← Latest papers
⚛️ quantum physics

Demonstration of tripartite cat states in two distinct classes of entanglement

This paper reports the experimental realization and characterization of macroscopic tripartite entangled cat states belonging to two distinct classes, GHZ-cat and W-cat, across three microwave resonators coupled to a superconducting transmon, achieving fidelities of 0.83 and 0.70 respectively and validating their fundamentally different entanglement structures.

Original authors: May Chee Loke, Jonathan Schwinger, Kehui Yu, Yingshan Zhang, Amon M. Kasper, Tanjung Krisnanda, Yvonne Y. Gao

Published 2026-07-15
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: May Chee Loke, Jonathan Schwinger, Kehui Yu, Yingshan Zhang, Amon M. Kasper, Tanjung Krisnanda, Yvonne Y. Gao

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you have three magical pendulums swinging in a room. In the quantum world, these aren't just swinging back and forth; they can be in two places at once, like a pendulum swinging both left and right simultaneously. This is called a "cat state," named after a famous thought experiment where a cat is both alive and dead.

Scientists have long been able to link two of these pendulums together so they move in perfect sync (bipartite entanglement). But linking three? And doing it with "macroscopic" (big, visible) pendulums? That's been a huge challenge.

In this new study, a team of researchers at the National University of Singapore successfully created and measured two very different types of three-pendulum connections using a special setup of microwave circuits. They didn't just guess; they built the states, measured them, and proved they were real.

The Two Types of Quantum Teamwork

The researchers created two distinct "teams" of three pendulums, which they call GHZ-cat and W-cat. Think of them as two different ways three friends can agree on a secret.

  1. The GHZ-cat (The "All-or-Nothing" Team):
    Imagine three friends who decide to either all jump up or all stay down. If you look at just two of them, you can't tell what they are doing; they look completely random. But if you look at all three together, their connection is perfect.

    • The Catch: If you lose even one friend (or if one pendulum stops swinging), the connection between the remaining two instantly vanishes. They become strangers.
    • The Result: The team created this state with a fidelity of 0.83 ± 0.02. Fidelity is like a grade on a test; 1.0 is perfect. This score is high enough to prove they truly created a "genuine" three-way entanglement where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
  2. The W-cat (The "Resilient" Team):
    Now imagine a different group of three friends. If one leaves the room, the other two still have a secret handshake between them. They are more robust.

    • The Catch: This state is harder to make perfectly.
    • The Result: The team created this state with a fidelity of 0.70 ± 0.02. Even though it's a bit lower than the GHZ score, it's still high enough to prove it's a genuine three-way entanglement. Crucially, they showed that even if you "trace out" (ignore) one pendulum, the other two still share a connection. In fact, the W-cat retained 64% of its ideal two-pendulum connection after one was lost.

How They Did It: The "One-to-All" Magic Trick

To make these states, they used a tiny superconducting chip (a transmon) as a conductor. This conductor has three "levels" of energy (like a piano with three keys: low, middle, and high).

  • They used the low and middle keys to control the first type of state (GHZ).
  • They used all three keys to control the second type (W), which required a clever new trick called "Uneven Echoed Conditional Displacement" (UECD). This allowed them to move the pendulums in different directions depending on which key the conductor was pressing, even though the pendulums reacted at different speeds.

They didn't just guess the states were there. They used a method called subspace tomography. Instead of trying to map the entire infinite universe of possibilities (which would take forever), they focused on the specific "logical" spots where the pendulums were supposed to be. It's like checking if a specific pattern of lights is on, rather than measuring every single photon in the room.

What They Ruled Out

The paper explicitly argues against the idea that these states are just messy mixtures or simple two-way connections.

  • They proved the GHZ-cat has no pairwise entanglement. If you check any two pendulums alone, there is zero connection. The entanglement is strictly a three-way phenomenon.
  • They proved the W-cat is not just a GHZ state. It has a different structure that allows it to survive the loss of one member.
  • They showed that these are macroscopic states. The pendulums had an amplitude of α=1.5\alpha = 1.5, which is large enough to be considered "macroscopic" in the quantum world, bridging the gap between the tiny quantum realm and the big world we see.

How Sure Are They?

The team is very confident in their measurements, but they are also honest about the limits.

  • Measured, not just simulated: They physically built the states and measured them. The numbers 0.83 ± 0.02 and 0.70 ± 0.02 are experimental results, not computer guesses.
  • Verified by multiple tests: They didn't just look at one thing. They checked the "Pauli operators" (a set of 64 different measurements) and even violated Mermin's inequality (a mathematical test for quantum weirdness) with a score of 2.7 ± 0.1, which is higher than the limit of 2 allowed for non-quantum systems.
  • The "But": The paper notes that their scores weren't perfect because the pendulums lost energy (photon loss) over time. The oscillators had coherence times of 50–100 µs. The authors suggest that if they could build better pendulums with 1 ms coherence times, they could push the fidelity up to 0.93 ± 0.03 for GHZ and 0.88 ± 0.03 for W. But with the current hardware, the results are what they are: a successful, verified demonstration of two distinct classes of three-way quantum entanglement.

In short, they didn't just find a new toy; they built a new playground where three quantum objects can dance together in two completely different, proven ways.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →