← Latest papers
🔢 mathematics

A supercongruence fantasy on Fibonacci and Lucas (after Guillera)

Motivated by Guillera's observations, this paper generalizes Ramanujan-type supercongruences to a deeper level where Fibonacci, Lucas, and Apéry numbers naturally emerge.

Original authors: Wadim Zudilin

Published 2026-02-09
📖 5 min read🧠 Deep dive

Original authors: Wadim Zudilin

Original paper licensed under CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This is an AI-generated explanation of the paper below. It is not written or endorsed by the authors. For technical accuracy, refer to the original paper. Read full disclaimer

Imagine you are looking at a set of magical recipes that mathematicians use to calculate the value of Pi (π\pi). For over a century, we've known some of these recipes, written down by the legendary Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan. These recipes are like infinite sums: you add up an endless list of numbers, and if you do it right, the total gets closer and closer to a specific value involving π\pi.

Recently, a mathematician named Jesús Guillera noticed something fascinating. He took one of Ramanujan's "irrational" recipes (one involving square roots) and combined it with a "conjugate" version of itself. When he mixed them, the messy square roots canceled out, leaving behind two brand-new, "rational" recipes. But here's the twist: these new recipes didn't just use simple numbers; they used Fibonacci and Lucas numbers (the famous sequence where each number is the sum of the two before it: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8...).

The "Fantasy" of Supercongruences

The author of this paper, Wadim Zudilin, is essentially saying: "Let's see if we can find a hidden pattern in these new recipes."

In the world of numbers, there is a concept called a congruence. Think of it like a clock. If you look at the time 13:00, it's the same as 1:00 on a 12-hour clock. In math, we say 131(mod12)13 \equiv 1 \pmod{12}.

A supercongruence is like a super-accurate clock. It's a rule that says two huge, complicated sums of numbers are equal to each other not just on a normal clock, but on a clock with a very high number of hours (specifically, powers of prime numbers).

Zudilin is proposing a "fantasy" (a strong mathematical guess) that these new Fibonacci-based recipes follow a very specific, rigid pattern.

The Core Idea: The "Echo" Effect

The paper suggests that if you take a partial sum of these infinite recipes (stopping after NN terms instead of going to infinity), the result behaves in a predictable way when you change the stopping point.

Imagine you are stacking blocks to build a tower.

  • The Normal Rule: If you build a tower of height pp (where pp is a prime number), the top block has a certain property.
  • The Supercongruence Rule: Zudilin guesses that if you build a tower of height p2p^2, p3p^3, or even psp^s, the top block isn't just random. It "echoes" the structure of the smaller tower (ps1p^{s-1}), multiplied by a specific factor related to the prime number.

The paper claims that this "echo" pattern holds true for:

  1. Fibonacci and Lucas numbers mixed with standard binomial coefficients (combinations).
  2. Apéry numbers (another famous sequence used to prove that certain numbers are irrational) mixed with similar structures.

The "Rationalization" Trick

The paper describes a process called "rationalization."

  • Step 1: Start with a complex formula involving square roots (like 5\sqrt{5}).
  • Step 2: Create a "twin" formula where the sign of the square root is flipped.
  • Step 3: Add or subtract these twins. The square roots disappear, and you are left with a clean formula involving only whole numbers and the Fibonacci/Lucas sequences.

Zudilin applies this trick to several known formulas, creating new series for 1/π1/\pi and 1/π21/\pi^2. He then checks the "truncated" versions of these series (the partial sums) to see if they obey the supercongruence rules.

What the Paper Actually Claims

  • Observation: The author has run computer calculations and observed that these new Fibonacci-based sums do seem to follow the supercongruence rules. For example, the sum up to a certain point is congruent to a multiple of the sum up to a smaller point, modulo a high power of a prime.
  • The "Fantasy": The title calls it a "fantasy" because, while the computer data is strong, a formal mathematical proof for these specific Fibonacci/Lucas cases is not yet fully established in the same way it is for simpler cases. The author is proposing that these patterns are real and universal for this class of numbers.
  • The Difference: The paper notes a key difference between these new formulas and the old ones. The old formulas often relied on simple powers of numbers (like znz^n), which follow a simple one-step rule. The new Fibonacci-based formulas rely on sequences that follow more complex, multi-step rules. This suggests a deeper, more complicated layer of arithmetic structure.

In Summary

This paper is a mathematical "what if" story. It takes known recipes for calculating π\pi, mixes in the famous Fibonacci and Lucas number sequences, and proposes that these new combinations obey a hidden, high-precision symmetry (supercongruence) when you look at them through the lens of prime numbers. The author has verified this pattern numerically and is calling for a unified theory to explain why these Fibonacci numbers behave so elegantly in these deep mathematical structures.

Note: The paper is purely theoretical mathematics. It does not discuss medical applications, engineering uses, or future technologies. It is strictly about the beauty and patterns of numbers.

Drowning in papers in your field?

Get daily digests of the most novel papers matching your research keywords — with technical summaries, in your language.

Try Digest →