From Resilience to Antifragility: A Frontier Thinking Framework for Regenerative Urban Hospitality Ecosystems
This paper proposes a theoretical framework for transitioning urban hospitality ecosystems from resilience to antifragility by integrating frontier thinking, design thinking, and regenerative development, supported by qualitative research with Ukrainian experts to define Regenerative Urban Hospitality Ecosystems (RUHE) as adaptive systems capable of thriving amid ongoing disruptions.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Cities are living things, constantly shifting and reacting to the world around them. When a storm hits, a flood rises, or a conflict breaks out, these urban systems face a choice: simply survive the blow or use the shock to grow stronger. For years, experts have focused on the first option, a concept called resilience. Think of resilience as a rubber band; it stretches under pressure and snaps back to its original shape once the force is gone. It is a vital quality for keeping a city running during a crisis, ensuring that hotels stay open and people have a place to sleep. However, researchers are now asking if this is enough. In a world where uncertainty is the only constant, merely returning to how things were before might not be enough to thrive. A newer idea, known as antifragility, suggests that some systems can actually get better when they are stressed, much like a muscle that grows stronger after being lifted. This paper explores how cities, specifically the networks of hotels, restaurants, and local communities that make up the hospitality industry, can move from just bouncing back to actually evolving into something new and more capable.
The researchers behind this study, based in Ukraine, looked at this question through the lens of a country that has faced extreme and prolonged disruption. They wanted to understand how the people who run hotels and manage cities in places like Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lviv, and Odessa are responding to war and destruction. Instead of just asking how these businesses survived, they asked how they changed. The team interviewed twenty-eight experts, including hotel managers, city officials, and university researchers, to gather their real-world experiences. They found that the most successful systems were not just trying to restore their old operations. Instead, they were using the crisis as a trigger to rethink their entire purpose. These experts described a shift in thinking where a hotel that once only offered beds for tourists began providing shelter for displaced families, or where a restaurant started coordinating food deliveries for volunteers. The crisis forced them to expand their role, turning them into critical parts of the city's survival network.
The study introduces a new way of thinking called "frontier thinking" to explain how this transformation happens. This is not a specific tool or a checklist, but rather a mindset that allows organizations to see a disaster not as a dead end, but as a chance to invent new ways of working. When a hotel manager uses this mindset, they stop asking how to get back to normal and start asking what new value they can create for their community. The researchers found that this approach turns the stress of the situation into a source of innovation. For example, when traditional tourism collapsed, these ecosystems did not just wait for it to return. They created new types of travel, such as educational tours about history and memory, or digital projects to preserve cultural heritage that was at risk of being lost. By experimenting with these new ideas and working closely with neighbors and local governments, they built a system that was not just tough, but regenerative.
This leads to the paper's main proposal: the concept of a Regenerative Urban Hospitality Ecosystem. This is a model where the hospitality industry does more than just serve visitors; it actively helps heal and rebuild the city around it. The researchers argue that resilience is only the first step, the ability to keep the lights on during a storm. Antifragility is the second step, where the system learns from the storm and becomes more adaptable. But the final goal is regeneration, where the system uses the energy of the crisis to create a better, more connected, and more sustainable city than the one that existed before. The study suggests that this happens when different groups—businesses, communities, and governments—work together to co-create solutions. They found that when these groups collaborate, they generate new social value, such as stronger community bonds and a renewed sense of identity, which are just as important as economic recovery.
The authors are careful to note that this is a new theoretical framework, meaning it is a fresh way of looking at the problem that has been tested through interviews but not yet proven with large-scale data across many different cities. They acknowledge that while the ideas are promising, they need to be tested further to see how they work in other contexts. However, the evidence from the interviews is compelling. It shows a clear pattern where the most successful responses to crisis were not about holding on to the past, but about letting go of old models to build something new. The study concludes that for cities facing ongoing uncertainty, the path forward is not just to be resilient, but to be antifragile. By embracing change and using it as a catalyst for innovation, urban hospitality ecosystems can transform from simple service providers into powerful engines for the regeneration of the entire city.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.