A socio spatial assessment of water scarcity and its effects on student wellbeing in rural university settings
This qualitative study of a rural Eastern Cape university reveals how chronic water scarcity, rooted in apartheid-era spatial inequalities and compounded by environmental and institutional failures, constitutes a form of infrastructural violence that severely disrupts academic continuity, compromises student health, and disproportionately burdens female students, thereby necessitating urgent institutional and governmental interventions to restore equity and resilience.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Water is the most basic requirement for life, yet for millions of people, access to it is not a given but a daily struggle. In the field of infrastructure studies, researchers look beyond the physical pipes and pumps to understand how the failure of these systems shapes human society. They examine a concept known as infrastructural violence, which describes how the breakdown or absence of essential services can inflict systematic harm on communities, effectively punishing them for circumstances beyond their control. This harm is not random; it often follows historical lines of inequality, hitting marginalized areas hardest. When a university, an institution meant to foster learning and growth, finds itself without water, the consequences ripple far beyond a dry tap. It disrupts education, threatens health, and forces students to make impossible choices between their studies and their basic dignity. Understanding these dynamics is crucial because it reveals how a lack of water is not just a logistical problem, but a profound social crisis that undermines the very purpose of higher education.
A team of researchers set out to investigate this exact crisis at the University of Fort Hare, specifically at its main campus in Alice, a rural town in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. This campus, like many others in historically disadvantaged rural areas, relies entirely on the local municipality for its water supply. The researchers wanted to understand what happens when that supply fails repeatedly and how it affects the lives of the students living there. To get a clear picture, they spoke directly with 50 residential students, half of whom were women and half men. These students had lived on campus for at least two terms, meaning they had experienced the water shortages firsthand. Through long, detailed conversations, the researchers listened to their stories about how the lack of water changed their daily routines, their health, and their ability to learn.
The students described a situation where water scarcity was not caused by a single factor, but by a perfect storm of environmental and human failures. On one hand, the region has been hit by severe droughts and unpredictable weather patterns that have drained the local rivers and dams. On the other hand, the students pointed to deep problems within the local government's management of the water system. They spoke of aging pipes that were never fixed, strikes by municipal workers, and a general lack of maintenance. The researchers found that the university was completely dependent on this external system, with no backup plan of its own. When the municipality failed, the university failed with it. This dependency meant that a political or administrative dispute in the town could instantly shut down the campus, turning a place of learning into a site of survival.
The impact on the students' education was immediate and severe. When the water stopped, the university often had to close libraries, cancel science laboratory classes that required running water, and postpone exams. This created a chaotic environment where students had to cram months of work into a few weeks once the water returned. The constant disruption meant that students were not just learning; they were constantly playing catch-up, exhausted and overwhelmed. The researchers noted that this cycle of closing and reopening was a direct result of the campus having no independent water source, a vulnerability that urban universities with better infrastructure did not face to the same degree.
Beyond the classroom, the lack of water took a heavy toll on the students' physical and mental well-being. Without running water, basic hygiene became a luxury. Students could not bathe, wash their clothes, or clean their living spaces. In the most desperate moments, the lack of water meant that toilets could not be flushed, forcing some students to resort to open defecation in the bushes around campus, which created serious health risks. The psychological strain was equally heavy. Students reported feeling shame and anxiety about their appearance, leading many to withdraw from social interactions and even skip classes to avoid being seen by peers. The researchers found that this erosion of dignity was a direct consequence of the infrastructure failing, stripping students of the basic conditions needed to feel safe and respected.
The burden of these shortages fell disproportionately on female students. For women, the lack of clean water made managing their monthly periods incredibly difficult and dangerous. Without access to clean water for washing and proper sanitation for disposal, they faced health risks and intense psychological distress. The researchers highlighted that this gendered impact was a clear example of how infrastructure failures are not neutral; they hit the most vulnerable groups the hardest. The students were forced to adapt in ways that should not be necessary for university attendees. They began boiling water or adding bleach to make it safe to drink, and many spent their limited money on bottled water. This meant that the cost of a basic human right was being shifted from the state to the individual student, draining their financial resources and their time.
The study concluded that the water crisis at the university is a form of structural violence that erodes academic equity and student health. It is not merely a technical glitch but a systemic failure that forces students to carry the burden of a broken system. The researchers argued that the university cannot continue to rely on a failing municipal network. They recommended that the institution invest in its own autonomous water systems, such as drilling boreholes, harvesting rainwater, and building large-scale filtration plants. They also called for specific emergency protocols to protect female students and for better cooperation between the university, the government, and the municipality to fix the root causes of the problem. The findings make it clear that until the university secures its own water supply, the students will remain trapped in a cycle of disruption, where their education is constantly held hostage by the lack of a resource as simple as water.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.