← Latest papers
🔢 mathematics

Optimality of Wouter van Doorn's Upper Bound for the Mayer-Erd\H{o}s Farey Problem

This paper proves that the minimum number of Farey fractions strictly between two "badly ordered" fractions in the Farey sequence of order nn is asymptotically n/4n/4, thereby establishing the optimality of Wouter van Doorn's previously known upper bound for the Mayer-Erdős Farey problem.

Original authors: Ricky Cipollini

Published 2026-07-28
📖 3 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Ricky Cipollini

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine a vast, orderly library where every book represents a fraction, like 1/2, 3/7, or 99/100. In the world of mathematics, there is a special way to arrange these books called the "Farey sequence." Think of it as a perfectly sorted shelf where you only keep books with small page counts (denominators) up to a certain limit, say nn. On this shelf, the books are lined up from smallest to largest value. Usually, as you move to the right, the "page count" of the books tends to get bigger, just like how a story might get more complex.

But what happens if you find two books that are "badly ordered"? This is a funny term mathematicians use for a pair of fractions where the one on the right has a smaller page count than the one on the left, even though its value is higher. It's like finding a thick novel sitting next to a thin pamphlet, but the pamphlet actually tells a "bigger" story. The big question that has puzzled mathematicians for decades is: if you spot such a weird pair on your shelf, how many other books must be squeezed in between them? Is there a guaranteed minimum number of "filler" books that have to exist to keep the order correct? This isn't just about numbers; it's about understanding the hidden rhythm and spacing of how numbers fit together, a puzzle that connects to deep questions about how prime numbers and fractions dance around each other.

This paper, written by Ricky Cipollini, tackles that exact puzzle. It focuses on a specific problem known as Erdős Problem 1005, which asks for the "worst-case scenario": what is the absolute smallest number of fractions you can find between two badly ordered ones as your shelf gets infinitely large? A mathematician named Wouter van Doorn had previously figured out that you would never find more than about one-quarter of the shelf's total size (n/4n/4) in that gap. He guessed that this limit was the true answer, but he couldn't prove that you couldn't find fewer than that.

Cipollini's paper proves that van Doorn was right. The author shows that no matter how you try to arrange the fractions, you can never squeeze the gap between two badly ordered fractions to be smaller than roughly n/4n/4. In other words, the "badly ordered" pairs are like two magnets that always repel each other just enough to leave a specific amount of empty space, and that space is exactly one-quarter of the total scale. The paper doesn't just guess this; it provides a rigorous mathematical proof, using clever counting tricks and estimates to show that the lower limit matches the upper limit perfectly. So, the mystery is solved: the constant is exactly 1/41/4. The paper confirms that van Doorn's upper bound is the optimal, unbreakable rule for this mathematical game.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →