Papers where the original authors have engaged with our plain-language explanation.
For every paper on this page, at least one of the original authors has seen our plain-language explanation and engaged with it — either confirming it reads accurately or requesting corrections that we then applied. An endorsement does not mean the authors formally approve every sentence, but it does mean the explanation has passed the eyes of the people who wrote the paper.
993 papers reviewed by authors · 991–993 / 993
This paper proposes six new conjectures based on Pythagorean triples and biquadratic Diophantine equations that, if satisfied, would provide the necessary conditions to discover a perfect cuboid or generate all possible Euler bricks.
This paper argues that systematically biased forecasts can be optimal rather than irrational when forecasters face uncertainty about how policymakers will react to their predictions, as those policy actions subsequently alter the very outcomes being forecasted.