricanes are not random wanderers; they are travelers guided by the invisible rivers of air that sweep across the globe. To understand where a storm will go, meteorologists look at the large-scale patterns of high and low pressure that act as a steering wheel for these massive systems. One of the most important of these patterns is the subtropical high, a giant dome of high pressure that sits over the Atlantic Ocean and often pushes storms westward toward the United States. When this dome is strong and positioned just right, it can drive a hurricane straight into a coastline. When it is weak or shifted, the storm might turn away, skirting the edge of the land or curving out to sea. For the state of Florida, which has the longest coastline in the continental United States, knowing exactly how these atmospheric patterns shift is a matter of life and death. The state is so large that a storm hitting the east coast often follows a completely different path than one striking the west coast or the narrow strip of land known as the Panhandle in the north.

A new study by Andrew Hazelton, a researcher at the University of Miami and NOAA, digs deep into the history of these storms to map out the specific atmospheric setups that lead to landfalls in different parts of Florida. By breaking down decades of hurricane data into four distinct groups—storms that hit the East Coast, storms that hit the West Coast, storms that hit the Panhandle, and storms that came very close to the East Coast but missed—the study reveals that the weather patterns driving these events are surprisingly different. The research uses computer models of past weather, known as reanalysis data, to reconstruct the air pressure maps from the 1800s up to the present day. This allows scientists to see the invisible forces that were pushing storms toward or away from the state, even for hurricanes that occurred before modern satellites existed. The goal was to move beyond the simple idea of "East Coast versus Gulf Coast" and understand the subtle atmospheric differences that determine whether a storm makes landfall or slips just past the shore.

The study found that the key to predicting where a storm will hit often lies thousands of miles away, in the weather patterns over the western United States and the Pacific Ocean. For hurricanes that make landfall on Florida's East Coast or in the Panhandle, the atmosphere typically features a deep dip, or trough, in the jet stream over the Rocky Mountains. This dip helps create a strong ridge of high pressure over New England, which acts like a wall, preventing the storm from turning north and forcing it to drive straight into the Florida coast. In contrast, storms that miss the East Coast or hit the West Coast are associated with a different setup: a ridge of high pressure over the western United States and a dip over the East. This configuration weakens the high-pressure wall over New England, allowing storms to turn northward before they reach the state or to be steered into the Gulf of Mexico and up the West Coast.

To prove that these patterns are real and not just a statistical fluke, the researchers looked at specific, famous hurricanes that followed similar paths but ended up in different places. They compared Hurricane Floyd in 1999, which missed Florida and hit the Carolinas, with Hurricane Frances in 2004, which struck the Florida East Coast. Both storms started in a similar location in the Atlantic, but the weather patterns over the western United States were different. For Floyd, a ridge of high pressure over the Rockies helped push a dip in the jet stream toward the East, eroding the high-pressure wall that would have kept the storm on a collision course with Florida. For Frances, the pattern was reversed, with a dip over the Rockies and a strong high over New England, which guided the storm directly into the state. A similar comparison between Hurricane Ian, which hit the West Coast, and Hurricane Michael, which hit the Panhandle, showed that the same atmospheric rules apply even to storms coming from the Gulf of Mexico.

The study also examined how these patterns relate to well-known climate cycles, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Pacific-North American pattern. These are large-scale swings in weather that happen over months or years. The researchers found that when the North Atlantic Oscillation is in a positive phase, it tends to strengthen the high-pressure dome over the Atlantic, making East Coast and Panhandle landfalls more likely. When it is in a negative phase, the high pressure weakens, and storms are more likely to miss the East Coast or hit the West Coast. Similarly, the Pacific-North American pattern, which describes the shape of the jet stream over North America, plays a crucial role. A negative phase of this pattern favors East Coast and Panhandle landfalls, while a positive phase favors West Coast landfalls and near-misses.

Despite finding these clear links between atmospheric patterns and where storms hit, the study did not find a steady, long-term trend in the number of landfalls for any specific region over the last century. The data shows that the number of storms hitting different parts of Florida goes up and down in cycles, with big spikes in the 1920s, 1940s, and more recently in the 2010s, but no single direction of change that can be called a permanent shift. This suggests that the location of hurricane landfalls is driven by natural variations in the climate system rather than a simple, linear increase or decrease. However, the researchers note that if the climate patterns that favor West Coast landfalls, such as persistent high pressure over the western United States, become more common in the future due to climate change, the risk to different parts of Florida could shift significantly.

Ultimately, this research provides a clearer map for forecasters and residents alike. By understanding the specific atmospheric signatures that precede a landfall in a particular region, meteorologists can better anticipate where a storm is likely to go days in advance. If a forecast model shows a deep trough over the Rockies and a strong ridge over New England, it suggests a higher risk for the East Coast or Panhandle. If the model shows a ridge over the West and a trough over the East, the risk shifts to the West Coast or a near-miss scenario. This level of detail helps communities prepare for the specific threats they face, turning a general warning about a hurricane into a precise understanding of the risks to their specific corner of the state. As the population of Florida continues to grow, knowing not just that a storm is coming, but exactly where it is likely to strike, becomes an essential tool for safety and resilience.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →