← Latest papers
⚛️ phenomenology

Absence of Majorana-Weyl fermions in d=4 and the theory of Majorana fermions

This paper argues that the conventional definition of a Majorana fermion as a single chiral field plus its charge conjugate is inconsistent with the absence of Majorana-Weyl fermions in four dimensions, proposing instead that true Majorana fermions in the type I seesaw model arise only through a Bogoliubov transformation of chiral fields, a distinction that has direct implications for neutrinoless double beta decay.

Original authors: Kazuo Fujikawa

Published 2026-01-15
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Kazuo Fujikawa

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

The Big Picture: A Mix-Up in the Particle World

Imagine you are trying to build a specific type of Lego structure called a "Majorana Fermion." In the world of particle physics, this is a special kind of particle that is its own mirror image (its own antiparticle).

For a long time, physicists have been trying to build this structure using a specific recipe involving "chiral" particles (particles that spin in a specific direction, like right-handed or left-handed screws). The paper argues that the standard recipe people have been using for decades is actually broken. It tries to build a Majorana particle in a 4-dimensional world (our universe), but the laws of physics say this specific combination is impossible.

The Problem: The "Chirality-Changing" Mistake

Think of Chirality as the "handedness" of a particle.

  • Right-handed (νR\nu_R): Like a right-handed screw.
  • Left-handed (νL\nu_L): Like a left-handed screw.

In the "Type I Seesaw Model" (a popular theory explaining why neutrinos have mass), physicists tried to create a Majorana particle by taking a right-handed screw and gluing it to its mirror image. They called this new object ψ+\psi_+.

The Mistake:
To make this work, they used a rule called "Charge Conjugation" (swapping a particle for its antiparticle). However, the rule they used was a "chirality-changing" rule.

  • The Analogy: Imagine you have a right-handed screw. You try to turn it into its mirror image, but the rule you use forces it to instantly become a left-handed screw.
  • The Result: The paper points out a fundamental theorem: In our 4-dimensional universe, you cannot have a particle that is both a Majorana particle (its own mirror) AND a Weyl particle (purely right-handed or purely left-handed).

Because of this "No-Go Theorem," when the physicists tried to apply their "chirality-changing" rule to their formula, the whole thing mathematically vanished. It's like trying to bake a cake by mixing flour and water, but your recipe accidentally turns the flour into nothingness. The result is zero cake.

The Solution: The "Bogoliubov Transformation" (The Great Mixer)

So, if the standard recipe fails, how do we get a real Majorana particle? The author suggests a different approach, using a mathematical tool called a Bogoliubov transformation (or a generalized Pauli-Gursey transformation).

The Analogy:
Imagine you have two separate buckets of paint: one is Red (Right-handed) and one is Blue (Left-handed).

  1. The Old Way: You tried to mix them by just pouring the Red bucket into the Blue bucket and hoping they stick together. This failed because the rules of the universe said "Red and Blue can't be the same color."
  2. The New Way (The Paper's Solution): Instead of just pouring them, you take a blender. You take the Red paint and the Blue paint, and you blend them together in a very specific, precise way to create two new, stable colors: Purple and Orange.

In physics terms:

  • You start with the Right-handed and Left-handed neutrinos.
  • You apply this "blender" (the canonical transformation).
  • You end up with two new particles, ψM1\psi_{M1} and ψM2\psi_{M2}.
  • Crucially: These new particles are Dirac-type particles first (they have both left and right parts mixed in), and then they are treated as Majorana particles.

This method respects the laws of physics. It doesn't try to force a right-handed particle to be its own mirror image directly; instead, it creates a stable, mixed particle that can be its own mirror image.

Why Does This Matter? (The Double Beta Decay)

The paper explains that this isn't just a math game; it changes how we predict real-world events, specifically Neutrino-less Double Beta Decay.

  • The Scenario: Imagine two neutrons in an atom trying to turn into protons and spit out electrons, but without spitting out any neutrinos. This is only possible if the neutrino is a Majorana particle.
  • The Old (Broken) View: If you used the "chirality-changing" rule, the math suggested this event might happen, but the math was actually "vanishing" (giving zero). It was an illusion.
  • The New (Correct) View: By using the "blender" method, the math works correctly. It shows that a chiral projection (looking at just one side of the particle) of a Majorana fermion is not a simple chiral fermion.

The Takeaway:
The paper concludes that you cannot simply define a Majorana neutrino by just taking a right-handed neutrino and its mirror image. That definition is mathematically "indeterminate" (it leads to nonsense or zero). To have a valid Majorana fermion in our universe, you must first mix the left and right parts together properly (using the Bogoliubov transformation) to create a stable, well-defined particle.

Summary in One Sentence

The paper argues that the common way physicists try to define a Majorana neutrino is mathematically broken because it violates a fundamental rule of 4D space, and the only way to fix it is to use a specific "mixing" transformation that creates a stable, well-defined particle first.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →