Varieties of Nationalist Frames and Support for High-skill Immigration in a Developmental Setting
This paper demonstrates that in developing contexts like China, framing nationalism around either learning from or competing with advanced nations can effectively increase public support for high-skilled immigration, challenging the conventional view that nationalist sentiments inherently drive exclusion.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
For decades, social scientists have operated under a simple assumption: that strong feelings of national pride usually push people to reject outsiders. The logic is intuitive. If a nation is defined by who belongs to it, then those who do not fit that picture are seen as a threat to the community's culture and unity. This view has dominated research on immigration, particularly in wealthy nations where the arrival of new people is often framed as a disruption to the status quo. However, this perspective overlooks a different kind of patriotism, one that is less about guarding borders and more about building a stronger future. In many developing countries, the primary goal of the nation is not just to preserve what exists, but to catch up with the world's most advanced powers. In this context, the desire for national strength can transform the way citizens view foreign talent. Instead of seeing immigrants as intruders, they may be viewed as essential tools for modernization, much like a builder who welcomes skilled workers to help finish a house that is still under construction.
Researchers Xinyi Jiang and Li Shao from Zhejiang University set out to test whether this developmental mindset could change public opinion in China. They focused on a specific type of immigration: high-skilled workers, such as scientists, engineers, and doctors, who possess the expertise needed to drive economic and technological growth. The team wanted to know if framing immigration as a way to achieve national goals—specifically, either to learn from successful nations or to compete against geopolitical rivals—could make people more supportive of welcoming these workers. To find out, they conducted a survey experiment involving Chinese internet users. The participants were randomly divided into groups, with each group reading a short, news-style passage that presented the issue of foreign talent through a different lens.
One group read a passage that emphasized the dangers of immigration, describing it as a threat to the purity and continuity of Chinese cultural traditions. This served as a baseline for the traditional, exclusionary view. Another group read a passage focused on competition, which highlighted the intense technological rivalry between China and the United States. This text argued that to win this global race and defend national interests, China needed to attract the world's top minds to strengthen its own capabilities. A third group read a passage focused on learning, which pointed out that the world's most innovative hubs, such as Silicon Valley, owe their success to open policies that bring in international talent. This frame suggested that China should adopt similar strategies to accelerate its own development. A fourth group, the control group, read nothing about immigration at all. After reading their assigned text, all participants were asked how much they supported policies to attract more foreign professionals and whether they believed such immigration would help the country's economy and technology.
The results revealed a clear shift in attitude driven by how the issue was presented. When the researchers compared the groups, they found that both the competition-focused and the learning-focused frames significantly increased support for high-skilled immigration compared to the group that read the exclusionary message. In fact, the people who read about the need to compete with the United States or the need to learn from successful Western models were much more likely to agree that bringing in foreign experts was a good idea. The study suggests that when citizens are reminded that their nation has a developmental mission, they are willing to set aside fears of cultural dilution in favor of the perceived benefits of national progress. The experiment showed that these positive effects were not just a vague feeling; they were linked to a specific belief that immigrants contribute to the country's growth and technological upgrading.
To ensure these findings were not just a result of the experimental setup, the researchers also analyzed existing survey data from a broader population. This real-world data confirmed the experimental results: Chinese citizens who naturally held a mindset focused on learning from other countries or who felt a strong sense of geopolitical competition with the United States were more likely to support admitting foreign workers. This consistency between the controlled experiment and the observational data strengthens the conclusion that developmental nationalism can act as a powerful counterweight to exclusionary sentiment. The study does not claim that all nationalist feelings are positive or that this approach works for every type of immigration, but it does demonstrate that the specific goal of national development can reshape public opinion.
This research offers a nuanced view of how people think about immigration in a developing world. It challenges the long-held belief that nationalism always leads to closed borders. Instead, it shows that when the national story is about building, catching up, and strengthening, the door can open wider to those who can help build that future. For policymakers and observers, the finding suggests that the way immigration is discussed matters immensely. Framing the arrival of foreign talent not as a cultural threat, but as a strategic asset for national advancement, can turn a potential point of conflict into a source of public support. In a world where the race for technological leadership is fierce, understanding this dynamic is crucial for nations trying to balance their identity with their ambition.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.