← Latest papers
📄 medicine

Primary Care Physicians’ Perspectives on Video Consultation Services for acute medical conditions in public primary care clinics in Singapore: A Qualitative Study

This qualitative study of 16 primary care physicians in Singapore reveals that while they find video consultations for acute conditions convenient and acceptable, they face significant challenges regarding platform usability, increased administrative burdens, and safety concerns for elderly or complex patients lacking physical examinations.

Original authors: Jambay Dorji, Stella Xiao Jun Poh, Emily Pui-Yan Lee, Gary Chun-Yun Kang, Aminath Shiwaza Moosa, Ngiap Chuan Tan

Published 2026-06-28
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Jambay Dorji, Stella Xiao Jun Poh, Emily Pui-Yan Lee, Gary Chun-Yun Kang, Aminath Shiwaza Moosa, Ngiap Chuan Tan

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine a busy primary care clinic in Singapore as a bustling train station. Usually, if you feel sick, you have to pack your bags, travel to the station, wait in line at the ticket counter, and then sit on a platform until your doctor calls your name.

In January 2023, this station introduced a new "Express Teleport" service. Instead of traveling to the station, patients could stay home, click a button on their phone, and instantly "teleport" into a doctor's office via video. This service was designed for sudden, non-emergency illnesses like a bad cold or a stomach bug.

This study is like a group chat where the station managers (the doctors) were asked: "How is this Express Teleport working for you?" They gathered 16 doctors to share their honest thoughts, fears, and tips. Here is what they found, explained simply:

The Good News: A Shortcut for Simple Trips

The doctors agreed that for simple, straightforward problems (like a sore throat or a mild stomach ache), this video service is a fantastic shortcut.

  • The Analogy: Think of it like ordering food delivery. You don't need to drive to the restaurant, park, and wait in line. You just order from your couch, and the food (or medicine) comes to you.
  • The Benefit: Patients save time and gas money. They don't have to leave their homes, which is great for keeping sick people from spreading germs to others in the waiting room.

The Bumpy Road: Glitches in the "Teleport" Machine

While the idea is great, the actual machine (the software platform) has some glitches that make the doctors' jobs harder.

  • The Clunky Remote: The doctors compared the video platform to a remote control with too many buttons. To see one simple screen, they had to click five different things. This wasted precious time.
  • The "Ghost" Passengers: Sometimes, patients didn't show up on time. Because the system gave every patient a unique "virtual room," doctors had to constantly peek into these empty rooms to see if anyone had arrived. It was like a conductor checking 20 different train cars to see if a passenger had boarded, instead of just looking at one main gate.
  • The Ticking Clock: The appointments were scheduled in tight 5-minute blocks. If a patient had a slightly more complicated problem, the doctor felt stressed because they were running late for the next "train." They felt the schedule was too rigid for the unpredictable nature of human illness.

The Safety Net: When to Stay in the Station

The doctors felt confident using the video service for young, healthy people with clear symptoms. However, they had serious concerns about using it for certain groups.

  • The Elderly Puzzle: For older patients (like an 80-year-old), a video call is like trying to solve a puzzle with half the pieces missing. Without being able to physically touch or examine the patient, the doctors worried they might miss something serious.
  • The "Overseas" Loophole: There was a scary possibility that someone from another country might accidentally use the service. The doctors worried about legal trouble if they treated a patient they weren't legally allowed to treat, similar to a taxi driver accidentally picking up a passenger in a different country where they don't have a license.

The Heavy Backpack: Extra Work

The doctors also mentioned that this new service added a heavy backpack to their shoulders.

  • The Admin Burden: Instead of just being a doctor, they had to become data entry clerks. They spent time double-checking addresses and phone numbers—tasks they felt should have been done by the office staff before the call started. This took time away from actually treating the patient.

The Training: Learning to Fly

On the bright side, the doctors said the training they received was okay.

  • The Analogy: It was like learning to drive a car. They sat in the passenger seat with a senior driver for a while, then drove alone. They felt that while the "driving school" (training) was good, the real skills came from actually driving on the road and seeing many different types of traffic (patients).

The Bottom Line

The doctors in this study are willing to use the video service, but they see it as a tool with limits.

  • It works well for simple, quick trips (common colds, stomach bugs).
  • It struggles with the clunky software, the tight schedules, and the extra paperwork.
  • It is risky for elderly patients or complex cases where a physical exam is needed.

The study concludes that while the technology is accepted, the system needs to be smoothed out (like fixing the remote control and the train schedule) and the rules need to be clearer to keep everyone safe.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →