The Role of Patents in Shaping Turkish University Rankings: National and International Perspectives
This article analyzes the positive correlation between patent activity and Turkish university rankings across national and international frameworks, while highlighting structural challenges like low commercialization rates and offering six policy recommendations to enhance the country's innovation ecosystem.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the modern world, universities are judged by more than just the quality of their classrooms or the number of books their professors write. Increasingly, they are measured by their ability to turn ideas into real-world solutions. When a researcher discovers a new material or a better way to treat a disease, the next step is often to protect that discovery with a patent. A patent is a legal document that gives the inventor the right to stop others from using the idea without permission, acting as a shield that allows the invention to be sold or licensed to companies. This process, known as commercialization, bridges the gap between a laboratory experiment and a product on a shelf. For governments and ranking organizations, the number of patents a university holds and how often those patents are used by others have become key signs of how well the institution is serving the economy. The question facing Turkey's higher education system is whether these legal protections are actually helping universities climb the global ladder of prestige, or if the connection is more complicated than it appears.
A new analysis by researchers at Haliç University in Istanbul investigates exactly this relationship. The authors looked at how patent activity—filing for protection, getting approval, and selling the rights to inventions—correlates with where Turkish universities stand in both national and international rankings. They gathered data from official Turkish government bodies that track intellectual property and from major global ranking systems that evaluate universities based on research and innovation. Their work reveals that there is indeed a positive link: universities that generate more patents, especially those that are filed internationally or cited by other inventors, tend to have higher scores in rankings that value innovation. However, the researchers are careful to note that this does not mean patents automatically cause a university to become famous. Instead, the relationship is a two-way street. Highly ranked universities attract more money, better scientists, and stronger industry partnerships, which naturally leads to more patents. In this sense, a strong patent portfolio is often a sign of an already successful institution rather than the sole engine that drives it to success.
The study highlights that the impact of patents depends heavily on which ranking system is being used. In international lists like the Times Higher Education World University Rankings, patents matter, but only in a specific way. These rankings do not simply count how many patents a university files; they look at how often other inventors cite the university's research when they file their own patents. This means that a university must produce high-quality, applied research that others find useful to gain points. In contrast, Turkey's own national evaluation systems, such as those run by the Council of Higher Education and TÜBİTAK, place a much heavier weight on the sheer volume of patent applications and the number of licenses signed. This creates a situation where a university might perform very well in national rankings by focusing on domestic patents, yet remain invisible in global rankings that prioritize international citations and reputation.
One of the most striking findings comes from the case of Yıldız Technical University. This institution ranked first in Turkey for its economic contribution and held a high number of licensed patents and international applications. Yet, it does not appear in the global QS World University Rankings at all, and its position in the Times Higher Education list is relatively low. The researchers suggest this is because the university has focused its energy on national innovation metrics, which reward filing patents and working with local industry, rather than on the global academic visibility required to climb international lists. This divergence shows that there is no single strategy for success; what helps a university rise in Turkey might not help it rise in the world. The study also points out that the type of research matters. Universities strong in engineering and materials science tend to see faster results in patent rankings, while those focused on pharmaceuticals and biotechnology face much longer legal processes, sometimes taking seven to ten years to get a patent approved, which delays their ability to score points in rankings that look at recent activity.
Despite the progress made since 2013, when Turkey began a major push to support university technology transfer, significant hurdles remain. The researchers found that many Turkish universities struggle to turn their patent applications into actual commercial products or companies. A major barrier is the cost of filing patents internationally, which must be paid in foreign currencies like the US dollar or Euro. As the value of the Turkish lira has fluctuated, these costs have become prohibitive for all but the wealthiest universities, creating a gap between the top institutions in Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir and those in other regions. Furthermore, the system often counts utility models—simpler, shorter-term protections for inventions—alongside full patents, which can inflate the numbers without reflecting genuine breakthrough innovation. The authors argue that to truly understand the value of university research, Turkey needs a better system for tracking not just how many patents are filed, but how much money they actually generate and how many new companies they create.
The paper concludes with a set of practical recommendations for Turkish policymakers and university leaders. They suggest that universities should align their patent strategies with the specific goals of the rankings they wish to improve. If a university wants to climb international lists, it must ensure its research is published in global journals and filed as international patents, not just domestic ones. They also call for financial support to help universities pay for international filing fees and for a shift in how technology transfer offices operate, moving from administrative paperwork to professional business development. Most importantly, the authors propose a new requirement for universities to report detailed data on their commercialization success, such as licensing revenues and the survival rates of new companies. This would provide the clear, hard evidence needed to move beyond simple counts of patent applications and toward a true understanding of how Turkish universities are driving innovation and economic growth.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.