← Latest papers
📄 agriculture

Determinants of Farmers’ Willingness to Participate Agricultural Waste Recycling in Iran

This study of 375 farmers in Kamyaran County, Iran, demonstrates that an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model, incorporating moral norms and knowledge, effectively predicts their high willingness to recycle agricultural waste, with attitude, subjective norms, and moral norms identified as key drivers.

Original authors: Shabnam Fathi, Hamideh Maleksaeidi, Farzad Eskandari, Mehdi Karami Dehkordi

Published 2026-09-07
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Shabnam Fathi, Hamideh Maleksaeidi, Farzad Eskandari, Mehdi Karami Dehkordi

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

In the fields of western Iran, a quiet but significant challenge plays out every harvest season. After the wheat is cut and the corn is gathered, vast amounts of plant material remain behind. For centuries, farmers have managed this residue by burning it in the open or leaving it to rot, practices that fill the air with smoke and waste a valuable resource. Today, technology offers a different path: turning this agricultural waste into useful products like biofuel, paper, or soil enhancers. However, for this shift to happen, the people working the land must be willing to change their habits. Understanding why a farmer chooses to recycle rather than burn requires looking beyond simple economics. It involves understanding how a person feels about an action, what their neighbors think, and a deeper, internal sense of right and wrong. Researchers have long used a framework called the theory of planned behavior to study these decisions, which suggests that our actions are driven by our personal attitudes, the social pressure we feel, and our belief that we have the power to act. Recent thinking has expanded this view to include the role of knowledge and moral duty, recognizing that people often act because they feel it is their ethical responsibility, not just because it is convenient or popular.

A team of researchers from the University of Kurdistan and Shahrekord University set out to understand these forces among farmers in Kamyaran County, a region in western Iran surrounded by mountains and forests. They focused on a specific group of 375 farmers, asking them detailed questions about their views on recycling agricultural waste. The researchers wanted to know if these farmers were willing to participate in recycling programs and, more importantly, what factors drove that willingness. They built a model that combined the standard ideas of attitude and social pressure with two new elements: the farmers' actual knowledge about how to recycle waste and their internal moral norms, or their personal sense of obligation to protect the environment. By analyzing the responses, the team could see which factors truly mattered when a farmer decided to act.

The results revealed a landscape of high potential but low awareness. The farmers surveyed expressed a strong willingness to recycle their waste if the opportunity arose. They generally held positive views about the practice, believing it would help the environment and create economic benefits. However, their actual knowledge about how to do it was surprisingly low. While many understood that returning waste to the soil could improve fertility or that it could reduce pests, they knew very little about the advanced possibilities, such as turning waste into alcohol, cosmetics, or energy. This gap in knowledge did not stop them from wanting to help, but it did shape their attitude. The study found that knowledge acted as a foundation; when farmers learned more about the specific benefits and methods, their positive attitude toward recycling grew stronger, which in turn increased their willingness to participate.

Perhaps the most powerful drivers of this willingness were not financial or logistical, but social and moral. The researchers found that what a farmer's neighbors and family thought mattered significantly. If a farmer believed their community approved of recycling, they were more likely to want to do it themselves. Even more influential was the internal sense of duty. The study showed that when farmers felt a personal moral obligation to protect the environment and future generations, their willingness to recycle increased. This moral feeling was so strong that it acted as a bridge: the social pressure from neighbors helped activate this internal sense of duty, which then fueled the desire to act. In this way, the community's expectations helped turn a personal value into a concrete intention.

Interestingly, the study ruled out a factor that is often assumed to be critical: the belief that one has the resources to act. The researchers measured "perceived behavioral control," which is essentially a farmer's confidence in their ability to gather and recycle waste given their available time, money, and equipment. Despite the fact that farmers felt they lacked the necessary infrastructure and found the process time-consuming, this lack of resources did not significantly lower their willingness to participate. They were still eager to help, even if they felt they could not yet do it alone. This suggests that the desire to recycle is currently outpacing the practical ability to do so, creating a gap between intention and action.

The study concludes that to move from willingness to actual recycling, the focus must be on education and community building. Because knowledge directly improves attitude, and attitude is the strongest predictor of willingness, the researchers recommend regular training programs. These programs should not just explain the environmental benefits but also show the practical ways waste can be turned into valuable products like compost or bioenergy. Furthermore, because social norms and moral duty are so influential, extension services and mass media should frame recycling as a shared community responsibility and a moral imperative. By strengthening the internal sense of duty and clarifying the practical steps, it may be possible to bridge the gap between the farmers' strong desire to help and the current lack of infrastructure, turning their willingness into a new reality for the region.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →