← Latest papers
📈 economics

Market Structure and Export Competitiveness in the Global Mango Trade: An HHI, CMS, and RSCA Approach (2006-2024)

This study analyzes the global fresh mango market from 2006 to 2024 using HHI, CMS, and RSCA methods to reveal a highly competitive landscape where Thailand and Peru have gained competitiveness while India has declined, ultimately demonstrating that agricultural productivity, quality leadership, and market diversification are critical drivers of export success.

Original authors: Abdoulaye Mahamat Soumaine, Mevlüt Gül

Published 2026-08-03
📖 4 min read☕ Coffee break read

Original authors: Abdoulaye Mahamat Soumaine, Mevlüt Gül

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine the global economy as a giant, bustling marketplace where countries are the vendors, and fruits are their wares. In this specific corner of the market, we are looking at the mango, often called the "king of fruits." For a long time, economists have tried to figure out who wins the race to sell the most mangoes to the world. To do this, they use a few special tools. One tool, called the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), acts like a crowd meter; it tells us if the market is dominated by a single boss (a monopoly) or if it's a lively, crowded bazaar with many different sellers. Another tool, the Constant Market Share (CMS) analysis, is like a race tracker that separates a country's sales growth into two parts: how much the whole world's appetite for mangoes grew, and how much the country actually stole market share from its neighbors. Finally, there's the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), which is basically a scorecard that shows if a country is naturally better at selling mangoes than anything else it produces. Understanding who is winning and why matters because it helps farmers, governments, and traders know whether they should just grow more fruit to make money, or if they need to focus on growing better, fancier fruit to survive.

This research paper, written by Abdoulaye Mahamat Soumaine and Mevlüt Gül, takes a deep dive into the global mango trade from 2006 to 2024 to see who is really winning the game and what strategies are working. The authors start by checking the "crowd meter" (HHI) and find that the mango market is not a monopoly run by one giant country. Instead, the scores they found, ranging between 673.75 and 848.18, show a highly competitive, diverse marketplace with many players, rather than a single boss controlling the show.

When they looked at who is actually gaining or losing ground, the results were surprising. The study found that India, which is the world's biggest producer of mangoes, is actually losing its competitive edge. The data shows India's export competitiveness score dropped sharply from 0.90 in 2006 to just 0.35 in 2024. In fact, the CMS analysis revealed that India lost a massive amount of potential market share, recording a negative value of -661,383 tons. This suggests that simply growing a huge amount of fruit isn't enough if you can't get it to the right markets, often due to strict rules about pests and quality.

On the other hand, countries like Thailand and Egypt are playing the game differently and winning. Thailand recorded a positive gain of 578,997 tons in market share, and Egypt climbed from a score of 0.48 to 0.91. These countries seem to be focusing on quality and finding specific markets that want their fruit, rather than just trying to sell the most volume. Peru and Pakistan also maintained very strong positions, with scores between 0.86 and 0.95, showing they are highly specialized in exporting mangoes.

The researchers also ran some math models to figure out why these changes are happening. They discovered that for the global market, being more productive (growing more fruit per acre) helps a country stay competitive. However, if the cost of importing things needed to grow the fruit goes up, it hurts competitiveness. Interestingly, the study found that for some countries, like Spain, the old rule of "cheaper is better" doesn't apply. Spain managed to boost its competitiveness even when import prices rose, because it focused on high-value, premium products and smart logistics rather than just selling cheap bulk fruit.

The paper concludes that the days of winning the mango race just by growing the most fruit are over. The data suggests that countries relying on massive volume without focusing on quality or meeting strict international standards are losing their spot. Instead, the winners are those who adopt a "quality leadership" strategy, offering premium products and diversifying where they sell. The authors suggest that to stay in the game, producers need to invest in better technology, meet high safety standards, and stop relying solely on selling huge quantities of fruit.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →