Living with Imperfect Sustainability: Responsibility, Trust and Everyday Ethical Negotiation in Just Agrifood Transitions
Drawing on interviews with women trained in mindfulness, this article introduces the concept of "imperfect sustainability" to argue that ethical engagement in agrifood transitions is not defined by consistent behavioral perfection but by a relational, emotionally demanding practice of negotiating responsibility and trust within constrained and inconsistent food systems.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine you are standing in a giant, chaotic supermarket, but instead of just buying groceries, every single item you pick up comes with a secret mission. You are told that to save the planet, you must only buy the "green" apples, never waste a crumb, and always choose the local farmer. This is the world of sustainable food, a field of science that studies how what we eat connects to climate change, animal welfare, and fairness for workers. For a long time, experts thought of this like a math problem: if you know the right answer (buy organic, eat less meat), you will just do it. They called the gap between knowing the right thing and actually doing it the "intention-behavior gap," as if people were just failing a test. But this paper suggests that life isn't a math test; it's more like trying to navigate a stormy ocean in a small boat while everyone else is shouting directions from the shore. The real question isn't "Why don't you do it perfectly?" but "How do you keep steering the boat when the waves are crashing and the map is blurry?"
This is exactly what the researchers Belgin Bulgan Satı and Saadet Pınar Temizkan set out to explore. They didn't just ask people what they should do; they sat down with 20 women who had trained in mindfulness (the practice of paying close attention to the present moment without judging yourself) and self-compassion (being kind to yourself when you mess up). These women weren't perfect superheroes; they were regular people trying to eat ethically in a world that makes it incredibly hard. The study found that these women didn't see sustainability as a checklist of perfect behaviors. Instead, they developed a new way of living called "imperfect sustainability."
Think of "imperfect sustainability" like a garden that you tend to every day, even though you can't control the weather, the pests, or the soil quality. You might forget to water a plant one day, or a storm might knock over a fence, but you don't throw the whole garden away. You just keep showing up, pulling a few weeds, and watering what you can. The paper suggests that for these women, being "sustainable" wasn't about never making a mistake. It was about staying connected to their values even when they had to compromise.
The researchers discovered six main ways these women navigated their ethical food lives:
- Learning to Notice Food Differently: Before their training, eating was like a background noise—automatic and fast. Mindfulness turned eating into a high-definition experience. One woman described listening to the sound of onions sizzling in a pan, realizing she could stop eating when she was full rather than finishing the whole package just because it was there. It was like switching from a blurry, black-and-white TV to a crisp, 4K screen; suddenly, they could see the signals their bodies were sending.
- Food as an Ethical Relationship: They stopped seeing food as just an object to buy and started seeing it as a chain of people and animals. One participant realized that every apple on her table had a "journey" involving farmers, truck drivers, and workers. It wasn't just about buying a product; it was about caring for the invisible hands that brought it to her.
- Living with Imperfect Sustainability: This is the heart of the story. The women admitted they sometimes ate the "wrong" thing. One said, "I know this isn't right, but I'm going to eat it anyway." Instead of beating themselves up, they learned to sit with that uncomfortable feeling. They realized that being ethical isn't about being perfect; it's about not giving up when you aren't. It's the difference between a runner who quits because they tripped and a runner who gets back up, dusts off their knees, and keeps jogging.
- Negotiating Sustainability with Others: Eating is a social act. If your mom makes your favorite cookies and you refuse to eat them because they aren't "green," you might hurt her feelings. The women learned to navigate this tricky dance. Instead of lecturing their families or refusing to eat, they found quiet ways to be different, like ordering a salad at a meat-heavy dinner or just eating what was served without making a scene. They learned to stay connected to their loved ones while still holding onto their own values.
- Living Within Imperfect Food Systems: The women faced huge barriers. Sometimes "ethical" food was too expensive. Sometimes the labels were confusing, and they didn't know who to trust. One participant said the biggest hurdle wasn't money, but trust. She didn't know if the "organic" label was real or if the local farmer was secretly using chemicals. It was like trying to buy a used car without a mechanic to check the engine. They realized they couldn't fix the whole system alone, and that wasn't their fault.
- Sustainability as Ethical Identity: Finally, these women stopped seeing sustainability as a list of rules to follow. It became part of who they were. Instead of thinking, "Did I pass the test today?" they thought, "I am someone who cares, even when it's hard." When they slipped up, they didn't see it as a failure; they saw it as part of an ongoing learning process.
The paper is very clear about what this is not. It does not say that mindfulness fixes the food system or that these women are now perfect consumers. In fact, the study explicitly rules out the idea that inconsistency is a sign of failure or that people are just "lazy." The researchers argue that the "intention-behavior gap" isn't a problem to be solved by shaming people; it's a normal part of living in a broken system. They also note that because all 20 participants were women, we can't be sure if men experience this exact same way, so we shouldn't assume these findings apply to everyone yet.
Ultimately, this study suggests that we need to stop looking for perfect heroes and start valuing resilient people. "Imperfect sustainability" is a way of saying that responsibility doesn't disappear just because the system is unfair or the labels are confusing. It's about the quiet, daily effort of trying to do good, even when you can't do everything right. It's about keeping the garden alive, one imperfect day at a time.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.