← Latest papers
📄 medicine

Prevalence and Characteristics of Adverse Analytical Findings Among Athletes in Kuwait: A National Cross-Sectional Study of the Kuwait Anti-Doping Program (2022–2023)

This national cross-sectional study of Kuwait's anti-doping program (2022–2023) reveals a 3.4% prevalence of adverse analytical findings among 667 athletes, with anabolic androgenic steroids being the most detected prohibited substances and no significant associations found between positive results and demographic or sport-related factors.

Original authors: Hanan AL-Shemali, Nadia AL-Shemali

Published 2026-10-14
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Hanan AL-Shemali, Nadia AL-Shemali

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ✨ This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

In the world of competitive sport, the promise of fair play is the foundation upon which every race, match, and match is built. To keep this promise, international organizations maintain a list of substances and methods that are strictly forbidden because they can artificially boost performance or pose serious health risks. When an athlete provides a sample of their blood or urine, it is sent to a specialized laboratory to be checked against this list. If the lab finds a banned substance, the result is called an adverse analytical finding. This is not a guess or a suspicion; it is a confirmed detection of something that should not be there. Tracking how often these findings occur is vital for sports officials. It helps them understand if their current rules and testing methods are working, where they need to focus their education efforts, and whether the landscape of violations is changing over time. Without this data, anti-doping programs would be operating in the dark, unable to adapt to new threats or protect the integrity of the game.

For the first time, researchers have mapped out the landscape of these findings within Kuwait. A team from the Kuwait Anti-Doping Agency analyzed every doping control sample collected from athletes across the nation between January 2022 and December 2023. They looked at 667 samples in total, drawn from athletes registered with sports clubs and national federations. The goal was simple: determine how many tests came back positive, who these athletes were, and exactly what banned substances were found. The study covered a wide range of activities, from individual pursuits like swimming, wrestling, and shooting to team sports such as football, basketball, and volleyball. The samples were processed by a laboratory in neighboring Qatar that holds international accreditation, ensuring the results met the highest global standards.

The analysis revealed that out of the 667 samples tested, 23 showed the presence of prohibited substances. This means that roughly 3.4 percent of the tested athletes returned a positive result, while the vast majority, nearly 97 percent, tested negative. The researchers examined whether factors like age, gender, nationality, or the type of sport influenced the likelihood of a positive test. They found no statistical link between these characteristics and the results. Whether an athlete was young or older, male or female, Kuwaiti or a foreign national, or competing in a team or individual sport, the rate of positive findings did not vary significantly. The majority of the athletes tested were men, Kuwaiti citizens, and between the ages of 16 and 29, reflecting the general makeup of the country's competitive sports population.

When the researchers looked closer at the specific substances that triggered these positive results, a clear pattern emerged. The most common culprits were anabolic agents, a class of drugs that includes synthetic versions of the male hormone testosterone. These substances are known to increase muscle mass and strength, making them particularly attractive for power-based sports. Within this group, anabolic androgenic steroids were the most frequently detected. The study identified specific steroids such as metenolone, drostanolone, boldenone, and nandrolone. While steroids made up the bulk of the findings, other banned substances were also present, including peptide hormones, beta-2 agonists, stimulants, cannabinoids, and glucocorticoids. In some cases, a single sample contained more than one prohibited substance.

The distribution of these findings across different sports offered further insight, though the researchers cautioned against assuming that certain sports are inherently more prone to violations. Athletics accounted for the highest number of positive tests, followed by volleyball and weightlifting. However, the authors explained that this pattern likely reflects where the testing was concentrated rather than where the violations are most widespread. Anti-doping agencies often focus their resources on sports that are historically considered high-risk or where the physical demands suggest a higher potential for performance enhancement. Consequently, athletes in these sports are tested more frequently, which naturally increases the chance of detecting a violation. The study did not find evidence that athletes in other sports were violating rules less, only that fewer tests were conducted in those areas during this period.

This work represents a significant step forward for sports integrity in the region, providing the first national baseline for understanding doping in Kuwait. Before this study, there was no published data describing the prevalence of these findings within the country's sports system. The results confirm that while the overall rate of detected violations is relatively low, the use of anabolic steroids remains the primary concern. The findings suggest that future efforts should focus on strengthening education about the dangers and consequences of steroid use, particularly among young athletes. They also support the need for continued, targeted testing strategies that are guided by intelligence and risk assessment rather than random selection. By establishing this clear picture of the current situation, Kuwait now has a reliable reference point to measure progress, refine its anti-doping policies, and ensure that the spirit of fair competition remains intact for all athletes.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →