Exploring User Experience and Media Engagement of Augmented Reality in Product Design Education
This study demonstrates that while Augmented Reality (AR) significantly enhances student interactivity and preference in product design education compared to traditional PPT presentations, its effective implementation requires students to overcome the challenge of acquiring specialized technical skills.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the world of product design, the journey from a spark of an idea to a finished object is rarely a straight line. It begins with a deep understanding of how a person, a tool, and the space they occupy interact. Designers call this the human-machine-environment relationship. For decades, students learning this craft have relied on familiar tools: sketches, physical models, and slide presentations to explain how a new product might work. These methods have served well, but they often leave a gap. A student might build a digital model of a hairdryer, but without a physical prototype, they cannot truly feel its weight or how it fits in a hand. They might print a model, but that process is slow, and if the shape feels wrong, they must start over. As technology has advanced, a new tool has emerged to bridge this gap between the digital and the physical: augmented reality. Unlike virtual reality, which pulls a user into a completely made-up world, augmented reality layers digital images directly over the real world the user is standing in. It allows a designer to see a virtual object sitting on their actual desk, interacting with the real light and shadows around it. The question for educators has become whether this new way of seeing and interacting helps students learn better than the traditional methods they have used for years.
A researcher at National Kaohsiung Normal University set out to answer this question by bringing augmented reality into a classroom of junior-level product design students. The study focused on a specific, critical phase of design education where students analyze how a target group of people would use a product. For this experiment, the students were asked to take apart a hairdryer to understand its internal mechanics and then redesign it for a specific group, such as the elderly or young children. First, the students created their analysis using the traditional method: a standard slide presentation. They gathered their findings, arranged them on slides, and presented them to the class. A few weeks later, the same students were taught how to use augmented reality software. They rebuilt their analysis, this time creating an interactive experience where viewers could point their devices at a marker and see text, transparent images, and videos floating in the air around the real object. After completing both versions of the project, the students filled out a survey to describe their feelings about the process, their level of focus, and how much effort they felt they had put in.
The results revealed a clear divide between the comfort of the familiar and the challenge of the new. When working with the traditional slides, the students were relaxed and unbothered. They had used this tool countless times before, so they did not feel stressed, but they also did not feel particularly engaged. The survey data showed that while making the slides, many students lost focus, thinking about other things or forgetting to pay full attention to the task at hand. The process felt routine, and because it was so easy, it did not demand their full mental energy. In contrast, the augmented reality project was a different story entirely. The students found the new medium significantly more challenging and time-consuming. They reported spending much more time and effort to create the interactive experience, often struggling with the technical requirements of the software. Despite this added difficulty, they did not feel bored or frustrated in the negative sense; instead, they felt a sense of creative stimulation. The survey indicated that they found the work to be a rich experience that encouraged them to think creatively, even though it required them to learn complex new skills from scratch.
When comparing the two methods directly, the study found that augmented reality offered a distinct advantage in one specific area: interactivity. The students felt that the augmented reality presentations allowed for a much deeper level of engagement than the static slides. They believed that the ability to overlay digital information onto the real world made the design concepts more dynamic and easier to explore. However, this power came with a cost. The students noted that creating high-quality augmented reality content required specialized technical skills that they had to learn during the course. They also observed that while the slides were better for showing videos and reading text on a large screen, the augmented reality version, viewed on smaller mobile devices, suffered from visual limitations like shaking or distortion. Yet, despite the technical hurdles and the extra time required, the students expressed a strong preference for using augmented reality in the future. They were willing to invest the necessary effort because they saw the potential for the technology to transform how design ideas are shared and understood.
The study concludes that while traditional slides are a safe and stress-free option for presenting design analysis, they often fail to capture the full attention of the learner. Augmented reality, on the other hand, demands more from the student but rewards them with a more immersive and creative learning experience. It forces the designer to engage deeply with the material, turning a passive presentation into an active exploration. The research suggests that while the technology is not yet perfect and requires a steep learning curve, it holds significant promise for design education. By integrating augmented reality, educators can help students move beyond simple observation and into a space where they can truly interact with their ideas, bridging the gap between the digital models they create and the physical reality they aim to build. The findings indicate that the future of design education may well lie in these hybrid spaces, where the effort to learn new tools is met with a deeper understanding of the human experience.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.