Quantum technologies and Surveillance Evolutions: Enablement, disruption, and emergent futures
This article examines the historical trajectory and transformative potential of Quantum 1.0 and 2.0 technologies in deepening and disrupting surveillance capabilities, while advocating for a non-deterministic, interdisciplinary approach to ethical design and societal resilience against emerging quantum-driven surveillance futures.
Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer
Imagine a world where the invisible rules that govern the tiniest particles of matter are already running the devices in your pocket, the clocks on your wall, and the satellites guiding your car. This is not a scene from a science fiction movie about teleportation or shrinking people; it is the reality of our current information age. For decades, a first wave of technology, built on our understanding of how atoms and light behave, has quietly become the foundation of modern life. These tools allow us to store vast amounts of data, send messages instantly across the globe, and measure time with incredible precision. Because these technologies are so deeply woven into the fabric of society, they have also become the primary tools for watching and tracking people, places, and things. Now, scientists and social researchers are looking ahead to a second wave of innovation that promises to change these capabilities once again. This new era, often called the second quantum revolution, aims to harness even stranger and more powerful aspects of the quantum world, such as particles existing in multiple states at once or being linked across vast distances. The question is no longer just about what these machines can compute, but how they will reshape the way we are observed and the power dynamics that come with it.
A team of researchers from the University of Arizona, Erasmus University Rotterdam, and the University of Oregon has set out to map this shifting landscape. Their work focuses on the relationship between these emerging quantum technologies and the practice of surveillance. The authors argue that we are currently living in an era defined by what they call "Quantum 1.0." This first generation of technology includes the transistors inside computers, the lasers that carry internet traffic through fiber-optic cables, and the atomic clocks that keep the global positioning system running. While most people do not realize it, these devices rely on the principles of quantum physics to function. They are the invisible engines that make modern surveillance possible, allowing for the storage of massive databases, the rapid analysis of information, and the precise tracking of location. The researchers note that because these tools are so ubiquitous, they have become normalized; we use them every day without seeing them as the powerful surveillance instruments they have become.
The paper suggests that we are now standing on the brink of a transition to "Quantum 2.0." Unlike the first wave, which integrated quantum principles into broader, semi-classical systems, this new generation seeks to control and manipulate individual particles like atoms and photons directly. The researchers identify four main areas where this shift will occur: quantum computing, quantum communication, quantum sensing, and quantum simulation. In the realm of computing, these new machines could process information in ways that are currently impossible, potentially breaking the security codes that protect our private data and allowing for much more complex simulations of human behavior. In communication, new networks could use the unique properties of particles to create channels that are theoretically impossible to hack, while simultaneously rendering old security methods useless. Perhaps most significantly, new sensors could detect changes in magnetic fields or movements with a sensitivity that is exponentially greater than what we have today, revealing details about our environment and our bodies that are currently hidden.
The authors caution that the impact of these developments will be twofold: they will both deepen and disrupt our current surveillance practices. On one hand, the ability to gather data with such extreme precision and to analyze it with such speed will make surveillance more intense and more integrated into daily life. It will become easier to predict behavior, track movements, and monitor health in ways that are less noticeable to the people being watched. On the other hand, the power of these new computers to break existing encryption will disrupt the very systems we use to protect our privacy. This creates a potential divide where only wealthy nations or large organizations can afford the new, expensive security measures needed to stay safe, leaving others vulnerable. The researchers argue that this future is not inevitable. They suggest that we should not view these technologies as forces of nature that will simply happen to us, but rather as tools that can be shaped by human choices.
To navigate this future, the paper calls for a new approach that involves social scientists, ethicists, and the public in the conversation alongside engineers and physicists. The authors advocate for "value-sensitive design," a method where ethical considerations and social values are built into the technology from the very beginning of its development, rather than added as an afterthought. They also emphasize the need to avoid a deterministic view, which assumes that technology will inevitably lead to a specific outcome. Instead, they propose that we actively engage with these developments to ensure they serve society responsibly. By understanding the difference between the current, embedded quantum technologies and the emerging, more powerful ones, we can better prepare for a future where the lines between the visible and the invisible, and between privacy and observation, are redrawn. The goal is to ensure that as these powerful tools evolve, they do not simply deepen the reach of surveillance, but are guided by a collective effort to create a more just and equitable digital world.
Drowning in papers in your field?
Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.