← Latest papers
📈 economics

Carbon Accounting Disclosure and Firm Performance: A Multi- Theoretical Framework under Sustainability Committee Oversight

This study proposes a multi-theoretical framework to examine how monetary and non-monetary carbon accounting disclosures, moderated by the effectiveness of sustainability committees, influence the financial and ESG performance of Malaysian oil and gas companies, ultimately offering policy recommendations to support Malaysia's 2050 Net-Zero emissions target.

Original authors: Alaa Ahmed Khafagy, Hussein H. Sharaf-Addin, Parvez Alam Khan, Syed Emad Azhar Ali, Faozi A. Almaqtari

Published 2026-07-01
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Alaa Ahmed Khafagy, Hussein H. Sharaf-Addin, Parvez Alam Khan, Syed Emad Azhar Ali, Faozi A. Almaqtari

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The Big Picture: The "Carbon Receipt" Problem

Imagine the Oil and Gas industry is like a massive, high-speed restaurant. For decades, this restaurant has been burning a lot of fuel and creating a lot of smoke (carbon emissions). The world is now telling them, "You need to clean up your act and show us exactly how much smoke you're making."

This paper focuses on Carbon Accounting Disclosure (CAD). Think of CAD as the restaurant's "Carbon Receipt." It's a report that tells the public exactly how much pollution the company is creating and what they are doing to fix it.

However, there is a problem in Malaysia (where this study is focused). The rules for writing these receipts are currently voluntary. It's like asking the restaurant to write its own menu descriptions. Some write honest, detailed lists of ingredients (substantive reporting), while others just write "We use fresh ingredients!" without listing anything specific (symbolic or "greenwashing" reporting).

The Main Characters in the Study

The researchers are looking at three main things to see how they affect the restaurant's success:

  1. The Carbon Receipts (Carbon Accounting Disclosure):
    The study splits these receipts into two types:

    • Monetary CAD: This is the "Price Tag" receipt. It puts a dollar value on the pollution. Example: "We spent $1 million on carbon taxes and $500,000 on green technology."
    • Non-Monetary CAD: This is the "Story" receipt. It describes actions without specific dollar signs. Example: "We reduced our smoke by 10% and set a goal to be smoke-free by 2050."
  2. The Performance Score:
    How is the restaurant doing? The study looks at two scores:

    • Financial Performance: Is the restaurant making money? (Measured by profit margins and stock market value).
    • ESG Performance: Is the restaurant a good citizen? (Measured by how well it treats the environment, society, and follows rules).
  3. The "Green Guardian" (Sustainability Committee):
    This is the star of the show. Imagine the restaurant has a Board of Directors. Usually, they are general managers. But this study suggests adding a special Sustainability Committee (SC).

    • Think of the SC as a specialized quality control inspector who sits at the head table. Their only job is to make sure the "Carbon Receipts" are honest, accurate, and not just empty promises. They ensure the "Price Tags" and "Stories" match reality.

The Core Question

The researchers are asking: "Does writing a detailed Carbon Receipt help the restaurant make more money and be a better citizen? And does having a 'Green Guardian' (the Sustainability Committee) make that help even stronger?"

The Theory: Why This Matters

The paper uses three "lenses" to explain why this works:

  • The "Social Contract" (Legitimacy Theory): The restaurant needs the neighborhood's permission to operate. If they hide their smoke, the neighborhood gets angry and might shut them down. Honest receipts build trust.
  • The "Neighborly Chat" (Stakeholder Theory): Investors, customers, and regulators are all neighbors asking, "What are you doing?" Honest answers keep these neighbors happy and willing to invest.
  • The "Trust but Verify" (Agency Theory): Sometimes, the managers (agents) want to look good for a quick bonus, even if they are lying about the smoke. The "Green Guardian" (SC) acts as a strict supervisor to stop the managers from cheating and ensures the shareholders (owners) get the truth.

What the Researchers Expect to Find (The Hypotheses)

Based on their framework, the paper proposes the following:

  1. Honest Receipts = Better Performance: Companies that write detailed, honest Carbon Receipts (both with prices and stories) will likely see better financial results and higher ESG scores. It's like a restaurant that is transparent about its ingredients attracting more loyal customers.
  2. The "Green Guardian" Super-Charges the Effect: This is the most important part. The researchers believe that simply writing a receipt isn't enough. If a company has a strong Sustainability Committee watching over the process, the link between "Honest Receipts" and "Success" becomes much stronger.
    • Analogy: If a student writes a great essay but no one checks it, it might be full of lies. But if a strict teacher (the SC) checks it and ensures it's true, the student gets a better grade (better performance) because everyone trusts the work.

The Goal of the Study

The researchers want to prove that for Malaysian Oil and Gas companies to reach the country's goal of Net-Zero emissions by 2050, they need to stop treating carbon reporting as a symbolic gesture.

They argue that companies need to:

  • Start reporting both the costs (Monetary) and the actions (Non-Monetary) of their carbon footprint.
  • Establish a dedicated Sustainability Committee to act as a watchdog.

By doing this, these companies can avoid "greenwashing" (pretending to be green), gain the trust of investors, lower their risk, and ultimately become more profitable and sustainable.

Summary in One Sentence

This paper suggests that for Malaysian Oil and Gas companies to succeed, they shouldn't just write vague promises about saving the planet; they need to write detailed, honest reports about their carbon costs and actions, and they need a specialized "Green Guardian" committee to make sure those reports are real, which will lead to better profits and a better reputation.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →