Barriers, Coping Strategies and Institutional Constraints Shaping Healthcare Access for People with Disabilities under Nigeria's Basic Health Care Provision Fund: A Qualitative Study from Bauchi State, Nigeria
Despite Nigeria's equity-oriented Basic Health Care Provision Fund, a qualitative study in Bauchi State reveals that people with disabilities face significant structural, financial, and attitudinal barriers to accessing primary care due to low awareness, inadequate infrastructure, and a lack of disability-specific institutional monitoring and training.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
In many parts of the world, the promise of healthcare is not just about having a doctor nearby, but about whether that doctor can actually see, hear, and treat every person who walks through the door. For people with disabilities, this promise often breaks down before they even reach the clinic. They face walls that are too high, doors that are too narrow, and staff who do not know how to communicate with them. In Nigeria, the government has tried to fix this by creating a special fund called the Basic Health Care Provision Fund. Think of this fund as a dedicated pot of money designed to make sure the poorest and most vulnerable people can get free or cheap medical care at local clinics. The idea is to build a system where no one is left behind because of their income or their physical condition. However, a policy on paper is very different from the reality of a patient waiting in a line. The crucial question is whether this new system actually works for people with disabilities, or if the old barriers have simply been painted over with new rules.
A team of researchers from Nasarawa State University set out to answer this question by listening directly to the people who use these services. They traveled to Bauchi State in northeastern Nigeria, a region where many people live with physical, visual, or hearing impairments. Instead of just looking at government reports or counting how many clinics exist, the researchers sat down with twenty-five adults who identify as having disabilities. They asked these individuals to share their stories about trying to get medical help. The goal was to understand what it feels like to navigate a system that claims to be inclusive, and to find out where the cracks in the system actually are. The researchers spoke with people who use wheelchairs, those who cannot see, and those who cannot hear, ensuring they heard a wide range of experiences before drawing any conclusions.
What the researchers found was a picture of a system that is struggling to keep its promises. Despite the fund's goal of making care free and accessible, the people they spoke with described a daily struggle. The most common problem was money. More than half of the participants said that even with the new fund, they still faced costs they could not afford for medicine or treatment. For many, the journey to the clinic was just as difficult as the cost. Nearly two-fifths of the people interviewed said the clinics were too far away or that the buildings themselves were impossible to enter without help. For those who are deaf or hard of hearing, the barrier was communication; they often had to write notes to doctors who did not know sign language, leaving them feeling isolated and misunderstood.
Perhaps the most painful finding was how the medical staff treated them. A large majority of the participants, about eighty percent, reported that doctors and nurses were rude, dismissive, or even contemptuous of their disabilities. Only a tiny fraction, just eight percent, felt that the clinics were designed to meet their specific needs. When the system failed them, people did not just give up; they found other ways to survive. They turned to family members for money, relied on traditional remedies from local healers, or paid out of their own pockets to visit private clinics that were not part of the government fund. In many cases, non-governmental organizations and community groups stepped in to fill the gap, acting as the support system that the government fund was supposed to provide.
The study suggests that the problem is not just a lack of money, but a lack of preparation and planning. The clinics often lack the right equipment, and the staff have not been trained on how to care for people with different types of disabilities. The researchers noted that while the national policy talks about fairness and inclusion, the reality on the ground is that people with disabilities are still being pushed to the margins. The fund exists, but without specific rules to ensure clinics are accessible and staff are trained, it does not reach the people who need it most. The authors conclude that for the system to truly work, the government must do more than just fund the clinics. They must teach health workers how to be inclusive, make sure buildings are physically accessible, and create a way to track whether people with disabilities are actually getting the care they are promised. Until these changes happen, the fund remains a promise that many in Bauchi State cannot cash.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.