Governing low-altitude security: a comparative analysis of the safety–security nexus in unmanned aircraft governance across the United States, the European Union and Singapore
This paper employs an institution–technology–ideation framework to compare how the United States, the European Union, and Singapore govern the intertwined safety and security risks of unmanned aircraft, revealing that institutional configurations are shaped by administrative concentration and threat perception, and arguing that integrating these dual security dimensions is the critical challenge for emerging low-altitude economies.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.