Perspectives and preferences on delivery of preconception care in primary care among people of reproductive age and primary care professionals – A mixed methods systematic review
This mixed methods systematic review of 51 studies synthesizes the perspectives of primary care professionals and people of reproductive age to conclude that while both groups are receptive to preconception care in primary settings, successful implementation depends on trusted communication, increased public awareness, and robust system-level support.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Before a pregnancy begins, a person's health is not just a personal matter; it is the foundation upon which a new life is built. Scientists and doctors have long understood that the choices made in the months and years before conception—such as managing chronic conditions, eating nutritious food, and avoiding harmful substances—can dramatically improve the chances of a healthy pregnancy and a healthy child. This period of preparation is known as preconception care. While the medical community agrees that this care is vital, a significant gap exists between knowing it is important and actually delivering it. Most people of childbearing age receive their regular health checkups at local clinics, yet these visits rarely include a conversation about future pregnancy plans. The question remains: how can these clinics become places where people feel comfortable discussing their readiness for parenthood without feeling judged or rushed?
To answer this, a team of researchers from universities in the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States conducted a massive review of existing studies. They gathered and analyzed 51 separate research projects involving thousands of people of reproductive age and hundreds of healthcare workers. These studies took place across Europe, North America, Australia, and parts of Africa and Asia. The researchers did not run new experiments; instead, they acted as synthesizers, looking for common threads in what patients wanted and what doctors felt they could provide. Their goal was to understand the perspectives of both sides: what do people hoping to have children think about receiving this advice, and what do the doctors and nurses think about giving it?
The review revealed that both patients and providers are generally open to the idea of discussing pregnancy preparation during routine medical visits, but the success of these conversations depends heavily on how they are handled. A central finding is that trust is the currency of these interactions. People of reproductive age expressed a strong preference for speaking with professionals they already know and trust, such as their regular family doctor or a nurse they see frequently. They described wanting these conversations to be sensitive and free of judgment. Many participants shared that they felt uncomfortable if they sensed the doctor was making assumptions about their age, lifestyle, or relationship status. When the tone felt critical or intrusive, people tended to shut down, hiding their true intentions or avoiding the topic entirely. Conversely, when the conversation was framed as a supportive check-in rather than a lecture, people were more willing to engage.
The timing and setting of these discussions also proved critical. The research suggests that trying to force a conversation about pregnancy planning into a visit for an unrelated acute issue, like a sore throat, feels inappropriate to most people. Instead, the most natural moments to bring up the topic are during appointments that already relate to reproductive health, such as cervical screening tests, contraception reviews, or postnatal checkups. In these contexts, the link between the visit and future family planning is clear, making the conversation feel logical rather than random. The researchers found that younger people were generally more open to being asked about their pregnancy plans at every visit, while older individuals often felt such questions were less relevant to them.
However, the path to making this a standard part of healthcare is not without obstacles. The review highlighted a distinct mismatch in expectations regarding who should start the conversation. Many patients feel that it is the doctor's responsibility to ask, believing that they might not know how to bring up the subject themselves or that the doctor is the expert who should guide them. On the other hand, many healthcare professionals feel that the responsibility lies with the patient to raise the topic, often because they worry about overstepping or because their appointments are too short to cover extra ground. This hesitation is compounded by a lack of time and resources. Doctors frequently reported that their schedules are so packed with urgent medical needs that they struggle to find space for preventive discussions that do not have an immediate crisis attached.
To bridge this gap, the study suggests that successful implementation relies on simple, low-pressure strategies. One effective method identified is the use of a single, open-ended question, such as asking if a patient is thinking about having a baby in the next year. This approach allows the patient to answer honestly without feeling pressured, and it gives them the choice to decline or to ask for more information. Another key element is the use of signposting, where the healthcare provider hands the patient a leaflet, a website link, or a text message with reliable information. This allows the patient to process the information on their own time and in private, which many found less intimidating than a face-to-face interrogation. The researchers also noted that many people simply do not know that preconception care exists or that it applies to them, even if they are not actively trying to conceive right now. Raising general awareness through posters in waiting rooms or community campaigns could help normalize the idea that preparing for a baby is a health priority for everyone.
The review concludes that integrating preconception care into primary care is possible and desirable, but it requires a shift in how these conversations are approached. It is not about adding a new, burdensome task to a doctor's plate, but rather weaving the topic into the existing fabric of care. This means training healthcare workers to ask the right questions with empathy, ensuring they have the time and resources to do so, and creating an environment where patients feel safe to share their hopes and concerns. The evidence suggests that when these conditions are met, people are receptive to the idea. The challenge now lies in building the systems and training that will turn this potential into a routine reality for families everywhere.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.