Does Regenerative Agriculture Strengthen Rural Resilience? Gender-Differentiated Evidence on Productivity and Food–Nutrition Security in Rural Nigeria
Using 2023/2024 Nigerian household data and a multinomial endogenous switching regression model, this study finds that regenerative agriculture significantly boosts both agricultural productivity and food-nutrition security, with female-headed households experiencing disproportionately larger gains in nutrition outcomes compared to male-headed households.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In the rural landscapes of Nigeria, where the majority of families rely on the land for their survival, the soil is facing a quiet crisis. Decades of farming, combined with shifting weather patterns, have left the earth less fertile and more vulnerable to droughts and floods. For the farmers who work this land, the stakes are high: when the soil fails, food disappears, and hunger follows. In response to this challenge, a farming approach known as regenerative agriculture has gained attention. This method does not simply try to extract more from the land; instead, it seeks to heal it. By using techniques like planting different crops together, reducing how much the soil is turned over, and adding natural compost instead of chemical fertilizers, farmers aim to restore the soil's ability to hold water and nutrients. The goal is to create a system that is not only productive but also resilient enough to withstand the shocks of a changing climate.
For years, experts have debated whether these methods actually work for the people who need them most. While the environmental benefits are clear, it has been less certain how adopting these practices changes the daily lives of rural families, particularly regarding how much food they can buy and how nutritious their meals are. A critical question remains unanswered: do these benefits reach everyone equally, or do they favor some groups over others? In many farming communities, the roles and resources available to men and women differ significantly, which could mean that a solution that helps one group might leave the other behind. Understanding these nuances is essential for designing policies that truly lift entire communities out of poverty and hunger.
A recent study set out to answer these questions by looking directly at the experiences of rural households in Nigeria. Researchers gathered data from over 1,400 families, examining who had adopted regenerative farming practices and how those choices affected their harvests and their ability to feed their families. The study paid close attention to the difference between households led by men and those led by women, recognizing that the two groups often face different challenges and have access to different resources. The researchers found that regenerative agriculture is already quite common in these areas, with nearly all farmers practicing some form of intercropping, where multiple crops are grown together, and a large majority using organic manure to enrich the soil. However, the adoption of other techniques, such as minimizing how much the soil is disturbed, varied depending on the household.
The analysis revealed that adopting these regenerative practices made a substantial difference in the lives of the farmers. For the households that switched to these methods, the amount of food they produced per acre of land increased dramatically. The study showed that male-led households saw their agricultural output rise by about 73 percent, while female-led households saw a significant increase of nearly 50 percent. This means that the land became more productive for everyone, though the scale of the gain was larger for the men. More importantly, the study looked beyond just the volume of crops to see how this translated into food security and nutrition. The researchers measured this by looking at how much money families spent on food and by counting the variety of different food groups, such as grains, vegetables, and proteins, that appeared on their tables.
The results here offered a surprising and hopeful twist. While male-led households saw a 44 percent increase in their food spending and a 52 percent improvement in the variety of foods they ate, female-led households saw even larger gains in these areas. Women-led households that adopted regenerative practices increased their food spending by 66 percent and improved their dietary diversity by 81 percent. This suggests that when women control the income from a more productive farm, they tend to prioritize feeding their families better, ensuring a wider range of nutrients are available. The study indicates that regenerative agriculture is a powerful tool for strengthening rural resilience, but its impact is not uniform. The benefits are real and significant for both groups, yet the way those benefits are experienced depends heavily on who is leading the household.
Despite these successes, the study also highlighted the barriers that prevent more widespread adoption. Factors such as access to credit, participation in farmer training programs, and the ability to earn income from sources other than farming all played a role in whether a family could successfully switch to these methods. The researchers noted that women often face greater hurdles in accessing these resources, which can limit their ability to fully benefit from regenerative techniques. The findings suggest that for regenerative agriculture to truly transform rural Nigeria, policies must be designed with these gender differences in mind. By ensuring that women have equal access to extension services, affordable loans, and productive land, the community can ensure that the gains in productivity and nutrition are shared more equitably. The path forward is clear: supporting these practices with the right resources can help rural families not only survive but thrive in the face of environmental change.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.